VYPR

CWE-693

Protection Mechanism Failure

PillarDraft

Description

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

This weakness covers three distinct situations. A "missing" protection mechanism occurs when the application does not define any mechanism against a certain class of attack. An "insufficient" protection mechanism might provide some defenses - for example, against the most common attacks - but it does not protect against everything that is intended. Finally, an "ignored" mechanism occurs when a mechanism is available and in active use within the product, but the developer has not applied it in some code path.

Hierarchy (View 1000)

Related attack patterns (CAPEC)

CAPEC-1 · CAPEC-107 · CAPEC-127 · CAPEC-17 · CAPEC-20 · CAPEC-22 · CAPEC-237 · CAPEC-36 · CAPEC-477 · CAPEC-480 · CAPEC-51 · CAPEC-57 · CAPEC-59 · CAPEC-65 · CAPEC-668 · CAPEC-74 · CAPEC-87

CVEs mapped to this weakness (894)

page 15 of 45
  • CVE-2026-0087HigJun 1, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In approvalLevelForDomainInternal of DomainVerificationService.java, there is a possible way to hijack an arbitrary app link due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not…

  • CVE-2026-0077HigJun 1, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In resumeConfigurationDispatch of ActivityRecord.java, there is a possible background application launch (bal) due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…

  • CVE-2026-0045HigJun 1, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In bta_jv_rfcomm_connect of bta_jv_act.cc, there is a possible bypass of bonding for a secure connection due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…

  • CVE-2025-48652HigJun 1, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In performPreInstallChecks of InstallRepository.kt, there is a possible way to bypass MDM policy due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-48649HigJun 1, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In multiple locations, there is a possible way to reset user-selected permissions selections due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-7913HigMay 6, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools in Google Chrome on Android prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a local attacker to perform privilege escalation via a malicious file. (Chromium security severity: High)

  • CVE-2025-48653HigMar 2, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In loadDataAndPostValue of multiple files, there is a possible way to obscure permission usage due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-46291HigDec 17, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    A logic issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.4, macOS Tahoe 26.2. An app may bypass Gatekeeper checks.

  • CVE-2025-67460HigDec 10, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    Protection Mechanism Failure of Software Downgrade in Zoom Rooms for Windows before 6.6.0 may allow an unauthenticated user to conduct an escalation of privilege via local access.

  • CVE-2025-26439HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In getComponentName of AccessibilitySettingsUtils.java, there is a possible way to for a malicious Talkback service to be enabled instead of the system component due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution…

  • CVE-2025-26431HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In setupAccessibilityServices of AccessibilityFragment.java, there is a possible way to hide an enabled accessibility service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is…

  • CVE-2025-48546HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In checkPermissions of SafeActivityOptions.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-48531HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In getCallingPackageName of CredentialStorage, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-48522HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In setDisplayName of AssociationRequest.java, there is a possible way for an app to retain CDM association due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…

  • CVE-2025-32331HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In showDismissibleKeyguard of KeyguardService.java, there is a possible way to bypass app pinning due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-26464HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In executeAppFunction of AppSearchManagerService.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…

  • CVE-2025-0089HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In multiple locations, there is a possible way to hijack the Launcher app due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-26458HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In multiple functions of LocationProviderManager.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…

  • CVE-2025-26444HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In onHandleForceStop of VoiceInteractionManagerService.java, there is a bug that could cause the system to incorrectly revert to the default assistant application when a user-selected assistant is forcibly stopped due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local…

  • CVE-2025-36905HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In gxp_mapping_create of gxp_mapping.c, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.