| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-97195 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Secure Custom Fields WordPress plugin before 6.9.8 does not sanitize a persisted field definition before emitting part of it as an HTML attribute name, allowing a user able to configure its fields to store a payload that executes as JavaScript in the browser of any user who… | |||
| CVE-2026-97194 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Secure Custom Fields WordPress plugin before 6.9.8 does not perform a read-permission check when it renders and formats the values of its relational fields, allowing users with post-editing access (Contributor and above) to disclose the titles and non-public statuses of… | |||
| CVE-2026-97193 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Secure Custom Fields WordPress plugin before 6.9.8 does not verify that a user is allowed to edit the target object before writing to it during bidirectional relationship synchronization, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to add or remove a reference to… | |||
| CVE-2026-97192 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Secure Custom Fields WordPress plugin before 6.9.8 does not re-apply its field-group location rules when persisting values submitted through the post editor save path, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to write custom fields the site restricted to… | |||
| CVE-2026-96963 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Pie Register WordPress plugin through 3.8.4.15 does not perform an authorisation check in one of its AJAX actions, allowing users with a role as low as contributor to modify existing administrator-created invitation-code records. | |||
| CVE-2026-96961 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Pie Register WordPress plugin through 3.8.4.15 does not perform any capability, nonce or authentication check on one of its request handlers, allowing unauthenticated attackers to reset the Pie Register WordPress plugin through 3.8.4.15's settings to their defaults… | |||
| CVE-2026-85344 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The FV Flowplayer Video Player WordPress plugin before 7.5.57.7212 does not perform any authorization check on an AJAX action that carries out a site-wide content rewrite, so any authenticated user, including subscriber-level, can trigger a bulk modification of posts they should… | |||
| CVE-2026-122085 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Event Tickets Manager for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.6.0 does not perform authorisation or a valid nonce check on its ticket-transfer feature, which is available to unauthenticated users, allowing them to transfer other attendees' guest-checkout tickets to an… | |||
| CVE-2026-122062 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Pronamic Pay WordPress plugin before 11.1.0, Pronamic Pay doneren met Mollie WordPress plugin before 1.7.1 do not restrict access to stored form submissions through the REST API, allowing unauthenticated users to read the messages that visitors submitted through the bundled… | |||
| CVE-2026-122060 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The WP Recipe Maker WordPress plugin before 10.9.2 does not check whether the post a recipe is embedded in is password protected before returning the recipe through its REST API and structured data output, allowing unauthenticated users to read the full content of recipes in… | |||
| CVE-2026-114432 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Contact Form 7 WordPress plugin before 6.2.4 does not validate the type or extension of files uploaded through a form file field, and a flaw in its temporary-file cleanup leaves the uploaded file on disk, allowing unauthenticated users to upload arbitrary files to the site.… | |||
| CVE-2026-110963 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Userplace WordPress plugin through 1.2.0 does not perform authorization checks on an AJAX action available to unauthenticated users and publicly exposes the nonce that protects it, allowing unauthenticated attackers to create an administrator account or write arbitrary site… | |||
| CVE-2026-110132 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Sync Post With Other Site WordPress plugin before 1.9.4 does not properly authorize a content-management action for post types other than pages, allowing users with Contributor-level access or above to create and modify arbitrary custom post types, including reassigning… | |||
| CVE-2026-109925 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Productive Commerce WordPress plugin before 1.1.54 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before using it in a SQL statement, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform SQL injection attacks. | |||
