Vendor CVEs
WolfSSL
All CVEs
163 total · sorted by risk| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-10592 | Med | 0.27 | 5.3 | 0.00 | Jun 25, 2026 | Certificates with wildcard DNS SANs (e.g. *.example.com) bypassed CA name-constraint checks. A certificate with a wildcard DNS SAN that should be rejected by the issuing CA's permitted/excluded DNS name constraints could be accepted. | ||
| CVE-2026-5504 | Med | 0.27 | 5.3 | 0.00 | Apr 9, 2026 | A padding oracle exists in wolfSSL's PKCS7 CBC decryption that could allow an attacker to recover plaintext through repeated decryption queries with modified ciphertext. In previous versions of wolfSSL the interior padding bytes are not validated. | ||
| CVE-2026-5772 | Med | 0.27 | 5.3 | 0.00 | Apr 9, 2026 | A 1-byte stack buffer over-read was identified in the MatchDomainName function (src/internal.c) during wildcard hostname validation when the LEFT_MOST_WILDCARD_ONLY flag is active. If a wildcard * exhausts the entire hostname string, the function reads one byte past the buffer… | ||
| CVE-2026-3503 | Med | 0.27 | 5.2 | 0.00 | Mar 19, 2026 | Protection mechanism failure in wolfCrypt post-quantum implementations (ML-KEM and ML-DSA) in wolfSSL on ARM Cortex-M microcontrollers allows a physical attacker to compromise key material and/or cryptographic outcomes via induced transient faults that corrupt or redirect… | ||
| CVE-2026-1005 | Med | 0.27 | 5.3 | 0.00 | Mar 19, 2026 | Integer underflow in wolfSSL packet sniffer <= 5.8.4 allows an attacker to cause a buffer overflow in the AEAD decryption path by injecting a TLS record shorter than the explicit IV plus authentication tag into traffic inspected by ssl_DecodePacket. The underflow wraps a 16-bit… | ||
| CVE-2024-1543 | Med | 0.27 | 4.1 | 0.00 | Aug 29, 2024 | The side-channel protected T-Table implementation in wolfSSL up to version 5.6.5 protects against a side-channel attacker with cache-line resolution. In a controlled environment such as Intel SGX, an attacker can gain a per instruction sub-cache-line resolution allowing them to… | ||
| CVE-2026-3580 | Med | 0.24 | 4.7 | 0.00 | Mar 19, 2026 | In wolfSSL 5.8.4, constant-time masking logic in sp_256_get_entry_256_9 is optimized into conditional branches (bnez) by GCC when targeting RISC-V RV32I with -O3. This transformation breaks the side-channel resistance of ECC scalar multiplication, potentially allowing a local… | ||
| CVE-2026-6412 | Med | 0.21 | 4.3 | 0.00 | Jun 25, 2026 | Certificate policy and RFC 8446 compliance concerns regarding the continued acceptance of SHA-1/MD5 in certificate processing. | ||
| CVE-2026-0930 | Med | 0.21 | 4.3 | 0.00 | Apr 20, 2026 | Potential read out of bounds case with wolfSSHd on Windows while handling a terminal resize request. An authenticated user could trigger the out of bounds read after establishing a connection which would leak the adjacent stack memory to the pseudo-console output. | ||
| CVE-2026-5448 | Med | 0.21 | 4.3 | 0.00 | Apr 10, 2026 | X.509 date buffer overflow in wolfSSL_X509_notAfter / wolfSSL_X509_notBefore. A buffer overflow may occur when parsing date fields from a crafted X.509 certificate via the compatibility layer API. This is only triggered when calling these two APIs directly from an application,… | ||
| CVE-2026-5507 | Med | 0.19 | 4.0 | 0.00 | Apr 9, 2026 | When restoring a session from cache, a pointer from the serialized session data is used in a free operation without validation. An attacker who can poison the session cache could trigger an arbitrary free. Exploitation requires the ability to inject a crafted session into the… | ||
| CVE-2026-4159 | Low | 0.14 | 3.3 | 0.00 | Mar 19, 2026 | 1-byte OOB heap read in wc_PKCS7_DecodeEnvelopedData via zero-length encrypted content. A vulnerability existed in wolfSSL 5.8.4 and earlier, where a 1-byte out-of-bounds heap read in wc_PKCS7_DecodeEnvelopedData could be triggered by a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with… | ||
