Vendor CVEs
Octopus
All CVEs
105 total · sorted by risk| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-9194 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.00 | Sep 30, 2024 | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Linux and Microsoft Windows Octopus Server on Windows, Linux allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Octopus Server: from 2024.1.0 before 2024.1.13038, from 2024.2.0 before… | ||
| CVE-2022-2572 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.01 | Nov 1, 2022 | In affected versions of Octopus Server where access is managed by an external authentication provider, it was possible that the API key/keys of a disabled/deleted user were still valid after the access was revoked. | ||
| CVE-2022-2778 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.01 | Sep 30, 2022 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to bypass rate limiting on login using null bytes. | ||
| CVE-2021-31819 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.02 | Sep 22, 2021 | In Halibut versions prior to 4.4.7 there is a deserialisation vulnerability that could allow remote code execution on systems that already trust each other based on certificate verification. | ||
| CVE-2018-11320 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.01 | May 21, 2018 | In Octopus Deploy 2018.4.4 through 2018.5.1, Octopus variables that are sourced from the target do not have sensitive values obfuscated in the deployment logs. | ||
| CVE-2018-18850 | Hig | 0.61 | 8.8 | 0.12 | Oct 31, 2018 | In Octopus Deploy 2018.8.0 through 2018.9.x before 2018.9.1, an authenticated user with permission to modify deployment processes could upload a maliciously crafted YAML configuration, potentially allowing for remote execution of arbitrary code, running in the same context as… | ||
| CVE-2026-0704 | Cri | 0.59 | 9.1 | 0.00 | Feb 25, 2026 | In affected version of Octopus Deploy it was possible to remove files and/or contents of files on the host using an API endpoint. The field lacked validation which could potentially result in ways to circumvent expected workflows. | ||
| CVE-2022-2782 | Cri | 0.59 | 9.1 | 0.01 | Oct 27, 2022 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for a session token to be valid indefinitely due to improper validation of the session token parameters. | ||
| CVE-2025-0539 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | 0.00 | Apr 10, 2025 | In affected Microsoft Windows versions of Octopus Deploy, the server can be coerced into sending server-side requests that contain authentication material allowing a suitably positioned attacker to compromise the account running Octopus Server and potentially the host… | ||
| CVE-2024-2975 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | 0.00 | Apr 9, 2024 | A race condition was identified through which privilege escalation was possible in certain configurations. | ||
| CVE-2022-4009 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | 0.01 | Mar 16, 2023 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to introduce code via offline package creation | ||
| CVE-2020-10678 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | 0.01 | Mar 19, 2020 | In Octopus Deploy before 2020.1.5, for customers running on-premises Active Directory linked to their Octopus server, an authenticated user can leverage a bug to escalate privileges. | ||
| CVE-2018-5706 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | 0.01 | Jan 16, 2018 | An issue was discovered in Octopus Deploy before 4.1.9. Any user with user editing permissions can modify teams to give themselves Administer System permissions even if they didn't have them, as demonstrated by use of the RoleEdit or TeamEdit permission. | ||
| CVE-2018-4862 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | 0.01 | Jan 3, 2018 | In Octopus Deploy versions 3.2.11 - 4.1.5 (fixed in 4.1.6), an authenticated user with ProcessEdit permission could reference an Azure account in such a way as to bypass the scoping restrictions, resulting in a potential escalation of privileges. | ||
| CVE-2017-17665 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | 0.01 | Dec 13, 2017 | In Octopus Deploy before 4.1.3, the machine update process doesn't check that the user has access to all environments. This allows an access-control bypass because the set of environments to which a machine is scoped may include environments in which the user lacks access. | ||
| CVE-2022-2780 | Hig | 0.53 | 8.1 | 0.01 | Oct 14, 2022 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to use the Git Connectivity test function on the VCS project to initiate an SMB request resulting in the potential for an NTLM relay attack. | ||
| CVE-2019-11632 | Hig | 0.53 | 8.1 | 0.01 | May 1, 2019 | In Octopus Deploy 2019.1.0 through 2019.3.1 and 2019.4.0 through 2019.4.5, an authenticated user with the VariableViewUnscoped or VariableEditUnscoped permission scoped to a specific project could view or edit unscoped variables from a different project. (These permissions are… | ||