| CVE-2026-106015 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Ecommerce Affiliate WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not restrict one-time password issuance and verification to the legitimate account owner, nor limit verification attempts, allowing unauthenticated attackers to take over any account, including administrators. | |||
| CVE-2026-105970 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Thanh Toán Quét Mã QR Code Tự Động WordPress plugin through 2.0.1 does not properly verify the authenticity of incoming bank-transfer payment notifications on a default installation, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark arbitrary WooCommerce orders as paid. | |||
| CVE-2026-104639 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Razorpay for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 4.8.9 does not sanitize and escape a value derived from an incoming webhook request before using it in a SQL query, allowing users able to obtain the webhook secret (administrators) to perform SQL injection attacks. | |||
| CVE-2026-104338 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Razorpay for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 4.8.9 does not perform an authorization check on one of its REST routes and derives the acting user's identity from an unauthenticated request parameter, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to cause the request to execute as… | |||
| CVE-2026-104337 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Razorpay for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 4.8.9 does not verify ownership of an order before returning a coupon discount computed against that order, allowing unauthenticated attackers to disclose the monetary value of arbitrary customer orders by enumerating order… | |||
| CVE-2026-104307 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The BackUpWordPress plugin before 3.15 does not perform a capability or nonce check on an AJAX action that cleans up its backup directory, allowing any authenticated user (Subscriber and above) to delete the BackUpWordPress plugin before 3.15's backup protection and working… | |||
| CVE-2026-103375 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Antom Payments WordPress plugin through 2.0.11 does not perform any ownership or authorisation check before returning an order's confirmation link, which contains its secret key, to unauthenticated visitors, allowing attackers to view any customer's order details, including… | |||
| CVE-2026-103303 | 0.00 | — | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Turisbook Booking System WordPress plugin through 1.3.8 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks when saving its settings, and does not sanitise and escape one of them before outputting it in an admin page, allowing unauthenticated users to perform Stored Cross-Site… | |||
| CVE-2026-114713 | Hig | 0.56 | 8.6 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The labeled-response module in UnrealIRCd 6.0.0 before 6.2.7.1 does not escape the IRCv3 "label" message tag when echoing it into replies, which allows any user on a network with two or more linked servers to inject server-to-server commands that are executed with server… | ||
| CVE-2026-124422 | Med | 0.33 | 6.1 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | SunEditor from 3.0.0 before 3.4.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in html.clean() that rebuilds iframes from data-se-iframe-holder-attrs JSON without filtering srcdoc or uppercase SRC keys. Attackers can inject crafted HTML through paste, html.set, or… | ||
| CVE-2026-123616 | Hig | 0.42 | 7.5 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | imgproxy from 3.3.0 before 4.0.16 contains an unbounded memory allocation vulnerability in the ICO loader that fails to validate the data_size field. Attackers can supply a crafted 23-byte ICO file declaring a ~4GB data_size to trigger memory exhaustion and worker crashes… | ||
| CVE-2026-123615 | Hig | 0.42 | 7.5 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | imgproxy 3.3.0 before 4.0.17 contains an out-of-bounds heap read and write in the ICO loader's BMP header reconstruction (vips_foreign_load_ico_header in vips/icoload.c) when an ICO entry declares a tiny data size, causing unvalidated header fields to be read and written past… | ||
| CVE-2026-123614 | Cri | 0.57 | 9.8 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | imgproxy from 4.0.0 before 4.0.16 contains an integer overflow in the ICO loader that allows remote attackers to trigger a heap buffer overflow via a crafted data_size value. Attackers can submit a crafted ICO image whose data_size wraps the allocation in vips/icoload.c,… | ||
| CVE-2026-123613 | Med | 0.27 | 5.3 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Rustls from 0.23.13 before 0.23.45 accepts TLS 1.3 handshake messages at the wrong encryption level when they follow a key-changing message in the same record, because Deframer::aligned does not enforce RFC 8446 record-boundary alignment. A peer or on-path attacker can pack a… | ||