| CVE-2026-3230 | Low | 0.11 | 2.7 | 0.00 | Mar 19, 2026 | Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required… | ||
| CVE-2009-4484 | 0.09 | — | 0.70 | Dec 30, 2009 | Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the CertDecoder::GetName function in src/asn.cpp in TaoCrypt in yaSSL before 1.9.9, as used in mysqld in MySQL 5.0.x before 5.0.90, MySQL 5.1.x before 5.1.43, MySQL 5.5.x through 5.5.0-m2, and other products, allow remote attackers to… | |||
| CVE-2025-7844 | Low | 0.07 | — | 0.00 | Aug 4, 2025 | Exporting a TPM based RSA key larger than 2048 bits from the TPM could overrun a stack buffer if the default `MAX_RSA_KEY_BITS=2048` is used. If your TPM 2.0 module supports RSA key sizes larger than 2048 bit and your applications supports creating or importing an RSA private or… | ||
| CVE-2025-15382 | Hig | 0.00 | 8.1 | 0.00 | Jan 6, 2026 | A heap buffer over-read vulnerability exists in the wolfSSH_CleanPath() function in wolfSSH. An authenticated remote attacker can trigger the issue via crafted SCP path input containing '/./' sequences, resulting in a heap over read by 1 byte. | ||
| CVE-2025-14942 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.8 | 0.00 | Jan 6, 2026 | wolfSSH’s key exchange state machine can be manipulated to leak the client’s password in the clear, trick the client to send a bogus signature, or trick the client into skipping user authentication. This affects client applications with wolfSSH version 1.4.21 and earlier.… | ||
| CVE-2025-13912 | Low | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | Dec 11, 2025 | Multiple constant-time implementations in wolfSSL before version 5.8.4 may be transformed into non-constant-time binary by LLVM optimizations, which can potentially result in observable timing discrepancies and lead to information disclosure through timing side-channel attacks. | ||
| CVE-2025-12889 | Med | 0.00 | 5.4 | 0.00 | Nov 22, 2025 | With TLS 1.2 connections a client can use any digest, specifically a weaker digest that is supported, rather than those in the CertificateRequest. | ||
| CVE-2025-12888 | Hig | 0.00 | 7.5 | 0.00 | Nov 21, 2025 | Vulnerability in X25519 constant-time cryptographic implementations due to timing side channels introduced by compiler optimizations and CPU architecture limitations, specifically with the Xtensa-based ESP32 chips. If targeting Xtensa it is recommended to use the low memory… | ||
| CVE-2025-11936 | Med | 0.00 | 5.3 | 0.00 | Nov 21, 2025 | Improper input validation in the TLS 1.3 KeyShareEntry parsing in wolfSSL v5.8.2 on multiple platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial-of-service by sending a crafted ClientHello message containing duplicate KeyShareEntry values for the same supported… | ||
| CVE-2025-11934 | Low | 0.00 | 2.7 | 0.00 | Nov 21, 2025 | Improper input validation in the TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify signature algorithm negotiation in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows for downgrading the signature algorithm used. For example when a client sends ECDSA P521 as the supported signature algorithm the… | ||
| CVE-2025-11933 | Med | 0.00 | 6.5 | 0.00 | Nov 21, 2025 | Improper Input Validation in the TLS 1.3 CKS extension parsing in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to potentially cause a denial-of-service via a crafted ClientHello message with duplicate CKS extensions. | ||
| CVE-2025-11932 | Med | 0.00 | 4.3 | 0.00 | Nov 21, 2025 | The server previously verified the TLS 1.3 PSK binder using a non-constant time method which could potentially leak information about the PSK binder | ||
| CVE-2025-11931 | Hig | 0.00 | 8.2 | 0.00 | Nov 21, 2025 | Integer Underflow Leads to Out-of-Bounds Access in XChaCha20-Poly1305 Decrypt. This issue is hit specifically with a call to the function wc_XChaCha20Poly1305_Decrypt() which is not used with TLS connections, only from direct calls from an application. | ||
