VYPR

CWE-20

Improper Input Validation

ClassStableLikelihood: High

Description

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly.

Hierarchy (View 1000)

Related attack patterns (CAPEC)

CAPEC-10 · CAPEC-101 · CAPEC-104 · CAPEC-108 · CAPEC-109 · CAPEC-110 · CAPEC-120 · CAPEC-13 · CAPEC-135 · CAPEC-136 · CAPEC-14 · CAPEC-153 · CAPEC-182 · CAPEC-209 · CAPEC-22 · CAPEC-23 · CAPEC-230 · CAPEC-231 · CAPEC-24 · CAPEC-250 · CAPEC-261 · CAPEC-267 · CAPEC-28 · CAPEC-3 · CAPEC-31 · CAPEC-42 · CAPEC-43 · CAPEC-45 · CAPEC-46 · CAPEC-47 · CAPEC-473 · CAPEC-52 · CAPEC-53 · CAPEC-588 · CAPEC-63 · CAPEC-64 · CAPEC-664 · CAPEC-67 · CAPEC-7 · CAPEC-71 · CAPEC-72 · CAPEC-73 · CAPEC-78 · CAPEC-79 · CAPEC-8 · CAPEC-80 · CAPEC-81 · CAPEC-83 · CAPEC-85 · CAPEC-88 · CAPEC-9

CVEs mapped to this weakness (5,718)

page 50 of 286
  • CVE-2017-3873HigMay 16, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.00

    A vulnerability in the Plug-and-Play (PnP) subsystem of the Cisco Aironet 1800, 2800, and 3800 Series Access Points running a Lightweight Access Point (AP) or Mobility Express image could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of PnP server responses. The PnP feature is only active while the device does not contain a configuration, such as a first time boot or after a factory reset has been issued. An attacker with the ability to respond to PnP configuration requests from the affected device can exploit the vulnerability by returning malicious PnP responses. If a Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller - Enterprise Module (APIC-EM) is available on the network, the attacker would need to exploit the issue in the short window before a valid PnP response was received. If successful, the attacker could gain the ability to execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the underlying operating system of the device. Cisco has confirmed that the only vulnerable software version is 8.3.102.0. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvb42386.

  • CVE-2017-3825HigMay 16, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.00

    A vulnerability in the ICMP ingress packet processing of Cisco TelePresence Collaboration Endpoint (CE) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the TelePresence endpoint to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to incomplete input validation for the size of a received ICMP packet. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted ICMP packet to the local IP address of the targeted endpoint. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a DoS of the TelePresence endpoint, during which time calls could be dropped. This vulnerability would affect either IPv4 or IPv6 ICMP traffic. This vulnerability affects the following Cisco TelePresence products when running software release CE8.1.1, CE8.2.0, CE8.2.1, CE8.2.2, CE 8.3.0, or CE8.3.1: Spark Room OS, TelePresence DX Series, TelePresence MX Series, TelePresence SX Quick Set Series, TelePresence SX Series. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvb95396.

  • CVE-2017-0212HigMay 12, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.6epss 0.00

    Windows Hyper-V allows an elevation of privilege vulnerability when Microsoft Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016 fail to properly validate vSMB packet data, aka "Windows Hyper-V vSMB Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability".

  • CVE-2016-7476HigMay 11, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01

    The Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) in F5 BIG-IP LTM, AAM, AFM, APM, ASM, GTM, Link Controller, PEM, PSM, and WebSafe 11.6.0 before 11.6.0 HF6, 11.5.0 before 11.5.3 HF2, and 11.3.0 before 11.4.1 HF10 may suffer from a memory leak while handling certain types of TCP traffic. Remote attackers may cause a denial of service (DoS) by way of a crafted TCP packet.

  • CVE-2016-9253HigMay 9, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01

    In F5 BIG-IP 12.1.0 through 12.1.2, specific websocket traffic patterns may cause a disruption of service for virtual servers configured to use the websocket profile.

  • CVE-2017-3733HigMay 4, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.03

    During a renegotiation handshake if the Encrypt-Then-Mac extension is negotiated where it was not in the original handshake (or vice-versa) then this can cause OpenSSL 1.1.0 before 1.1.0e to crash (dependent on ciphersuite). Both clients and servers are affected.