| CVE-2026-123612 | Low | 0.15 | 2.3 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | rustls 0.23.44 and 0.23.45 contain an information disclosure vulnerability that sends application data buffered before the handshake completes to the client-facing server when Encrypted Client Hello is rejected. Because start_traffic() queues plaintext from… | ||
| CVE-2026-123611 | Low | 0.24 | 3.7 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | rustls before 0.23.46 contains a key exchange downgrade vulnerability that allows network attackers to poison the per-server-name key-exchange group record via an unauthenticated ServerHello. Attackers can answer one connection with a ServerHello selecting X25519, causing later… | ||
| CVE-2026-123610 | Low | 0.24 | 3.7 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | rustls before 0.23.46 contains an uncontrolled memory allocation flaw in its optional Brotli certificate decompression, which limits decompressed output size but accepts an input-selected large history window. Malicious peers can send a certificate with a five-byte Brotli header… | ||
| CVE-2026-123609 | Med | 0.26 | 4.0 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Rustls before 0.23.46 and 0.24.0-dev.1 before 0.24.0-dev.2 contains an information disclosure vulnerability where derived Debug formatting of client session values exposes secret key material. Custom ClientSessionStore implementations that log Tls12ClientSessionValue or… | ||
| CVE-2026-123608 | Hig | 0.42 | 7.5 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Hickory DNS hickory-proto from 0.3.1 before 0.26.1 contains a denial of service vulnerability in BinEncoder that allows remote attackers to exhaust CPU through quadratic-time name compression. Attackers can send malicious DNS messages with many records that add many candidate… | ||
| CVE-2026-123607 | Hig | 0.42 | 7.5 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.25.2 and hickory-net before 0.26.1 contain an unbounded loop vulnerability in DnssecDnsHandle NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation when the SOA owner is not an ancestor of the QNAME. Upstream attackers can return NoData or… | ||
| CVE-2026-123606 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The hickory-dns recursor in hickory-recursor 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.25.2 and hickory-resolver 0.26.0-alpha.1 before 0.26.2 iterates every out-of-bailiwick NS target lacking glue in a referral without any per-query work budget. Remote attackers can serve such referrals to force… | ||
| CVE-2026-123605 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.1 through 0.25.0-alpha.3 and hickory-net before 0.26.2 contain a DNSSEC validation bypass because the validator verifies an RRSIG against the DNSKEY of whatever name appears in its Signer's Name field without checking that this name is the zone… | ||
| CVE-2026-123604 | Hig | 0.42 | 7.5 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Hickory DNS hickory-resolver 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 contains an unbounded retry loop in NameServerPool::try_send, which re-queues truncated (TC) responses without checking the answering transport or counting iterations. A malicious authoritative server returning TC=1 on… | ||
| CVE-2026-123603 | Med | 0.35 | 6.5 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | hickory-proto and hickory-resolver 0.26.0 before 0.26.2, hickory-server 0.25.0-alpha.1 before 0.26.2, and hickory-recursor 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.26.0-alpha.1 fail to canonicalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses when checking deny_answers, deny_server, or AccessControlSet rules.… | ||
| CVE-2026-123602 | Med | 0.31 | 5.9 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The Hickory DNS recursor in all versions of hickory-recursor and in hickory-resolver 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 (recursor feature) is vulnerable to ghost domain names attacks because it reuses child-side apex NS RRsets cached from zone NS queries for iterative resolution. By… | ||
| CVE-2026-123601 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.25.0 through 0.26.0-alpha.1 and hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 invert the relational operators in the wrap-around branch of find_covering_record() in nsec3.rs, so the last NSEC3 record in a zone's hash ring covers every hash except its owner.… | ||
| CVE-2026-123600 | Med | 0.31 | 4.8 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.25.2 and hickory-net 0.26.0-alpha.1 before 0.26.2 contain a DNSSEC validation flaw in DnssecDnsHandle that accepts NSEC3-signed NODATA responses for zone-apex queries as secure without an NSEC3 record matching the hashed QNAME.… | ||
