VYPR

CWE-693

Protection Mechanism Failure

PillarDraft

Description

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

This weakness covers three distinct situations. A "missing" protection mechanism occurs when the application does not define any mechanism against a certain class of attack. An "insufficient" protection mechanism might provide some defenses - for example, against the most common attacks - but it does not protect against everything that is intended. Finally, an "ignored" mechanism occurs when a mechanism is available and in active use within the product, but the developer has not applied it in some code path.

Hierarchy (View 1000)

Related attack patterns (CAPEC)

CAPEC-1 · CAPEC-107 · CAPEC-127 · CAPEC-17 · CAPEC-20 · CAPEC-22 · CAPEC-237 · CAPEC-36 · CAPEC-477 · CAPEC-480 · CAPEC-51 · CAPEC-57 · CAPEC-59 · CAPEC-65 · CAPEC-668 · CAPEC-74 · CAPEC-87

CVEs mapped to this weakness (894)

page 14 of 45
  • CVE-2026-28642HigSep 8, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In executeRequest of ActivityStarter.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-28639HigSep 8, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In rw_mfc_handle_read_op of rw_mfc.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-28634HigSep 8, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In handleUssdRequest of PhoneInterfaceManager.java, there is a possible way to send a USSD request without permission due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed…

  • CVE-2026-28612HigSep 8, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In resolveActivity of ActivityStarter.java, there is a possible way to perform Intent Redirection attacks due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…

  • CVE-2026-28599HigSep 8, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In addCreatorToken of ActivityManagerService.java, there is a possible Intent Redirection Bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-28594HigSep 8, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In multiple locations, there is a possible use after free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-28583HigSep 8, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In validate_camera_metadata_structure of camera_metadata.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a logical error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…

  • CVE-2026-0084HigSep 8, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In multiple functions of HostEmulationManager.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2026-0065HigSep 8, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In areBackgroundActivityStartsAllowed of BackgroundLaunchProcessController.java, there is a possible unintended way to launch activities in the background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed.…

  • CVE-2026-69278HigAug 11, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    Incorrect authorization in Visual Studio Code allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

  • CVE-2026-54981HigAug 11, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    Inclusion of functionality from untrusted control sphere in Visual Studio Code - Python extension allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

  • CVE-2026-28912HigJul 27, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.7, macOS Tahoe 26.6. A user may be able to elevate privileges.

  • CVE-2026-0278HigJul 9, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    Multiple protection mechanism failures in the Prisma Access Agent Data Loss Prevention (DLP) component for Windows allow a local user to bypass DLP policy enforcement controls. The Prisma Access Agent on macOS is not affected.

  • CVE-2026-12214HigJun 15, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    A security flaw has been discovered in Qihoo 360 Total Security 6.0. This vulnerability affects the function RpcStringBindingComposeW of the component Nucleus Engine Monitoring Logic. Performing a manipulation of the argument NetworkAddr results in protection mechanism failure.…

  • CVE-2026-48575HigJun 9, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.9epss 0.00

    Protection mechanism failure in Windows Secure Boot allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

  • CVE-2026-48570HigJun 9, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.9epss 0.00

    Protection mechanism failure in Windows Secure Boot allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

  • CVE-2026-48568HigJun 9, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.9epss 0.00

    Protection mechanism failure in Windows Secure Boot allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

  • CVE-2026-47656HigJun 9, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.9epss 0.00

    Protection mechanism failure in Windows Boot Manager allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

  • CVE-2026-45656HigJun 9, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    Protection mechanism failure in Windows UEFI allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

  • CVE-2026-45588HigJun 9, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.9epss 0.00

    Protection mechanism failure in Windows Secure Boot allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.