| CVE-2021-31822 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Nov 24, 2021 | When Octopus Tentacle is installed on a Linux operating system, the systemd service file permissions are misconfigured. This could lead to a local unprivileged user modifying the contents of the systemd service file to gain privileged access. | ||
| CVE-2021-26557 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Oct 7, 2021 | When Octopus Tentacle is installed using a custom folder location, folder ACLs are not set correctly and could lead to an unprivileged user using DLL side-loading to gain privileged access. | ||
| CVE-2021-26556 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Oct 7, 2021 | When Octopus Server is installed using a custom folder location, folder ACLs are not set correctly and could lead to an unprivileged user using DLL side-loading to gain privileged access. | ||
| CVE-2025-0525 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.00 | Feb 11, 2025 | In affected versions of Octopus Server the preview import feature could be leveraged to identify the existence of a target file. This could provide an adversary with information that may aid in further attacks against the server. | ||
| CVE-2022-2883 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Feb 22, 2023 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to upload a zipbomb file as a task which results in Denial of Service | ||
| CVE-2022-3460 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Jan 3, 2023 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for certain types of sensitive variables to inadvertently become unmasked when viewed in variable preview. | ||
| CVE-2022-2721 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Nov 25, 2022 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for target discovery to print certain values marked as sensitive to log files in plaint-text in when verbose logging is enabled. | ||
| CVE-2022-2075 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Aug 19, 2022 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service targeting the build information request validation. | ||
| CVE-2022-2074 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Aug 19, 2022 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service using the Variable Project Template. | ||
| CVE-2022-2049 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Aug 19, 2022 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service via the package upload function. | ||
| CVE-2022-2013 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Jun 13, 2022 | In Octopus Server after version 2022.1.1495 and before 2022.1.2647 if private spaces were enabled via the experimental feature flag all new users would have access to the Script Console within their private space. | ||
| CVE-2022-1670 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | May 19, 2022 | When generating a user invitation code in Octopus Server, the validity of this code can be set for a specific number of users. It was possible to bypass this restriction of validity to create extra user accounts above the initial number of invited users. | ||
| CVE-2021-31820 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Aug 18, 2021 | In Octopus Server after version 2018.8.2 if the Octopus Server Web Request Proxy is configured with authentication, the password is shown in plaintext in the UI. | ||
| CVE-2021-31817 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Jul 8, 2021 | When configuring Octopus Server if it is configured with an external SQL database, on initial configuration the database password is written to the OctopusServer.txt log file in plaintext. | ||
| CVE-2021-31816 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Jul 8, 2021 | When configuring Octopus Server if it is configured with an external SQL database, on initial configuration the database password is written to the OctopusServer.txt log file in plaintext. | ||
| CVE-2021-30183 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | May 14, 2021 | Cleartext storage of sensitive information in multiple versions of Octopus Server where in certain situations when running import or export processes, the password used to encrypt and decrypt sensitive values would be written to the logs in plaintext. | ||
| CVE-2020-27155 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Oct 22, 2020 | An issue was discovered in Octopus Deploy through 2020.4.4. If enabled, the websocket endpoint may allow an untrusted tentacle host to present itself as a trusted one. | ||
| CVE-2020-25825 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.02 | Oct 12, 2020 | In Octopus Deploy 3.1.0 to 2020.4.0, certain scripts can reveal sensitive information to the user in the task logs. | ||
| CVE-2020-24566 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.02 | Sep 9, 2020 | In Octopus Deploy 2020.3.x before 2020.3.4 and 2020.4.x before 2020.4.1, if an authenticated user creates a deployment or runbook process using Azure steps and sets the step's execution location to run on the server/worker, then (under certain circumstances) the account password… | ||