| CVE-2026-123599 | Low | 0.17 | 3.7 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Hickory DNS hickory-proto before 0.26.0-beta.1 and hickory-net before 0.26.2 contain a DNSSEC validation bypass because verify_rrsets() ignores DNS class when partitioning RRsets, so non-IN records skip signature verification yet are marked secure when the IN records verify.… | ||
| CVE-2026-123598 | Low | 0.24 | 3.7 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The validating recursor in Hickory DNS hickory-recursor 0.25.0 through 0.26.0-alpha.1, hickory-resolver 0.26.0-alpha.1 before 0.26.2, and hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 caches DNSSEC-bogus answers using the untrusted, attacker-supplied record TTL (capped at 24 hours)… | ||
| CVE-2026-123597 | Low | 0.17 | 3.7 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.25.0-alpha.1 through 0.26.0-alpha.1 and hickory-net before 0.26.2 contain a logic bug in DnssecDnsHandle's DS-fetch path that caches transient DS lookup errors as Bogus DNSSEC validation verdicts. An attacker who induces a SERVFAIL, REFUSED, or… | ||
| CVE-2026-123596 | Hig | 0.50 | 8.8 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Hickory DNS hickory-proto through 0.26.0-alpha.1 and hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 contain a DNSSEC validation flaw in the validating recursor's NSEC handler that accepts parent-side ancestor-delegation NSEC records as proof of nonexistence for names below the zone… | ||
| CVE-2026-123595 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.25 through 0.26.0-alpha.1 and hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 contain a DNSSEC validation flaw in the validating recursor's NSEC3 handler, which matches the closest encloser by hash alone without checking the type bitmap and so accepts… | ||
| CVE-2026-123594 | Med | 0.24 | 4.8 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Hickory DNS hickory-proto through 0.26.0-alpha.1 and hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 contain an NSEC validation flaw that returns a secure proof for NXDOMAIN responses when the covering NSEC's Next Domain Name is a strict descendant of the query name, which actually… | ||
| CVE-2026-123593 | Med | 0.24 | 4.8 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Hickory DNS hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 and hickory-proto 0.24.0 through 0.26.0-alpha.1 compare DNSKEY public keys against DNSSEC trust anchors without checking the DNSKEY record name, so an RRset made up only of trusted keys is accepted without RRSIG verification.… | ||
| CVE-2026-123592 | Med | 0.31 | 5.9 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | The hickory-net crate in Hickory DNS 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 allows DNSSEC validation bypass because Name's Hash ignores label lengths and ValidationCacheKey compares only that hash. An attacker controlling an unsigned delegation whose name differs from a signed target only… | ||
| CVE-2026-123591 | Med | 0.31 | 5.9 | — | Nov 8, 2026 | Hickory DNS hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 and hickory-proto through 0.26.0-alpha.1 fail to verify, per RFC 6840 §4.4, that an NSEC or NSEC3 record denying a DS RRset also proves the delegation's NS record exists. Attackers can reuse child-side NSEC or NSEC3 records to… |
- CVE-2026-97195Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Secure Custom Fields WordPress plugin before 6.9.8 does not sanitize a persisted field definition before emitting part of it as an HTML attribute name, allowing a user able to configure its fields to store a payload that executes as JavaScript in the browser of any user who…
- CVE-2026-97194Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Secure Custom Fields WordPress plugin before 6.9.8 does not perform a read-permission check when it renders and formats the values of its relational fields, allowing users with post-editing access (Contributor and above) to disclose the titles and non-public statuses of…
- CVE-2026-97193Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Secure Custom Fields WordPress plugin before 6.9.8 does not verify that a user is allowed to edit the target object before writing to it during bidirectional relationship synchronization, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to add or remove a reference to…
- CVE-2026-97192Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Secure Custom Fields WordPress plugin before 6.9.8 does not re-apply its field-group location rules when persisting values submitted through the post editor save path, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to write custom fields the site restricted to…
- CVE-2026-96963Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Pie Register WordPress plugin through 3.8.4.15 does not perform an authorisation check in one of its AJAX actions, allowing users with a role as low as contributor to modify existing administrator-created invitation-code records.
