Vendor CVEs
Langflow AI
All CVEs
118 total · sorted by risk| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-7755 | Hig | 0.00 | 8.8 | 0.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow remote code execution due to incomplete validation enforcement on MCP server configuration files. | ||
| CVE-2026-7754 | Hig | 0.00 | 7.7 | 0.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow 1.9.0 could allow server-side request forgery (SSRF) due to insecure default configuration and incomplete enforcement of the SSRF protection mechanism. | ||
| CVE-2026-7667 | Hig | 0.00 | 8.8 | 0.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows an authenticated attacker to create a malicious flow pointing to an attacker-controlled URL that returns a specially crafted Content-Disposition header (e.g., filename="../../../target/path" ), enabling arbitrary file write operations… | ||
| CVE-2026-14499 | Hig | 0.00 | 8.8 | 0.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 Langflow could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input in the Python Interpreter component. | ||
| CVE-2026-13448 | Hig | 0.00 | 8.1 | 0.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 Lanflow OSS contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the public flow build endpoint ( /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow ). The vulnerability stems from an incomplete denylist in the… | ||
| CVE-2026-9135 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.9 | 0.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in the Policies component's ToolGuard integration that bypasses the allow_custom_components=false security control. The… | ||
| CVE-2026-9103 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.8 | 0.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access due to improper authentication in the /api/v1/login/auto_login endpoint. The endpoint issues long-lived superuser bearer tokens without requiring authentication when the AUTO_LOGIN… | ||
| CVE-2026-9202 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.8 | 0.00 | Jul 17, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to create unlimited user accounts on any Langflow instance; when NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true (documented deployment option), newly created accounts are immediately active and can authenticate to reach RCE… | ||
| CVE-2026-7874 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.1 | 0.00 | Jun 30, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow disclosure of all stored credentials due to the use of a weak and reversible key derivation mechanism for encryption at rest. | ||
| CVE-2026-7873 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.9 | 0.00 | Jun 30, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands and read sensitive files including credentials, enabling complete system compromise and lateral movement. | ||
| CVE-2026-7871 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.8 | 0.00 | Jun 30, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows users with Redis access to execute arbitrary code with full application privileges, compromising all secrets, data, and system integrity. | ||
| CVE-2026-7803 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.8 | 0.00 | Jun 30, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow arbitrary code execution due to improper validation of flow nodes with missing or empty component type fields. | ||
| CVE-2026-7663 | Cri | 0.00 | 9.1 | 0.00 | Jun 30, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 could allow unauthenticated attackers to access protected MCP project resources and execute MCP operations due to improper authorization enforcement in the Streamable MCP transport endpoint. | ||
| CVE-2026-10564 | Hig | 0.00 | 8.2 | 0.00 | Jun 30, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The legacy RSSReaderComponent in rss.py and SearXNG component in searxng.py make unvalidated HTTP requests to user-controlled URLs, bypassing SSRF protections introduced in version 1.9.3. An… | ||
| CVE-2026-10560 | Hig | 0.00 | 8.2 | 0.00 | Jun 30, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 contains a missing authentication vulnerability in /api/v1/build_public_tmp/ endpoints that allows an unauthenticated attacker to read build event data or cancel jobs using a valid job identifier, resulting in information disclosure and… | ||
| CVE-2026-10546 | Hig | 0.00 | 7.1 | 0.00 | Jun 30, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the URL component ( src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data_source/url.py ) due to a Time-of-Check/Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition that can be exploited via DNS rebinding. | ||
| CVE-2026-10134 | Cri | 0.00 | 10.0 | 0.00 | Jun 30, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows an attacker to read every secret available to the Langflow process, read and modify every flow, conversation, message, file upload, and saved component in the Langflow database, can connect to internal services, abuse cloud metadata… | ||
| CVE-2026-10129 | Hig | 0.00 | 8.5 | 0.00 | Jun 30, 2026 | IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass vulnerability in the API Request component. An authenticated attacker with low-level privileges (flow author role) can bypass SSRF protections by enabling the follow_redirects… |
- risk 0.00cvss 8.8epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow remote code execution due to incomplete validation enforcement on MCP server configuration files.
- risk 0.00cvss 7.7epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow 1.9.0 could allow server-side request forgery (SSRF) due to insecure default configuration and incomplete enforcement of the SSRF protection mechanism.
- risk 0.00cvss 8.8epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows an authenticated attacker to create a malicious flow pointing to an attacker-controlled URL that returns a specially crafted Content-Disposition header (e.g., filename="../../../target/path" ), enabling arbitrary file write operations…
- risk 0.00cvss 8.8epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 Langflow could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input in the Python Interpreter component.
- risk 0.00cvss 8.1epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 Lanflow OSS contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the public flow build endpoint ( /api/v1/build_public_tmp/{flow_id}/flow ). The vulnerability stems from an incomplete denylist in the…
- risk 0.00cvss 9.9epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in the Policies component's ToolGuard integration that bypasses the allow_custom_components=false security control. The…
- risk 0.00cvss 9.8epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access due to improper authentication in the /api/v1/login/auto_login endpoint. The endpoint issues long-lived superuser bearer tokens without requiring authentication when the AUTO_LOGIN…
- risk 0.00cvss 9.8epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows unauthenticated attackers to create unlimited user accounts on any Langflow instance; when NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true (documented deployment option), newly created accounts are immediately active and can authenticate to reach RCE…
- risk 0.00cvss 9.1epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow disclosure of all stored credentials due to the use of a weak and reversible key derivation mechanism for encryption at rest.
- risk 0.00cvss 9.9epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands and read sensitive files including credentials, enabling complete system compromise and lateral movement.
- risk 0.00cvss 9.8epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 allows users with Redis access to execute arbitrary code with full application privileges, compromising all secrets, data, and system integrity.
- risk 0.00cvss 9.8epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow arbitrary code execution due to improper validation of flow nodes with missing or empty component type fields.
- risk 0.00cvss 9.1epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 could allow unauthenticated attackers to access protected MCP project resources and execute MCP operations due to improper authorization enforcement in the Streamable MCP transport endpoint.
- risk 0.00cvss 8.2epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). The legacy RSSReaderComponent in rss.py and SearXNG component in searxng.py make unvalidated HTTP requests to user-controlled URLs, bypassing SSRF protections introduced in version 1.9.3. An…
- risk 0.00cvss 8.2epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 contains a missing authentication vulnerability in /api/v1/build_public_tmp/ endpoints that allows an unauthenticated attacker to read build event data or cancel jobs using a valid job identifier, resulting in information disclosure and…
- risk 0.00cvss 7.1epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the URL component ( src/lfx/src/lfx/components/data_source/url.py ) due to a Time-of-Check/Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition that can be exploited via DNS rebinding.
- risk 0.00cvss 10.0epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows an attacker to read every secret available to the Langflow process, read and modify every flow, conversation, message, file upload, and saved component in the Langflow database, can connect to internal services, abuse cloud metadata…
- risk 0.00cvss 8.5epss 0.00
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection bypass vulnerability in the API Request component. An authenticated attacker with low-level privileges (flow author role) can bypass SSRF protections by enabling the follow_redirects…
Page 3 of 3