| CVE-2018-12089 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Jun 11, 2018 | In Octopus Deploy version 2018.5.1 to 2018.5.7, a user with Task View is able to view a password for a Service Fabric Cluster, when the Service Fabric Cluster target is configured in Azure Active Directory security mode and a deployment is executed with OctopusPrintVariables set… | ||
| CVE-2018-10550 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Apr 30, 2018 | In Octopus Deploy before 2018.4.7, target and tenant tag variable scopes were not checked against the list of tenants the user has access to. | ||
| CVE-2017-15609 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Oct 19, 2017 | Octopus before 3.17.7 allows attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information by reading a variable JSON file in certain situations involving Offline Drop Targets. | ||
| CVE-2026-4881 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.00 | Jun 4, 2026 | In affected versions of Octopus Server, permissions were not checked correctly resulting in any authenticated user being able to make server level changes using a certain API endpoint despite receiving an error. | ||
| CVE-2024-12226 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.00 | Jan 16, 2025 | In affected versions of the Octopus Kubernetes worker or agent, sensitive variables could be written to the Kubernetes script pod log in clear-text. This was identified in Version 2 however it was determined that this could also be achieved in Version 1 and the fix was applied… | ||
| CVE-2024-6972 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.00 | Jul 25, 2024 | In affected versions of Octopus Server under certain circumstances it is possible for sensitive variables to be printed in the task log in clear-text. | ||
| CVE-2022-2828 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.01 | Oct 13, 2022 | In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to reveal information about teams via the API due to an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability | ||
| CVE-2022-2528 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.00 | Sep 9, 2022 | In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to upload a package to built-in feed with insufficient permissions after re-indexing packages. | ||
| CVE-2020-14470 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.01 | Jun 19, 2020 | In Octopus Deploy 2018.8.0 through 2019.x before 2019.12.2, an authenticated user with could trigger a deployment that leaks the Helm Chart repository password. | ||
| CVE-2019-19376 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.01 | Nov 28, 2019 | In Octopus Deploy before 2019.10.6, an authenticated user with TeamEdit permission could send a malformed Team API request that bypasses input validation and causes an application level denial of service condition. (The fix for this was also backported to LTS 2019.9.8 and LTS… | ||
| CVE-2019-15508 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.01 | Aug 23, 2019 | In Octopus Tentacle versions 3.0.8 to 5.0.0, when a web request proxy is configured, an authenticated user (in certain limited OctopusPrintVariables circumstances) could trigger a deployment that writes the web request proxy password to the deployment log in cleartext. This is… | ||
| CVE-2019-15507 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.01 | Aug 23, 2019 | In Octopus Deploy versions 2018.8.4 to 2019.7.6, when a web request proxy is configured, an authenticated user (in certain limited special-characters circumstances) could trigger a deployment that writes the web request proxy password to the deployment log in cleartext. This is… | ||
| CVE-2019-14268 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.01 | Jul 25, 2019 | In Octopus Deploy versions 3.0.19 to 2019.7.2, when a web request proxy is configured, an authenticated user (in certain limited circumstances) could trigger a deployment that writes the web request proxy password to the deployment log in cleartext. This is fixed in 2019.7.3.… | ||
| CVE-2019-8944 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.02 | Feb 20, 2019 | An Information Exposure issue in the Terraform deployment step in Octopus Deploy before 2019.1.8 (and before 2018.10.4 LTS) allows remote authenticated users to view sensitive Terraform output variables via log files. |
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.00
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Linux and Microsoft Windows Octopus Server on Windows, Linux allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Octopus Server: from 2024.1.0 before 2024.1.13038, from 2024.2.0 before…
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.01
In affected versions of Octopus Server where access is managed by an external authentication provider, it was possible that the API key/keys of a disabled/deleted user were still valid after the access was revoked.