| CVE-2025-11935 | Hig | 0.00 | 7.5 | 0.00 | Nov 21, 2025 | With TLS 1.3 pre-shared key (PSK) a malicious or faulty server could ignore the request for PFS (perfect forward secrecy) and the client would continue on with the connection using PSK without PFS. This happened when a server responded to a ClientHello containing psk_dhe_ke… | ||
| CVE-2025-11625 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.8 | 0.00 | Oct 21, 2025 | Improper host authentication vulnerability in wolfSSH version 1.4.20 and earlier clients that allows authentication bypass and leaking of clients credentials. | ||
| CVE-2025-11624 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.8 | 0.00 | Oct 21, 2025 | Potential stack buffer overwrite on the SFTP server side when receiving a malicious packet that has a handle size larger than the system handle or file descriptor size, but smaller than max handle size allowed. | ||
| CVE-2024-1545 | Med | 0.00 | 5.9 | 0.01 | Aug 29, 2024 | Fault Injection vulnerability in RsaPrivateDecryption function in wolfssl/wolfcrypt/src/rsa.c in WolfSSL wolfssl5.6.6 on Linux/Windows allows remote attacker co-resides in the same system with a victim process to disclose information and escalate privileges via Rowhammer fault… | ||
| CVE-2024-5991 | Hig | 0.00 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Aug 27, 2024 | In function MatchDomainName(), input param str is treated as a NULL terminated string despite being user provided and unchecked. Specifically, the function X509_check_host() takes in a pointer and length to check against, with no requirements that it be NULL terminated. If a… | ||
| CVE-2024-1544 | Med | 0.00 | 4.1 | 0.00 | Aug 27, 2024 | Generating the ECDSA nonce k samples a random number r and then truncates this randomness with a modular reduction mod n where n is the order of the elliptic curve. Meaning k = r mod n. The division used during the reduction estimates a factor q_e by dividing the upper two … | ||
| CVE-2024-0901 | Hig | 0.00 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Mar 25, 2024 | Remotely executed SEGV and out of bounds read allows malicious packet sender to crash or cause an out of bounds read via sending a malformed packet with the correct length. | ||
| CVE-2024-2873 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.1 | 0.01 | Mar 25, 2024 | A vulnerability was found in wolfSSH's server-side state machine before versions 1.4.17. A malicious client could create channels without first performing user authentication, resulting in unauthorized access. | ||
| CVE-2023-6936 | Med | 0.00 | 5.3 | 0.01 | Feb 20, 2024 | In wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6, if callback functions are enabled (via the WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS flag), then a malicious TLS client or network attacker can trigger a buffer over-read on the heap of 5 bytes (WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS is only intended for debugging). | ||
| CVE-2023-6937 | Med | 0.00 | 5.3 | 0.01 | Feb 15, 2024 | wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one (D)TLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine (D)TLS messages using different keys into one (D)TLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in (D)TLS 1.3, it was possible that an… | ||
| CVE-2023-3724 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.1 | 0.01 | Jul 17, 2023 | If a TLS 1.3 client gets neither a PSK (pre shared key) extension nor a KSE (key share extension) when connecting to a malicious server, a default predictable buffer gets used for the IKM (Input Keying Material) value when generating the session master secret. Using a… | ||
| CVE-2022-38153 | Med | 0.00 | 5.9 | 0.02 | Aug 31, 2022 | An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.5.0 (when --enable-session-ticket is used); however, only version 5.3.0 is exploitable. Man-in-the-middle attackers or a malicious server can crash TLS 1.2 clients during a handshake. If an attacker injects a large ticket (more than… | ||
