Zammad
Products
1- 91 CVEs
Recent CVEs
91| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-48021 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.01 | Feb 3, 2023 | A vulnerability in Zammad v5.3.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or escalate privileges via a crafted message sent to the server. | ||
| CVE-2022-35490 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.01 | Aug 8, 2022 | Zammad 5.2.0 is vulnerable to privilege escalation. Zammad has a prevention against brute-force attacks trying to guess login credentials. After a configurable amount of attempts, users are invalidated and logins prevented. An attacker might work around this prevention, enabling… | ||
| CVE-2021-42090 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.02 | Oct 7, 2021 | An issue was discovered in Zammad before 4.1.1. The Form functionality allows remote code execution because deserialization is mishandled. | ||
| CVE-2021-42094 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.02 | Oct 7, 2021 | An issue was discovered in Zammad before 4.1.1. Command Injection can occur via custom Packages. | ||
| CVE-2020-26030 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.01 | Dec 28, 2020 | An issue was discovered in Zammad before 3.4.1. There is an authentication bypass in the SSO endpoint via a crafted header, when SSO is not configured. An attacker can create a valid and authenticated session that can be used to perform any actions in the name of other users. | ||
| CVE-2017-6080 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.01 | Mar 13, 2017 | An issue was discovered in Zammad before 1.0.4, 1.1.x before 1.1.3, and 1.2.x before 1.2.1, caused by lack of a protection mechanism involving HTTP Access-Control headers. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker can send cross-domain requests directly to the REST API for users… | ||
| CVE-2017-5619 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.02 | Mar 13, 2017 | An issue was discovered in Zammad before 1.0.4, 1.1.x before 1.1.3, and 1.2.x before 1.2.1. Attackers can login with the hashed password itself (e.g., from the DB) instead of the valid password string. | ||
| CVE-2024-33668 | Cri | 0.59 | 9.1 | 0.00 | Apr 26, 2024 | An issue was discovered in Zammad before 6.3.0. The Zammad Upload Cache uses insecure, partially guessable FormIDs to identify content. An attacker could try to brute force them to upload malicious content to article drafts they have no access to. | ||
| CVE-2022-27332 | Cri | 0.59 | 9.1 | 0.01 | Apr 27, 2022 | An access control issue in Zammad v5.0.3 allows attackers to write entries to the CTI caller log without authentication. This vulnerability can allow attackers to execute phishing attacks or cause a Denial of Service (DoS). | ||
| CVE-2021-42091 | Cri | 0.59 | 9.1 | 0.01 | Oct 7, 2021 | An issue was discovered in Zammad before 4.1.1. SSRF can occur via GitHub or GitLab integration. | ||
| CVE-2021-42086 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | 0.01 | Oct 7, 2021 | An issue was discovered in Zammad before 4.1.1. An Agent account can modify account data, and gain admin access, via a crafted request. | ||
| CVE-2017-6081 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | 0.01 | Mar 13, 2017 | A CSRF issue was discovered in Zammad before 1.0.4, 1.1.x before 1.1.3, and 1.2.x before 1.2.1. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker can send cross-domain requests directly to the REST API for users with a valid session cookie. | ||
| CVE-2024-33666 | Hig | 0.56 | 8.6 | 0.01 | Apr 26, 2024 | An issue was discovered in Zammad before 6.3.0. Users with customer access to a ticket could have accessed time accounting details of this ticket via the API. This data should be available only to agents. | ||
| CVE-2021-43145 | Hig | 0.53 | 8.1 | 0.01 | Feb 4, 2022 | With certain LDAP configurations, Zammad 5.0.1 was found to be vulnerable to unauthorized access with existing user accounts. | ||
| CVE-2023-50455 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Dec 10, 2023 | An issue was discovered in Zammad before 6.2.0. Due to lack of rate limiting in the "email address verification" feature, an attacker could send many requests for a known address to cause Denial Of Service (generation of many emails, which would also spam the victim). | ||
| CVE-2022-35488 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Aug 8, 2022 | In Zammad 5.2.0, an attacker could manipulate the rate limiting in the 'forgot password' feature of Zammad, and thereby send many requests for a known account to cause Denial Of Service by many generated emails which would also spam the victim. | ||
| CVE-2022-35487 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Aug 8, 2022 | Zammad 5.2.0 suffers from Incorrect Access Control. Zammad did not correctly perform authorization on certain attachment endpoints. This could be abused by an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to attachments, such as emails or attached files. | ||
| CVE-2022-29701 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Apr 27, 2022 | A lack of rate limiting in the 'forgot password' feature of Zammad v5.1.0 allows attackers to send an excessive amount of reset requests for a legitimate user, leading to a possible Denial of Service (DoS) via a large amount of generated e-mail messages. | ||
| CVE-2022-29700 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Apr 27, 2022 | A lack of password length restriction in Zammad v5.1.0 allows for the creation of extremely long passwords which can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) during password verification. | ||
| CVE-2021-42089 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Oct 7, 2021 | An issue was discovered in Zammad before 4.1.1. The REST API discloses sensitive information. |
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.01
A vulnerability in Zammad v5.3.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code or escalate privileges via a crafted message sent to the server.