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.01
In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to bypass rate limiting on login using null bytes.
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.02
In Halibut versions prior to 4.4.7 there is a deserialisation vulnerability that could allow remote code execution on systems that already trust each other based on certificate verification.
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.01
In Octopus Deploy 2018.4.4 through 2018.5.1, Octopus variables that are sourced from the target do not have sensitive values obfuscated in the deployment logs.
- risk 0.61cvss 8.8epss 0.12
In Octopus Deploy 2018.8.0 through 2018.9.x before 2018.9.1, an authenticated user with permission to modify deployment processes could upload a maliciously crafted YAML configuration, potentially allowing for remote execution of arbitrary code, running in the same context as…
- risk 0.59cvss 9.1epss 0.00
In affected version of Octopus Deploy it was possible to remove files and/or contents of files on the host using an API endpoint. The field lacked validation which could potentially result in ways to circumvent expected workflows.
- risk 0.59cvss 9.1epss 0.01
In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for a session token to be valid indefinitely due to improper validation of the session token parameters.
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss 0.00
In affected Microsoft Windows versions of Octopus Deploy, the server can be coerced into sending server-side requests that contain authentication material allowing a suitably positioned attacker to compromise the account running Octopus Server and potentially the host…
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss 0.00
A race condition was identified through which privilege escalation was possible in certain configurations.
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss 0.01
In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to introduce code via offline package creation
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss 0.01
In Octopus Deploy before 2020.1.5, for customers running on-premises Active Directory linked to their Octopus server, an authenticated user can leverage a bug to escalate privileges.
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss 0.01
An issue was discovered in Octopus Deploy before 4.1.9. Any user with user editing permissions can modify teams to give themselves Administer System permissions even if they didn't have them, as demonstrated by use of the RoleEdit or TeamEdit permission.
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss 0.01
In Octopus Deploy versions 3.2.11 - 4.1.5 (fixed in 4.1.6), an authenticated user with ProcessEdit permission could reference an Azure account in such a way as to bypass the scoping restrictions, resulting in a potential escalation of privileges.
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss 0.01
In Octopus Deploy before 4.1.3, the machine update process doesn't check that the user has access to all environments. This allows an access-control bypass because the set of environments to which a machine is scoped may include environments in which the user lacks access.
- risk 0.53cvss 8.1epss 0.01
In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to use the Git Connectivity test function on the VCS project to initiate an SMB request resulting in the potential for an NTLM relay attack.
- risk 0.53cvss 8.1epss 0.01
In Octopus Deploy 2019.1.0 through 2019.3.1 and 2019.4.0 through 2019.4.5, an authenticated user with the VariableViewUnscoped or VariableEditUnscoped permission scoped to a specific project could view or edit unscoped variables from a different project. (These permissions are…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
When Octopus Tentacle is installed on a Linux operating system, the systemd service file permissions are misconfigured. This could lead to a local unprivileged user modifying the contents of the systemd service file to gain privileged access.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
When Octopus Tentacle is installed using a custom folder location, folder ACLs are not set correctly and could lead to an unprivileged user using DLL side-loading to gain privileged access.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
When Octopus Server is installed using a custom folder location, folder ACLs are not set correctly and could lead to an unprivileged user using DLL side-loading to gain privileged access.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.00
In affected versions of Octopus Server the preview import feature could be leveraged to identify the existence of a target file. This could provide an adversary with information that may aid in further attacks against the server.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to upload a zipbomb file as a task which results in Denial of Service
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for certain types of sensitive variables to inadvertently become unmasked when viewed in variable preview.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for target discovery to print certain values marked as sensitive to log files in plaint-text in when verbose logging is enabled.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service targeting the build information request validation.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service using the Variable Project Template.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to perform a Regex Denial of Service via the package upload function.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
In Octopus Server after version 2022.1.1495 and before 2022.1.2647 if private spaces were enabled via the experimental feature flag all new users would have access to the Script Console within their private space.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