| CVE-2022-38152 | Hig | 0.00 | 7.5 | 0.02 | Aug 31, 2022 | An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.5.0. When a TLS 1.3 client connects to a wolfSSL server and SSL_clear is called on its session, the server crashes with a segmentation fault. This occurs in the second session, which is created through TLS session resumption and reuses… | ||
| CVE-2022-32073 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.8 | 0.02 | Jul 13, 2022 | WolfSSH v1.4.7 was discovered to contain an integer overflow via the function wolfSSH_SFTP_RecvRMDIR. | ||
| CVE-2022-25640 | Hig | 0.00 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Feb 24, 2022 | In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, a TLS 1.3 server cannot properly enforce a requirement for mutual authentication. A client can simply omit the certificate_verify message from the handshake, and never present a certificate. | ||
| CVE-2022-25638 | Med | 0.00 | 6.5 | 0.01 | Feb 24, 2022 | In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, certificate validation may be bypassed during attempted authentication by a TLS 1.3 client to a TLS 1.3 server. This occurs when the sig_algo field differs between the certificate_verify message and the certificate message. | ||
| CVE-2022-23408 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.1 | 0.01 | Jan 18, 2022 | wolfSSL 5.x before 5.1.1 uses non-random IV values in certain situations. This affects connections (without AEAD) using AES-CBC or DES3 with TLS 1.1 or 1.2 or DTLS 1.1 or 1.2. This occurs because of misplaced memory initialization in BuildMessage in internal.c. | ||
| CVE-2021-45939 | Med | 0.00 | 5.5 | 0.01 | Jan 1, 2022 | wolfSSL wolfMQTT 1.9 has a heap-based buffer overflow in MqttClient_DecodePacket (called from MqttClient_WaitType and MqttClient_Subscribe). | ||
| CVE-2021-45938 | Med | 0.00 | 5.5 | 0.01 | Jan 1, 2022 | wolfSSL wolfMQTT 1.9 has a heap-based buffer overflow in MqttClient_DecodePacket (called from MqttClient_WaitType and MqttClient_Unsubscribe). | ||
| CVE-2021-45937 | Med | 0.00 | 5.5 | 0.01 | Jan 1, 2022 | wolfSSL wolfMQTT 1.9 has a heap-based buffer overflow in MqttClient_DecodePacket (called from MqttClient_WaitType and MqttClient_Connect). | ||
| CVE-2021-45936 | Med | 0.00 | 5.5 | 0.01 | Jan 1, 2022 | wolfSSL wolfMQTT 1.9 has a heap-based buffer overflow in MqttDecode_Disconnect (called from MqttClient_DecodePacket and MqttClient_WaitType). | ||
| CVE-2021-45934 | Med | 0.00 | 5.5 | 0.01 | Jan 1, 2022 | wolfSSL wolfMQTT 1.9 has a heap-based buffer overflow in MqttClient_DecodePacket (called from MqttClient_HandlePacket and MqttClient_WaitType). | ||
| CVE-2021-45933 | Med | 0.00 | 5.5 | 0.01 | Jan 1, 2022 | wolfSSL wolfMQTT 1.9 has a heap-based buffer overflow (8 bytes) in MqttDecode_Publish (called from MqttClient_DecodePacket and MqttClient_HandlePacket). | ||
| CVE-2021-45932 | Med | 0.00 | 5.5 | 0.01 | Jan 1, 2022 | wolfSSL wolfMQTT 1.9 has a heap-based buffer overflow (4 bytes) in MqttDecode_Publish (called from MqttClient_DecodePacket and MqttClient_HandlePacket). | ||
| CVE-2021-38597 | Med | 0.00 | 5.9 | 0.00 | Aug 12, 2021 | wolfSSL before 4.8.1 incorrectly skips OCSP verification in certain situations of irrelevant response data that contains the NoCheck extension. |
- risk 0.27cvss 5.3epss 0.00
Certificates with wildcard DNS SANs (e.g. *.example.com) bypassed CA name-constraint checks. A certificate with a wildcard DNS SAN that should be rejected by the issuing CA's permitted/excluded DNS name constraints could be accepted.
- risk 0.27cvss 5.3epss 0.00
A padding oracle exists in wolfSSL's PKCS7 CBC decryption that could allow an attacker to recover plaintext through repeated decryption queries with modified ciphertext. In previous versions of wolfSSL the interior padding bytes are not validated.