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.01
Zammad 5.2.0 is vulnerable to privilege escalation. Zammad has a prevention against brute-force attacks trying to guess login credentials. After a configurable amount of attempts, users are invalidated and logins prevented. An attacker might work around this prevention, enabling…
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.02
An issue was discovered in Zammad before 4.1.1. The Form functionality allows remote code execution because deserialization is mishandled.
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.02
An issue was discovered in Zammad before 4.1.1. Command Injection can occur via custom Packages.
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.01
An issue was discovered in Zammad before 3.4.1. There is an authentication bypass in the SSO endpoint via a crafted header, when SSO is not configured. An attacker can create a valid and authenticated session that can be used to perform any actions in the name of other users.
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.01
An issue was discovered in Zammad before 1.0.4, 1.1.x before 1.1.3, and 1.2.x before 1.2.1, caused by lack of a protection mechanism involving HTTP Access-Control headers. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker can send cross-domain requests directly to the REST API for users…
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.02
An issue was discovered in Zammad before 1.0.4, 1.1.x before 1.1.3, and 1.2.x before 1.2.1. Attackers can login with the hashed password itself (e.g., from the DB) instead of the valid password string.
- risk 0.59cvss 9.1epss 0.00
An issue was discovered in Zammad before 6.3.0. The Zammad Upload Cache uses insecure, partially guessable FormIDs to identify content. An attacker could try to brute force them to upload malicious content to article drafts they have no access to.
- risk 0.59cvss 9.1epss 0.01
An access control issue in Zammad v5.0.3 allows attackers to write entries to the CTI caller log without authentication. This vulnerability can allow attackers to execute phishing attacks or cause a Denial of Service (DoS).
- risk 0.59cvss 9.1epss 0.01
An issue was discovered in Zammad before 4.1.1. SSRF can occur via GitHub or GitLab integration.
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss 0.01
An issue was discovered in Zammad before 4.1.1. An Agent account can modify account data, and gain admin access, via a crafted request.
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss 0.01
A CSRF issue was discovered in Zammad before 1.0.4, 1.1.x before 1.1.3, and 1.2.x before 1.2.1. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker can send cross-domain requests directly to the REST API for users with a valid session cookie.
- risk 0.56cvss 8.6epss 0.01
An issue was discovered in Zammad before 6.3.0. Users with customer access to a ticket could have accessed time accounting details of this ticket via the API. This data should be available only to agents.
- risk 0.53cvss 8.1epss 0.01
With certain LDAP configurations, Zammad 5.0.1 was found to be vulnerable to unauthorized access with existing user accounts.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
An issue was discovered in Zammad before 6.2.0. Due to lack of rate limiting in the "email address verification" feature, an attacker could send many requests for a known address to cause Denial Of Service (generation of many emails, which would also spam the victim).
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
In Zammad 5.2.0, an attacker could manipulate the rate limiting in the 'forgot password' feature of Zammad, and thereby send many requests for a known account to cause Denial Of Service by many generated emails which would also spam the victim.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
Zammad 5.2.0 suffers from Incorrect Access Control. Zammad did not correctly perform authorization on certain attachment endpoints. This could be abused by an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to attachments, such as emails or attached files.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
A lack of rate limiting in the 'forgot password' feature of Zammad v5.1.0 allows attackers to send an excessive amount of reset requests for a legitimate user, leading to a possible Denial of Service (DoS) via a large amount of generated e-mail messages.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
A lack of password length restriction in Zammad v5.1.0 allows for the creation of extremely long passwords which can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) during password verification.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
An issue was discovered in Zammad before 4.1.1. The REST API discloses sensitive information.