When generating a user invitation code in Octopus Server, the validity of this code can be set for a specific number of users. It was possible to bypass this restriction of validity to create extra user accounts above the initial number of invited users.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
In Octopus Server after version 2018.8.2 if the Octopus Server Web Request Proxy is configured with authentication, the password is shown in plaintext in the UI.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
When configuring Octopus Server if it is configured with an external SQL database, on initial configuration the database password is written to the OctopusServer.txt log file in plaintext.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
When configuring Octopus Server if it is configured with an external SQL database, on initial configuration the database password is written to the OctopusServer.txt log file in plaintext.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
Cleartext storage of sensitive information in multiple versions of Octopus Server where in certain situations when running import or export processes, the password used to encrypt and decrypt sensitive values would be written to the logs in plaintext.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
An issue was discovered in Octopus Deploy through 2020.4.4. If enabled, the websocket endpoint may allow an untrusted tentacle host to present itself as a trusted one.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.02
In Octopus Deploy 3.1.0 to 2020.4.0, certain scripts can reveal sensitive information to the user in the task logs.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.02
In Octopus Deploy 2020.3.x before 2020.3.4 and 2020.4.x before 2020.4.1, if an authenticated user creates a deployment or runbook process using Azure steps and sets the step's execution location to run on the server/worker, then (under certain circumstances) the account password…
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
In Octopus Deploy version 2018.5.1 to 2018.5.7, a user with Task View is able to view a password for a Service Fabric Cluster, when the Service Fabric Cluster target is configured in Azure Active Directory security mode and a deployment is executed with OctopusPrintVariables set…
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
In Octopus Deploy before 2018.4.7, target and tenant tag variable scopes were not checked against the list of tenants the user has access to.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
Octopus before 3.17.7 allows attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information by reading a variable JSON file in certain situations involving Offline Drop Targets.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.00
In affected versions of Octopus Server, permissions were not checked correctly resulting in any authenticated user being able to make server level changes using a certain API endpoint despite receiving an error.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.00
In affected versions of the Octopus Kubernetes worker or agent, sensitive variables could be written to the Kubernetes script pod log in clear-text. This was identified in Version 2 however it was determined that this could also be achieved in Version 1 and the fix was applied…
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.00
In affected versions of Octopus Server under certain circumstances it is possible for sensitive variables to be printed in the task log in clear-text.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.01
In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to reveal information about teams via the API due to an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.00
In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to upload a package to built-in feed with insufficient permissions after re-indexing packages.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.01
In Octopus Deploy 2018.8.0 through 2019.x before 2019.12.2, an authenticated user with could trigger a deployment that leaks the Helm Chart repository password.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.01
In Octopus Deploy before 2019.10.6, an authenticated user with TeamEdit permission could send a malformed Team API request that bypasses input validation and causes an application level denial of service condition. (The fix for this was also backported to LTS 2019.9.8 and LTS…
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.01
In Octopus Tentacle versions 3.0.8 to 5.0.0, when a web request proxy is configured, an authenticated user (in certain limited OctopusPrintVariables circumstances) could trigger a deployment that writes the web request proxy password to the deployment log in cleartext. This is…
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.01
In Octopus Deploy versions 2018.8.4 to 2019.7.6, when a web request proxy is configured, an authenticated user (in certain limited special-characters circumstances) could trigger a deployment that writes the web request proxy password to the deployment log in cleartext. This is…
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.01
In Octopus Deploy versions 3.0.19 to 2019.7.2, when a web request proxy is configured, an authenticated user (in certain limited circumstances) could trigger a deployment that writes the web request proxy password to the deployment log in cleartext. This is fixed in 2019.7.3.…
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.02
An Information Exposure issue in the Terraform deployment step in Octopus Deploy before 2019.1.8 (and before 2018.10.4 LTS) allows remote authenticated users to view sensitive Terraform output variables via log files.
Page 1 of 3