- risk 0.27cvss 5.3epss 0.00
A 1-byte stack buffer over-read was identified in the MatchDomainName function (src/internal.c) during wildcard hostname validation when the LEFT_MOST_WILDCARD_ONLY flag is active. If a wildcard * exhausts the entire hostname string, the function reads one byte past the buffer…
- risk 0.27cvss 5.2epss 0.00
Protection mechanism failure in wolfCrypt post-quantum implementations (ML-KEM and ML-DSA) in wolfSSL on ARM Cortex-M microcontrollers allows a physical attacker to compromise key material and/or cryptographic outcomes via induced transient faults that corrupt or redirect…
- risk 0.27cvss 5.3epss 0.00
Integer underflow in wolfSSL packet sniffer <= 5.8.4 allows an attacker to cause a buffer overflow in the AEAD decryption path by injecting a TLS record shorter than the explicit IV plus authentication tag into traffic inspected by ssl_DecodePacket. The underflow wraps a 16-bit…
- risk 0.27cvss 4.1epss 0.00
The side-channel protected T-Table implementation in wolfSSL up to version 5.6.5 protects against a side-channel attacker with cache-line resolution. In a controlled environment such as Intel SGX, an attacker can gain a per instruction sub-cache-line resolution allowing them to…
- risk 0.24cvss 4.7epss 0.00
In wolfSSL 5.8.4, constant-time masking logic in sp_256_get_entry_256_9 is optimized into conditional branches (bnez) by GCC when targeting RISC-V RV32I with -O3. This transformation breaks the side-channel resistance of ECC scalar multiplication, potentially allowing a local…
- risk 0.21cvss 4.3epss 0.00
Certificate policy and RFC 8446 compliance concerns regarding the continued acceptance of SHA-1/MD5 in certificate processing.
- risk 0.21cvss 4.3epss 0.00
Potential read out of bounds case with wolfSSHd on Windows while handling a terminal resize request. An authenticated user could trigger the out of bounds read after establishing a connection which would leak the adjacent stack memory to the pseudo-console output.
- risk 0.21cvss 4.3epss 0.00
X.509 date buffer overflow in wolfSSL_X509_notAfter / wolfSSL_X509_notBefore. A buffer overflow may occur when parsing date fields from a crafted X.509 certificate via the compatibility layer API. This is only triggered when calling these two APIs directly from an application,…
- risk 0.19cvss 4.0epss 0.00
When restoring a session from cache, a pointer from the serialized session data is used in a free operation without validation. An attacker who can poison the session cache could trigger an arbitrary free. Exploitation requires the ability to inject a crafted session into the…
- risk 0.14cvss 3.3epss 0.00
1-byte OOB heap read in wc_PKCS7_DecodeEnvelopedData via zero-length encrypted content. A vulnerability existed in wolfSSL 5.8.4 and earlier, where a 1-byte out-of-bounds heap read in wc_PKCS7_DecodeEnvelopedData could be triggered by a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with…
- risk 0.11cvss 2.7epss 0.00
Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required…
- CVE-2009-4484Dec 30, 2009risk 0.09cvss —epss 0.70
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the CertDecoder::GetName function in src/asn.cpp in TaoCrypt in yaSSL before 1.9.9, as used in mysqld in MySQL 5.0.x before 5.0.90, MySQL 5.1.x before 5.1.43, MySQL 5.5.x through 5.5.0-m2, and other products, allow remote attackers to…
- risk 0.07cvss —epss 0.00
Exporting a TPM based RSA key larger than 2048 bits from the TPM could overrun a stack buffer if the default `MAX_RSA_KEY_BITS=2048` is used. If your TPM 2.0 module supports RSA key sizes larger than 2048 bit and your applications supports creating or importing an RSA private or…
- risk 0.00cvss 8.1epss 0.00
A heap buffer over-read vulnerability exists in the wolfSSH_CleanPath() function in wolfSSH. An authenticated remote attacker can trigger the issue via crafted SCP path input containing '/./' sequences, resulting in a heap over read by 1 byte.