  • CVE-2017-8396HigMay 1, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.00

    The Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd), as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.28, is vulnerable to an invalid read of size 1 because the existing reloc offset range tests didn't catch small negative offsets less than the size of the reloc field. This vulnerability causes programs that conduct an analysis of binary programs using the libbfd library, such as objdump, to crash.

  • CVE-2017-2153HigApr 28, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01

    SEIL/x86 Fuji 1.70 to 5.62, SEIL/BPV4 5.00 to 5.62, SEIL/X1 1.30 to 5.62, SEIL/X2 1.30 to 5.62, SEIL/B1 1.00 to 5.62 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via specially crafted IPv4 UDP packets.

  • CVE-2017-2313HigApr 24, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01

    Juniper Networks devices running affected Junos OS versions may be impacted by the receipt of a crafted BGP UPDATE which can lead to an rpd (routing process daemon) crash and restart. Repeated crashes of the rpd daemon can result in an extended denial of service condition. The affected Junos OS versions are: 15.1 prior to 15.1F2-S15, 15.1F5-S7, 15.1F6-S5, 15.1F7, 15.1R4-S7, 15.1R5-S2, 15.1R6; 15.1X49 prior to 15.1X49-D78, 15.1X49-D80; 15.1X53 prior to 15.1X53-D230, 15.1X53-D63, 15.1X53-D70; 16.1 prior to 16.1R3-S3, 16.1R4; 16.2 prior to 16.2R1-S3, 16.2R2; Releases prior to Junos OS 15.1 are unaffected by this vulnerability. 17.1R1, 17.2R1, and all subsequent releases have a resolution for this vulnerability.

  • CVE-2017-7892HigApr 17, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01

    Sandstorm Cap'n Proto before 0.5.3.1 allows remote crashes related to a compiler optimization. A remote attacker can trigger a segfault in a 32-bit libcapnp application because Cap'n Proto relies on pointer arithmetic calculations that overflow. An example compiler with optimization that elides a bounds check in such calculations is Apple LLVM version 8.1.0 (clang-802.0.41). The attack vector is a crafted far pointer within a message.

  • CVE-2017-5659HigApr 17, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.02

    Apache Traffic Server before 6.2.1 generates a coredump when there is a mismatch between content length and chunked encoding.

  • CVE-2017-7408HigApr 14, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01

    Palo Alto Networks Traps ESM Console before 3.4.4 allows attackers to cause a denial of service by leveraging improper validation of requests to revoke a Traps agent license.

  • CVE-2015-4646HigApr 13, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01

    (1) unsquash-1.c, (2) unsquash-2.c, (3) unsquash-3.c, and (4) unsquash-4.c in Squashfs and sasquatch allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted input.

  • CVE-2017-7747HigApr 12, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.02

    In Wireshark 2.2.0 to 2.2.5 and 2.0.0 to 2.0.11, the PacketBB dissector could crash, triggered by packet injection or a malformed capture file. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-packetbb.c by restricting additions to the protocol tree.

  • CVE-2017-6059HigApr 12, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.02

    Mod_auth_openidc.c in the Ping Identity OpenID Connect authentication module for Apache (aka mod_auth_openidc) before 2.14 allows remote attackers to spoof page content via a malicious URL provided to the user, which triggers an invalid request.

  • CVE-2017-0181HigApr 12, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.6epss 0.00

    A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V Network Switch running on a Windows 10 or Windows Server 2016 host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0162, CVE-2017-0163, and CVE-2017-0180.

  • CVE-2017-0180HigApr 12, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.6epss 0.00

    A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V Network Switch running on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0162, CVE-2017-0163, and CVE-2017-0181.

  • CVE-2017-0163HigApr 12, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.6epss 0.00

    A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V Network Switch running on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0162, CVE-2017-0180, and CVE-2017-0181.

  • CVE-2017-0162HigApr 12, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.6epss 0.00

    A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Windows Hyper-V Network Switch running on a Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, or Windows Server 2016 host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka "Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0163, CVE-2017-0180, and CVE-2017-0181.

  • CVE-2016-7958HigApr 12, 2017
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.00

    In Wireshark 2.2.0, the NCP dissector could crash, triggered by packet injection or a malformed capture file. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/CMakeLists.txt by registering this dissector.