VYPR

CWE-693

Protection Mechanism Failure

PillarDraft

Description

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

This weakness covers three distinct situations. A "missing" protection mechanism occurs when the application does not define any mechanism against a certain class of attack. An "insufficient" protection mechanism might provide some defenses - for example, against the most common attacks - but it does not protect against everything that is intended. Finally, an "ignored" mechanism occurs when a mechanism is available and in active use within the product, but the developer has not applied it in some code path.

Hierarchy (View 1000)

Related attack patterns (CAPEC)

CAPEC-1 · CAPEC-107 · CAPEC-127 · CAPEC-17 · CAPEC-20 · CAPEC-22 · CAPEC-237 · CAPEC-36 · CAPEC-477 · CAPEC-480 · CAPEC-51 · CAPEC-57 · CAPEC-59 · CAPEC-65 · CAPEC-668 · CAPEC-74 · CAPEC-87

CVEs mapped to this weakness (902)

page 23 of 46
  • CVE-2022-36900HigJul 27, 2022
    risk 0.46cvss 8.2epss 0.01

    Jenkins Compuware zAdviser API Plugin 1.0.3 and earlier does not restrict execution of a controller/agent message to agents, allowing attackers able to control agent processes to retrieve Java system properties.

  • CVE-2026-57144higJun 18, 2026
    risk 0.45cvss —epss —

    ## Summary `praisonai.sandbox.SandlockSandbox` is documented and implemented as the kernel-enforced sandbox backend for untrusted code. Its `SandboxConfig.native()` path lets callers configure allowed filesystem paths and `network=False`. On systems where the optional…

  • CVE-2026-56838higJun 18, 2026
    risk 0.45cvss —epss —

    # PraisonAI `recipe.run_stream()` skips dangerous-tool policy enforcement ## Summary PraisonAI recipe execution blocks default-denied dangerous tools unless the caller explicitly passes `allow_dangerous_tools=True`. The normal `recipe.run()` path enforces this with…

  • CVE-2025-65100MedNov 19, 2025
    risk 0.45cvss —epss 0.00

    Isar is an integration system for automated root filesystem generation. In versions 0.11-rc1 and 0.11, defining ISAR_APT_SNAPSHOT_DATE alone does not set the correct timestamp value for security distribution, leading to missed security updates. This issue has been patched via…

  • CVE-2026-58767MedSep 15, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00

    In multiple functions of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-58765MedSep 15, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00

    In GPU, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-58755MedSep 15, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00

    In smmu_install_nested_ste of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-58747MedSep 15, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00

    In smmu_detach_dev of arm-smmu-v3.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-58726MedSep 15, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00

    In FsmReleaseKey of fsm.c, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-56979MedSep 15, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00

    In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-56973MedSep 15, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00

    In multiple locations, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-55304MedSep 15, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00

    In addr_remap_address_map of remap.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-55302MedSep 15, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00

    In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-0187MedSep 15, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00

    In gsa_sw_pk_hash_compare of image-auth-srv.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-0186MedSep 15, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00

    In ac_init_one_sswrp of init.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-77892MedSep 8, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.8epss 0.00

    No cwe for this issue in Windows Boot Manager allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges with a physical attack.

  • CVE-2026-82474HigAug 29, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    Sudo through 1.9.17p2 fails to apply intercept policy checks to the execveat system call in ptrace-based intercept mode. Users permitted to run specific commands can execute denied programs by calling execveat directly or through fexecve, bypassing policy enforcement and logging.

  • CVE-2026-76827MedAug 19, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.8epss 0.01

    A flaw was found in search-indexer. This vulnerability allows a registered and authenticated managed cluster to tamper with or delete another cluster's indexed search data. This is possible because the delta-sync write paths in search-indexer do not properly restrict…

  • CVE-2026-20906MedAug 11, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00

    Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) Neural Compressor software before version v3.6 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation…

  • CVE-2026-17919MedJul 30, 2026
    risk 0.44cvss 6.8epss 0.00

    Insufficient policy enforcement in Enterprise in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 151.0.7922.72 allowed a local attacker to perform privilege escalation via physical access to the device. (Chromium security severity: Low)