- risk 0.00cvss 9.8epss 0.00
wolfSSH’s key exchange state machine can be manipulated to leak the client’s password in the clear, trick the client to send a bogus signature, or trick the client into skipping user authentication. This affects client applications with wolfSSH version 1.4.21 and earlier.…
- risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.00
Multiple constant-time implementations in wolfSSL before version 5.8.4 may be transformed into non-constant-time binary by LLVM optimizations, which can potentially result in observable timing discrepancies and lead to information disclosure through timing side-channel attacks.
- risk 0.00cvss 5.4epss 0.00
With TLS 1.2 connections a client can use any digest, specifically a weaker digest that is supported, rather than those in the CertificateRequest.
- risk 0.00cvss 7.5epss 0.00
Vulnerability in X25519 constant-time cryptographic implementations due to timing side channels introduced by compiler optimizations and CPU architecture limitations, specifically with the Xtensa-based ESP32 chips. If targeting Xtensa it is recommended to use the low memory…
- risk 0.00cvss 5.3epss 0.00
Improper input validation in the TLS 1.3 KeyShareEntry parsing in wolfSSL v5.8.2 on multiple platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial-of-service by sending a crafted ClientHello message containing duplicate KeyShareEntry values for the same supported…
- risk 0.00cvss 2.7epss 0.00
Improper input validation in the TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify signature algorithm negotiation in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows for downgrading the signature algorithm used. For example when a client sends ECDSA P521 as the supported signature algorithm the…
- risk 0.00cvss 6.5epss 0.00
Improper Input Validation in the TLS 1.3 CKS extension parsing in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to potentially cause a denial-of-service via a crafted ClientHello message with duplicate CKS extensions.
- risk 0.00cvss 4.3epss 0.00
The server previously verified the TLS 1.3 PSK binder using a non-constant time method which could potentially leak information about the PSK binder
- risk 0.00cvss 8.2epss 0.00
Integer Underflow Leads to Out-of-Bounds Access in XChaCha20-Poly1305 Decrypt. This issue is hit specifically with a call to the function wc_XChaCha20Poly1305_Decrypt() which is not used with TLS connections, only from direct calls from an application.
- risk 0.00cvss 7.5epss 0.00
With TLS 1.3 pre-shared key (PSK) a malicious or faulty server could ignore the request for PFS (perfect forward secrecy) and the client would continue on with the connection using PSK without PFS. This happened when a server responded to a ClientHello containing psk_dhe_ke…
- risk 0.00cvss 9.8epss 0.00
Improper host authentication vulnerability in wolfSSH version 1.4.20 and earlier clients that allows authentication bypass and leaking of clients credentials.
- risk 0.00cvss 9.8epss 0.00
Potential stack buffer overwrite on the SFTP server side when receiving a malicious packet that has a handle size larger than the system handle or file descriptor size, but smaller than max handle size allowed.
- risk 0.00cvss 5.9epss 0.01
Fault Injection vulnerability in RsaPrivateDecryption function in wolfssl/wolfcrypt/src/rsa.c in WolfSSL wolfssl5.6.6 on Linux/Windows allows remote attacker co-resides in the same system with a victim process to disclose information and escalate privileges via Rowhammer fault…
- risk 0.00cvss 7.5epss 0.01
In function MatchDomainName(), input param str is treated as a NULL terminated string despite being user provided and unchecked. Specifically, the function X509_check_host() takes in a pointer and length to check against, with no requirements that it be NULL terminated. If a…
- risk 0.00cvss 4.1epss 0.00
Generating the ECDSA nonce k samples a random number r and then truncates this randomness with a modular reduction mod n where n is the order of the elliptic curve. Meaning k = r mod n. The division used during the reduction estimates a factor q_e by dividing the upper two …
- risk 0.00cvss 7.5epss 0.01
Remotely executed SEGV and out of bounds read allows malicious packet sender to crash or cause an out of bounds read via sending a malformed packet with the correct length.
- risk 0.00cvss 9.1epss 0.01
A vulnerability was found in wolfSSH's server-side state machine before versions 1.4.17. A malicious client could create channels without first performing user authentication, resulting in unauthorized access.
