S+ Operations
by Abb
CVEs (7)
| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-24683 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.01 | Dec 22, 2020 | The affected versions of S+ Operations (version 2.1 SP1 and earlier) used an approach for user authentication which relies on validation at the client node (client-side authentication). This is not as secure as having the server validate a client application before allowing a… | ||
| CVE-2020-24675 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.01 | Dec 22, 2020 | In S+ Operations and S+ History, it is possible that an unauthenticated user could inject values to the Operations History server (or standalone S+ History server) and ultimately write values to the controlled process. | ||
| CVE-2020-24673 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.01 | Dec 22, 2020 | In S+ Operations and S+ Historian, a successful SQL injection exploit can read sensitive data from the database, modify database data (Insert/Update/Delete), execute administration operations on the database (such as shutdown the DBMS), recover the content of a given file… | ||
| CVE-2020-24678 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | 0.01 | Dec 22, 2020 | An authenticated user might execute malicious code under the user context and take control of the system. S+ Operations or S+ Historian database is affected by multiple vulnerabilities such as the possibility to allow remote authenticated users to gain high privileges. | ||
| CVE-2020-24674 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | 0.03 | Dec 22, 2020 | In S+ Operations and S+ Historian, not all client commands correctly check user permission as expected. Authenticated but Unauthorized remote users could execute a Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack, execute arbitrary code, or obtain more privilege than intended on the machines. | ||
| CVE-2020-24680 | Hig | 0.46 | 7.0 | 0.00 | Dec 22, 2020 | In S+ Operations and S+ Historian, the passwords of internal users (not Windows Users) are encrypted but improperly stored in a database. | ||
| CVE-2025-3756 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.00 | Apr 13, 2026 | A vulnerability exists in the command handling of the IEC 61850 communication stack included in the product revisions listed as affected in this CVE. An attacker with access to IEC 61850 networks could exploit the vulnera bility by using a specially crafted 61850 packet, forcing… |
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.01
The affected versions of S+ Operations (version 2.1 SP1 and earlier) used an approach for user authentication which relies on validation at the client node (client-side authentication). This is not as secure as having the server validate a client application before allowing a…
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.01
In S+ Operations and S+ History, it is possible that an unauthenticated user could inject values to the Operations History server (or standalone S+ History server) and ultimately write values to the controlled process.
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.01
In S+ Operations and S+ Historian, a successful SQL injection exploit can read sensitive data from the database, modify database data (Insert/Update/Delete), execute administration operations on the database (such as shutdown the DBMS), recover the content of a given file…
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss 0.01
An authenticated user might execute malicious code under the user context and take control of the system. S+ Operations or S+ Historian database is affected by multiple vulnerabilities such as the possibility to allow remote authenticated users to gain high privileges.
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss 0.03
In S+ Operations and S+ Historian, not all client commands correctly check user permission as expected. Authenticated but Unauthorized remote users could execute a Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack, execute arbitrary code, or obtain more privilege than intended on the machines.
- risk 0.46cvss 7.0epss 0.00
In S+ Operations and S+ Historian, the passwords of internal users (not Windows Users) are encrypted but improperly stored in a database.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.00
A vulnerability exists in the command handling of the IEC 61850 communication stack included in the product revisions listed as affected in this CVE. An attacker with access to IEC 61850 networks could exploit the vulnera bility by using a specially crafted 61850 packet, forcing…