- CVE-2026-96961Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Pie Register WordPress plugin through 3.8.4.15 does not perform any capability, nonce or authentication check on one of its request handlers, allowing unauthenticated attackers to reset the Pie Register WordPress plugin through 3.8.4.15's settings to their defaults…
- CVE-2026-85344Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The FV Flowplayer Video Player WordPress plugin before 7.5.57.7212 does not perform any authorization check on an AJAX action that carries out a site-wide content rewrite, so any authenticated user, including subscriber-level, can trigger a bulk modification of posts they should…
- CVE-2026-122085Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Event Tickets Manager for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.6.0 does not perform authorisation or a valid nonce check on its ticket-transfer feature, which is available to unauthenticated users, allowing them to transfer other attendees' guest-checkout tickets to an…
- CVE-2026-122062Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Pronamic Pay WordPress plugin before 11.1.0, Pronamic Pay doneren met Mollie WordPress plugin before 1.7.1 do not restrict access to stored form submissions through the REST API, allowing unauthenticated users to read the messages that visitors submitted through the bundled…
- CVE-2026-122060Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The WP Recipe Maker WordPress plugin before 10.9.2 does not check whether the post a recipe is embedded in is password protected before returning the recipe through its REST API and structured data output, allowing unauthenticated users to read the full content of recipes in…
- CVE-2026-114432Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Contact Form 7 WordPress plugin before 6.2.4 does not validate the type or extension of files uploaded through a form file field, and a flaw in its temporary-file cleanup leaves the uploaded file on disk, allowing unauthenticated users to upload arbitrary files to the site.…
- CVE-2026-110963Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Userplace WordPress plugin through 1.2.0 does not perform authorization checks on an AJAX action available to unauthenticated users and publicly exposes the nonce that protects it, allowing unauthenticated attackers to create an administrator account or write arbitrary site…
- CVE-2026-110132Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Sync Post With Other Site WordPress plugin before 1.9.4 does not properly authorize a content-management action for post types other than pages, allowing users with Contributor-level access or above to create and modify arbitrary custom post types, including reassigning…
- CVE-2026-109925Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Productive Commerce WordPress plugin before 1.1.54 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before using it in a SQL statement, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform SQL injection attacks.
- CVE-2026-106015Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Ecommerce Affiliate WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not restrict one-time password issuance and verification to the legitimate account owner, nor limit verification attempts, allowing unauthenticated attackers to take over any account, including administrators.
- CVE-2026-105970Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Thanh Toán Quét Mã QR Code Tự Động WordPress plugin through 2.0.1 does not properly verify the authenticity of incoming bank-transfer payment notifications on a default installation, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark arbitrary WooCommerce orders as paid.
- CVE-2026-104639Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Razorpay for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 4.8.9 does not sanitize and escape a value derived from an incoming webhook request before using it in a SQL query, allowing users able to obtain the webhook secret (administrators) to perform SQL injection attacks.
- CVE-2026-104338Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Razorpay for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 4.8.9 does not perform an authorization check on one of its REST routes and derives the acting user's identity from an unauthenticated request parameter, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to cause the request to execute as…
- CVE-2026-104337Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Razorpay for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 4.8.9 does not verify ownership of an order before returning a coupon discount computed against that order, allowing unauthenticated attackers to disclose the monetary value of arbitrary customer orders by enumerating order…
