Godaddy
Products
3- 4 CVEs
- 2 CVEs
- 1 CVE
Recent CVEs
7| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-10903 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | 0.01 | Aug 21, 2019 | The GoDaddy godaddy-email-marketing-sign-up-forms plugin before 1.1.3 for WordPress has CSRF. | ||
| CVE-2024-4260 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.01 | Jul 23, 2024 | The Page Builder Gutenberg Blocks WordPress plugin before 3.1.12 does not prevent users from pinging arbitrary hosts via some of its shortcodes, which could allow high privilege users such as contributors to perform SSRF attacks. | ||
| CVE-2024-1049 | Med | 0.42 | 6.4 | 0.00 | Mar 23, 2024 | The Page Builder Gutenberg Blocks – CoBlocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's Icon Widget's in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.6 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on the link value. This makes it… | ||
| CVE-2024-2369 | Med | 0.35 | 5.4 | 0.00 | Apr 2, 2024 | The Page Builder Gutenberg Blocks WordPress plugin before 3.1.7 does not validate and escape some of its block options before outputting them back in a page/post where the block is embed, which could allow users with the contributor role and above to perform Stored Cross-Site… | ||
| CVE-2024-7132 | Med | 0.31 | 4.8 | 0.00 | Aug 29, 2024 | The Page Builder Gutenberg Blocks WordPress plugin before 3.1.13 does not escape the content of post embed via one of its block, which could allow users with the capability to publish posts (editor and admin by default) to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when… | ||
| CVE-2023-49156 | Med | 0.28 | 4.3 | 0.00 | Dec 9, 2024 | Missing Authorization vulnerability in GoDaddy GoDaddy Email Marketing godaddy-email-marketing-sign-up-forms allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects GoDaddy Email Marketing: from n/a through <= 1.4.3. | ||
| CVE-2021-26276 | Med | 0.28 | 5.3 | 0.01 | Jan 27, 2021 | scripts/cli.js in the GoDaddy node-config-shield (aka Config Shield) package before 0.2.2 for Node.js calls eval when processing a set command. NOTE: the vendor reportedly states that this is not a vulnerability. The set command was not intended for use with untrusted data |
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss 0.01
The GoDaddy godaddy-email-marketing-sign-up-forms plugin before 1.1.3 for WordPress has CSRF.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.01
The Page Builder Gutenberg Blocks WordPress plugin before 3.1.12 does not prevent users from pinging arbitrary hosts via some of its shortcodes, which could allow high privilege users such as contributors to perform SSRF attacks.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.4epss 0.00
The Page Builder Gutenberg Blocks – CoBlocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's Icon Widget's in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.6 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on the link value. This makes it…
- risk 0.35cvss 5.4epss 0.00
The Page Builder Gutenberg Blocks WordPress plugin before 3.1.7 does not validate and escape some of its block options before outputting them back in a page/post where the block is embed, which could allow users with the contributor role and above to perform Stored Cross-Site…
- risk 0.31cvss 4.8epss 0.00
The Page Builder Gutenberg Blocks WordPress plugin before 3.1.13 does not escape the content of post embed via one of its block, which could allow users with the capability to publish posts (editor and admin by default) to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when…
- risk 0.28cvss 4.3epss 0.00
Missing Authorization vulnerability in GoDaddy GoDaddy Email Marketing godaddy-email-marketing-sign-up-forms allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects GoDaddy Email Marketing: from n/a through <= 1.4.3.
- risk 0.28cvss 5.3epss 0.01
scripts/cli.js in the GoDaddy node-config-shield (aka Config Shield) package before 0.2.2 for Node.js calls eval when processing a set command. NOTE: the vendor reportedly states that this is not a vulnerability. The set command was not intended for use with untrusted data