Server And Application Monitor
by SolarWinds
CVEs (3)
| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-1501 | 0.01 | — | 0.07 | Feb 16, 2015 | The factory.loadExtensionFactory function in TSUnicodeGraphEditorControl in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor (SAM) allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a UNC path to a crafted binary. | |||
| CVE-2015-1500 | 0.01 | — | 0.08 | Feb 16, 2015 | Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the TSUnicodeGraphEditorControl in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor (SAM) allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors to (1) graphManager.load or (2) factory.load. | |||
| CVE-2022-47508 | 0.00 | — | 0.01 | Feb 15, 2023 | Customers who had configured their polling to occur via Kerberos did not expect NTLM Traffic on their environment, but since we were querying for data via IP address this prevented us from utilizing Kerberos. |
- CVE-2015-1501Feb 16, 2015risk 0.01cvss —epss 0.07
The factory.loadExtensionFactory function in TSUnicodeGraphEditorControl in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor (SAM) allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a UNC path to a crafted binary.
- CVE-2015-1500Feb 16, 2015risk 0.01cvss —epss 0.08
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the TSUnicodeGraphEditorControl in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor (SAM) allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors to (1) graphManager.load or (2) factory.load.
- CVE-2022-47508Feb 15, 2023risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.01
Customers who had configured their polling to occur via Kerberos did not expect NTLM Traffic on their environment, but since we were querying for data via IP address this prevented us from utilizing Kerberos.