- CVE-2026-104307Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The BackUpWordPress plugin before 3.15 does not perform a capability or nonce check on an AJAX action that cleans up its backup directory, allowing any authenticated user (Subscriber and above) to delete the BackUpWordPress plugin before 3.15's backup protection and working…
- CVE-2026-103375Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Antom Payments WordPress plugin through 2.0.11 does not perform any ownership or authorisation check before returning an order's confirmation link, which contains its secret key, to unauthenticated visitors, allowing attackers to view any customer's order details, including…
- CVE-2026-103303Nov 8, 2026risk 0.00cvss —epss —
The Turisbook Booking System WordPress plugin through 1.3.8 does not have authorisation and CSRF checks when saving its settings, and does not sanitise and escape one of them before outputting it in an admin page, allowing unauthenticated users to perform Stored Cross-Site…
- risk 0.56cvss 8.6epss —
The labeled-response module in UnrealIRCd 6.0.0 before 6.2.7.1 does not escape the IRCv3 "label" message tag when echoing it into replies, which allows any user on a network with two or more linked servers to inject server-to-server commands that are executed with server…
- risk 0.33cvss 6.1epss —
SunEditor from 3.0.0 before 3.4.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in html.clean() that rebuilds iframes from data-se-iframe-holder-attrs JSON without filtering srcdoc or uppercase SRC keys. Attackers can inject crafted HTML through paste, html.set, or…
- risk 0.42cvss 7.5epss —
imgproxy from 3.3.0 before 4.0.16 contains an unbounded memory allocation vulnerability in the ICO loader that fails to validate the data_size field. Attackers can supply a crafted 23-byte ICO file declaring a ~4GB data_size to trigger memory exhaustion and worker crashes…
- risk 0.42cvss 7.5epss —
imgproxy 3.3.0 before 4.0.17 contains an out-of-bounds heap read and write in the ICO loader's BMP header reconstruction (vips_foreign_load_ico_header in vips/icoload.c) when an ICO entry declares a tiny data size, causing unvalidated header fields to be read and written past…
- risk 0.57cvss 9.8epss —
imgproxy from 4.0.0 before 4.0.16 contains an integer overflow in the ICO loader that allows remote attackers to trigger a heap buffer overflow via a crafted data_size value. Attackers can submit a crafted ICO image whose data_size wraps the allocation in vips/icoload.c,…
- risk 0.27cvss 5.3epss —
Rustls from 0.23.13 before 0.23.45 accepts TLS 1.3 handshake messages at the wrong encryption level when they follow a key-changing message in the same record, because Deframer::aligned does not enforce RFC 8446 record-boundary alignment. A peer or on-path attacker can pack a…
- risk 0.15cvss 2.3epss —
rustls 0.23.44 and 0.23.45 contain an information disclosure vulnerability that sends application data buffered before the handshake completes to the client-facing server when Encrypted Client Hello is rejected. Because start_traffic() queues plaintext from…
- risk 0.24cvss 3.7epss —
rustls before 0.23.46 contains a key exchange downgrade vulnerability that allows network attackers to poison the per-server-name key-exchange group record via an unauthenticated ServerHello. Attackers can answer one connection with a ServerHello selecting X25519, causing later…
- risk 0.24cvss 3.7epss —
rustls before 0.23.46 contains an uncontrolled memory allocation flaw in its optional Brotli certificate decompression, which limits decompressed output size but accepts an input-selected large history window. Malicious peers can send a certificate with a five-byte Brotli header…
- risk 0.26cvss 4.0epss —
Rustls before 0.23.46 and 0.24.0-dev.1 before 0.24.0-dev.2 contains an information disclosure vulnerability where derived Debug formatting of client session values exposes secret key material. Custom ClientSessionStore implementations that log Tls12ClientSessionValue or…
- risk 0.42cvss 7.5epss —
Hickory DNS hickory-proto from 0.3.1 before 0.26.1 contains a denial of service vulnerability in BinEncoder that allows remote attackers to exhaust CPU through quadratic-time name compression. Attackers can send malicious DNS messages with many records that add many candidate…
- risk 0.42cvss 7.5epss —
Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.25.2 and hickory-net before 0.26.1 contain an unbounded loop vulnerability in DnssecDnsHandle NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation when the SOA owner is not an ancestor of the QNAME. Upstream attackers can return NoData or…
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss —
The hickory-dns recursor in hickory-recursor 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.25.2 and hickory-resolver 0.26.0-alpha.1 before 0.26.2 iterates every out-of-bailiwick NS target lacking glue in a referral without any per-query work budget. Remote attackers can serve such referrals to force…
