Indutny
Products
3Recent CVEs
11| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-48949 | Cri | 0.52 | 9.1 | 0.01 | Oct 10, 2024 | The verify function in lib/elliptic/eddsa/index.js in the Elliptic package before 6.5.6 for Node.js omits "sig.S().gte(sig.eddsa.curve.n) || sig.S().isNeg()" validation. | ||
| CVE-2024-29415 | Hig | 0.46 | 8.1 | 0.08 | May 27, 2024 | The ip package through 2.0.1 for Node.js might allow SSRF because some IP addresses (such as 127.1, 01200034567, 012.1.2.3, 000:0:0000::01, and ::fFFf:127.0.0.1) are improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix… | ||
| CVE-2020-13822 | Hig | 0.43 | 7.7 | 0.03 | Jun 4, 2020 | The Elliptic package 6.5.2 for Node.js allows ECDSA signature malleability via variations in encoding, leading '\0' bytes, or integer overflows. This could conceivably have a security-relevant impact if an application relied on a single canonical signature. | ||
| CVE-2020-28498 | Med | 0.37 | 6.8 | 0.01 | Feb 2, 2021 | The package elliptic before 6.5.4 are vulnerable to Cryptographic Issues via the secp256k1 implementation in elliptic/ec/key.js. There is no check to confirm that the public key point passed into the derive function actually exists on the secp256k1 curve. This results in the… | ||
| CVE-2025-14505 | Med | 0.36 | 5.6 | 0.00 | Jan 8, 2026 | The ECDSA implementation of the Elliptic package generates incorrect signatures if an interim value of 'k' (as computed based on step 3.2 of RFC 6979 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6979 ) has leading zeros and is susceptible to cryptanalysis, which can lead to secret… | ||
| CVE-2026-2739 | Med | 0.27 | 5.3 | 0.00 | Feb 20, 2026 | This affects versions of the package bn.js before 5.2.3. Calling maskn(0) on any BN instance corrupts the internal state, causing toString(), divmod(), and other methods to enter an infinite loop, hanging the process indefinitely. | ||
| CVE-2024-42460 | Med | 0.27 | 5.3 | 0.00 | Aug 2, 2024 | In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, ECDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing check for whether the leading bit of r and s is zero. | ||
| CVE-2024-42459 | Med | 0.27 | 5.3 | 0.00 | Aug 2, 2024 | In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, EDDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing signature length check, and thus zero-valued bytes can be removed or appended. | ||
| CVE-2024-48948 | Med | 0.24 | 4.8 | 0.01 | Oct 15, 2024 | The Elliptic package 6.5.7 for Node.js, in its for ECDSA implementation, does not correctly verify valid signatures if the hash contains at least four leading 0 bytes and when the order of the elliptic curve's base point is smaller than the hash, because of an _truncateToN… | ||
| CVE-2025-59437 | Low | 0.21 | 3.2 | 0.00 | Sep 16, 2025 | The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value 0 is improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-29415. NOTE: in current versions of several… | ||
| CVE-2025-59436 | Low | 0.21 | 3.2 | 0.00 | Sep 16, 2025 | The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value 017700000001 is improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-29415. |
- risk 0.52cvss 9.1epss 0.01
The verify function in lib/elliptic/eddsa/index.js in the Elliptic package before 6.5.6 for Node.js omits "sig.S().gte(sig.eddsa.curve.n) || sig.S().isNeg()" validation.
- risk 0.46cvss 8.1epss 0.08
The ip package through 2.0.1 for Node.js might allow SSRF because some IP addresses (such as 127.1, 01200034567, 012.1.2.3, 000:0:0000::01, and ::fFFf:127.0.0.1) are improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix…
- risk 0.43cvss 7.7epss 0.03
The Elliptic package 6.5.2 for Node.js allows ECDSA signature malleability via variations in encoding, leading '\0' bytes, or integer overflows. This could conceivably have a security-relevant impact if an application relied on a single canonical signature.
- risk 0.37cvss 6.8epss 0.01
The package elliptic before 6.5.4 are vulnerable to Cryptographic Issues via the secp256k1 implementation in elliptic/ec/key.js. There is no check to confirm that the public key point passed into the derive function actually exists on the secp256k1 curve. This results in the…
- risk 0.36cvss 5.6epss 0.00
The ECDSA implementation of the Elliptic package generates incorrect signatures if an interim value of 'k' (as computed based on step 3.2 of RFC 6979 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6979 ) has leading zeros and is susceptible to cryptanalysis, which can lead to secret…
- risk 0.27cvss 5.3epss 0.00
This affects versions of the package bn.js before 5.2.3. Calling maskn(0) on any BN instance corrupts the internal state, causing toString(), divmod(), and other methods to enter an infinite loop, hanging the process indefinitely.
- risk 0.27cvss 5.3epss 0.00
In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, ECDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing check for whether the leading bit of r and s is zero.
- risk 0.27cvss 5.3epss 0.00
In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, EDDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing signature length check, and thus zero-valued bytes can be removed or appended.
- risk 0.24cvss 4.8epss 0.01
The Elliptic package 6.5.7 for Node.js, in its for ECDSA implementation, does not correctly verify valid signatures if the hash contains at least four leading 0 bytes and when the order of the elliptic curve's base point is smaller than the hash, because of an _truncateToN…
- risk 0.21cvss 3.2epss 0.00
The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value 0 is improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-29415. NOTE: in current versions of several…
- risk 0.21cvss 3.2epss 0.00
The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value 017700000001 is improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-29415.