- risk 0.00cvss 5.3epss 0.01
In wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6, if callback functions are enabled (via the WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS flag), then a malicious TLS client or network attacker can trigger a buffer over-read on the heap of 5 bytes (WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS is only intended for debugging).
- risk 0.00cvss 5.3epss 0.01
wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one (D)TLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine (D)TLS messages using different keys into one (D)TLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in (D)TLS 1.3, it was possible that an…
- risk 0.00cvss 9.1epss 0.01
If a TLS 1.3 client gets neither a PSK (pre shared key) extension nor a KSE (key share extension) when connecting to a malicious server, a default predictable buffer gets used for the IKM (Input Keying Material) value when generating the session master secret. Using a…
- risk 0.00cvss 5.9epss 0.02
An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.5.0 (when --enable-session-ticket is used); however, only version 5.3.0 is exploitable. Man-in-the-middle attackers or a malicious server can crash TLS 1.2 clients during a handshake. If an attacker injects a large ticket (more than…
- risk 0.00cvss 7.5epss 0.02
An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.5.0. When a TLS 1.3 client connects to a wolfSSL server and SSL_clear is called on its session, the server crashes with a segmentation fault. This occurs in the second session, which is created through TLS session resumption and reuses…
- risk 0.00cvss 9.8epss 0.02
WolfSSH v1.4.7 was discovered to contain an integer overflow via the function wolfSSH_SFTP_RecvRMDIR.
- risk 0.00cvss 7.5epss 0.01
In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, a TLS 1.3 server cannot properly enforce a requirement for mutual authentication. A client can simply omit the certificate_verify message from the handshake, and never present a certificate.
- risk 0.00cvss 6.5epss 0.01
In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, certificate validation may be bypassed during attempted authentication by a TLS 1.3 client to a TLS 1.3 server. This occurs when the sig_algo field differs between the certificate_verify message and the certificate message.
- risk 0.00cvss 9.1epss 0.01
wolfSSL 5.x before 5.1.1 uses non-random IV values in certain situations. This affects connections (without AEAD) using AES-CBC or DES3 with TLS 1.1 or 1.2 or DTLS 1.1 or 1.2. This occurs because of misplaced memory initialization in BuildMessage in internal.c.
- risk 0.00cvss 5.5epss 0.01
wolfSSL wolfMQTT 1.9 has a heap-based buffer overflow in MqttClient_DecodePacket (called from MqttClient_WaitType and MqttClient_Subscribe).
- risk 0.00cvss 5.5epss 0.01
wolfSSL wolfMQTT 1.9 has a heap-based buffer overflow in MqttClient_DecodePacket (called from MqttClient_WaitType and MqttClient_Unsubscribe).
- risk 0.00cvss 5.5epss 0.01
wolfSSL wolfMQTT 1.9 has a heap-based buffer overflow in MqttClient_DecodePacket (called from MqttClient_WaitType and MqttClient_Connect).
- risk 0.00cvss 5.5epss 0.01
wolfSSL wolfMQTT 1.9 has a heap-based buffer overflow in MqttDecode_Disconnect (called from MqttClient_DecodePacket and MqttClient_WaitType).
- risk 0.00cvss 5.5epss 0.01
wolfSSL wolfMQTT 1.9 has a heap-based buffer overflow in MqttClient_DecodePacket (called from MqttClient_HandlePacket and MqttClient_WaitType).
- risk 0.00cvss 5.5epss 0.01
wolfSSL wolfMQTT 1.9 has a heap-based buffer overflow (8 bytes) in MqttDecode_Publish (called from MqttClient_DecodePacket and MqttClient_HandlePacket).
- risk 0.00cvss 5.5epss 0.01
wolfSSL wolfMQTT 1.9 has a heap-based buffer overflow (4 bytes) in MqttDecode_Publish (called from MqttClient_DecodePacket and MqttClient_HandlePacket).
- risk 0.00cvss 5.9epss 0.00
wolfSSL before 4.8.1 incorrectly skips OCSP verification in certain situations of irrelevant response data that contains the NoCheck extension.
Page 3 of 4