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss —
Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.1 through 0.25.0-alpha.3 and hickory-net before 0.26.2 contain a DNSSEC validation bypass because the validator verifies an RRSIG against the DNSKEY of whatever name appears in its Signer's Name field without checking that this name is the zone…
- risk 0.42cvss 7.5epss —
Hickory DNS hickory-resolver 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 contains an unbounded retry loop in NameServerPool::try_send, which re-queues truncated (TC) responses without checking the answering transport or counting iterations. A malicious authoritative server returning TC=1 on…
- risk 0.35cvss 6.5epss —
hickory-proto and hickory-resolver 0.26.0 before 0.26.2, hickory-server 0.25.0-alpha.1 before 0.26.2, and hickory-recursor 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.26.0-alpha.1 fail to canonicalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses when checking deny_answers, deny_server, or AccessControlSet rules.…
- risk 0.31cvss 5.9epss —
The Hickory DNS recursor in all versions of hickory-recursor and in hickory-resolver 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 (recursor feature) is vulnerable to ghost domain names attacks because it reuses child-side apex NS RRsets cached from zone NS queries for iterative resolution. By…
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss —
Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.25.0 through 0.26.0-alpha.1 and hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 invert the relational operators in the wrap-around branch of find_covering_record() in nsec3.rs, so the last NSEC3 record in a zone's hash ring covers every hash except its owner.…
- risk 0.31cvss 4.8epss —
Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.25.2 and hickory-net 0.26.0-alpha.1 before 0.26.2 contain a DNSSEC validation flaw in DnssecDnsHandle that accepts NSEC3-signed NODATA responses for zone-apex queries as secure without an NSEC3 record matching the hashed QNAME.…
- risk 0.17cvss 3.7epss —
Hickory DNS hickory-proto before 0.26.0-beta.1 and hickory-net before 0.26.2 contain a DNSSEC validation bypass because verify_rrsets() ignores DNS class when partitioning RRsets, so non-IN records skip signature verification yet are marked secure when the IN records verify.…
- risk 0.24cvss 3.7epss —
The validating recursor in Hickory DNS hickory-recursor 0.25.0 through 0.26.0-alpha.1, hickory-resolver 0.26.0-alpha.1 before 0.26.2, and hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 caches DNSSEC-bogus answers using the untrusted, attacker-supplied record TTL (capped at 24 hours)…
- risk 0.17cvss 3.7epss —
Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.25.0-alpha.1 through 0.26.0-alpha.1 and hickory-net before 0.26.2 contain a logic bug in DnssecDnsHandle's DS-fetch path that caches transient DS lookup errors as Bogus DNSSEC validation verdicts. An attacker who induces a SERVFAIL, REFUSED, or…
- risk 0.50cvss 8.8epss —
Hickory DNS hickory-proto through 0.26.0-alpha.1 and hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 contain a DNSSEC validation flaw in the validating recursor's NSEC handler that accepts parent-side ancestor-delegation NSEC records as proof of nonexistence for names below the zone…
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss —
Hickory DNS hickory-proto 0.25 through 0.26.0-alpha.1 and hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 contain a DNSSEC validation flaw in the validating recursor's NSEC3 handler, which matches the closest encloser by hash alone without checking the type bitmap and so accepts…
- risk 0.24cvss 4.8epss —
Hickory DNS hickory-proto through 0.26.0-alpha.1 and hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 contain an NSEC validation flaw that returns a secure proof for NXDOMAIN responses when the covering NSEC's Next Domain Name is a strict descendant of the query name, which actually…
- risk 0.24cvss 4.8epss —
Hickory DNS hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 and hickory-proto 0.24.0 through 0.26.0-alpha.1 compare DNSKEY public keys against DNSSEC trust anchors without checking the DNSKEY record name, so an RRset made up only of trusted keys is accepted without RRSIG verification.…
- risk 0.31cvss 5.9epss —
The hickory-net crate in Hickory DNS 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 allows DNSSEC validation bypass because Name's Hash ignores label lengths and ValidationCacheKey compares only that hash. An attacker controlling an unsigned delegation whose name differs from a signed target only…
- risk 0.31cvss 5.9epss —
Hickory DNS hickory-net 0.26.0-beta.1 before 0.26.2 and hickory-proto through 0.26.0-alpha.1 fail to verify, per RFC 6840 §4.4, that an NSEC or NSEC3 record denying a DS RRset also proves the delegation's NS record exists. Attackers can reuse child-side NSEC or NSEC3 records to…