Vendor
allauth
Products
1
CVEs
2
Across products
2
Status
Private
Products
1- 2 CVEs
Recent CVEs
2| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-65430 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | Dec 15, 2025 | An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. IdP: marking a user as is_active=False after having handed tokens for that user while the account was still active had no effect. Fixed the access/refresh tokens are now rejected. | |||
| CVE-2025-65431 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | Dec 15, 2025 | An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferred_username as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead. |
- CVE-2025-65430Dec 15, 2025risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.00
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. IdP: marking a user as is_active=False after having handed tokens for that user while the account was still active had no effect. Fixed the access/refresh tokens are now rejected.
- CVE-2025-65431Dec 15, 2025risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.00
An issue was discovered in allauth-django before 65.13.0. Both Okta and NetIQ were using preferred_username as the identifier for third-party provider accounts. That value may be mutable and should therefore be avoided for authorization decisions. The providers are now using sub instead.