Security Guardium
by IBM
CVEs (137)
| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-1271 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Dec 7, 2017 | IBM Security Guardium 9.0, 9.1, and 9.5 supports interaction between multiple actors and allows those actors to negotiate which algorithm should be used as a protection mechanism such as encryption or authentication, but it does not select the strongest algorithm that is… | ||
| CVE-2017-1267 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.02 | Jul 21, 2017 | IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.1 processes patches, image backups and other updates without sufficiently verifying the origin and integrity of the code. IBM X-Force ID: 124742. | ||
| CVE-2017-1264 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.02 | Jul 5, 2017 | IBM Security Guardium 10.0 does not prove or insufficiently proves that the actors identity is correct which can lead to exposure of resources or functionality to unintended actors. IBM X-Force ID: 124739. | ||
| CVE-2020-4184 | Hig | 0.48 | 7.3 | 0.01 | Mar 15, 2021 | IBM Security Guardium 11.2 performs an operation at a privilege level that is higher than the minimum level required, which creates new weaknesses or amplifies the consequences of other weaknesses. IBM X-Force ID: 174802.. | ||
| CVE-2017-1122 | Hig | 0.48 | 7.4 | 0.00 | Apr 20, 2017 | IBM Security Guardium 8.2, 9.0, and 10.0 contains a vulnerability that could allow a local attacker with CLI access to inject arbitrary commands which would be executed as root. IBM X-Force ID: 121174. | ||
| CVE-2022-43907 | Hig | 0.47 | 7.2 | 0.01 | Aug 27, 2023 | IBM Security Guardium 11.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system by sending a specially crafted request. IBM X-Force ID: 240901. | ||
| CVE-2021-20557 | Hig | 0.47 | 7.2 | 0.03 | May 24, 2021 | IBM Security Guardium 11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system by sending a specially crafted request. IBM X-Force ID: 199184. | ||
| CVE-2021-20385 | Hig | 0.47 | 7.2 | 0.02 | May 24, 2021 | IBM Security Guardium 11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 195766. | ||
| CVE-2020-4603 | Hig | 0.47 | 7.2 | 0.01 | Aug 27, 2020 | IBM Security Guardium Insights 2.0.1 performs an operation at a privilege level that is higher than the minimum level required, which creates new weaknesses or amplifies the consequences of other weaknesses. IBM X-Force ID: 184880. | ||
| CVE-2017-1254 | Hig | 0.46 | 7.1 | 0.02 | Jul 5, 2017 | IBM Security Guardium 10.0 is vulnerable to a XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose highly sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 124634. | ||
| CVE-2025-3473 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Jun 11, 2025 | IBM Security Guardium 12.1 could allow a local privileged user to escalate their privileges to root due to insecure inherited permissions created by the program. | ||
| CVE-2020-4689 | Med | 0.44 | 6.8 | 0.02 | Oct 12, 2020 | IBM Security Guardium 11.2 is vulnerable to CVS Injection. A remote privileged attacker could execute arbitrary commands on the system, caused by improper validation of csv file contents. IBM X-ForceID: 186696. | ||
| CVE-2020-4190 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Jun 3, 2020 | IBM Security Guardium 10.6, 11.0, and 11.1 contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. IBM X-Force ID: 174851. | ||
| CVE-2024-49336 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.00 | Dec 19, 2024 | IBM Security Guardium 11.5 and 12.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||
| CVE-2021-20433 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.01 | Sep 15, 2021 | IBM Security Guardium 11.3 could allow a an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information that could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 196345. | ||
| CVE-2020-4167 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.01 | Aug 27, 2020 | IBM Security Guardium Insights 2.0.1 could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information or perform unauthorized actions due to improper authenciation mechanisms. IBM X-Force ID: 174403. | ||
| CVE-2020-4307 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.01 | Jun 3, 2020 | IBM Security Guardium 11.1 could allow an attacker on the same network to gain access to the Solr dashboard and cause a denial of service attack. IBM X-Force ID: 176997. | ||
| CVE-2017-1258 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.01 | Jul 5, 2017 | IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.1 does not perform an authentication check for a critical resource or functionality allowing anonymous users access to protected areas. IBM X-Force ID: 124685 | ||
| CVE-2016-0298 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.01 | Jun 29, 2016 | Directory traversal vulnerability in IBM Security Guardium Database Activity Monitor 10 before 10.0p100 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via a crafted URL. | ||
| CVE-2023-0041 | Med | 0.41 | 6.3 | 0.00 | Jun 5, 2023 | IBM Security Guardium 11.5 could allow a user to take over another user's session due to insufficient session expiration. IBM X-Force ID: 243657. |
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
IBM Security Guardium 9.0, 9.1, and 9.5 supports interaction between multiple actors and allows those actors to negotiate which algorithm should be used as a protection mechanism such as encryption or authentication, but it does not select the strongest algorithm that is…
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.02
IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.1 processes patches, image backups and other updates without sufficiently verifying the origin and integrity of the code. IBM X-Force ID: 124742.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.02
IBM Security Guardium 10.0 does not prove or insufficiently proves that the actors identity is correct which can lead to exposure of resources or functionality to unintended actors. IBM X-Force ID: 124739.
- risk 0.48cvss 7.3epss 0.01
IBM Security Guardium 11.2 performs an operation at a privilege level that is higher than the minimum level required, which creates new weaknesses or amplifies the consequences of other weaknesses. IBM X-Force ID: 174802..
- risk 0.48cvss 7.4epss 0.00
IBM Security Guardium 8.2, 9.0, and 10.0 contains a vulnerability that could allow a local attacker with CLI access to inject arbitrary commands which would be executed as root. IBM X-Force ID: 121174.
- risk 0.47cvss 7.2epss 0.01
IBM Security Guardium 11.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system by sending a specially crafted request. IBM X-Force ID: 240901.
- risk 0.47cvss 7.2epss 0.03
IBM Security Guardium 11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system by sending a specially crafted request. IBM X-Force ID: 199184.
- risk 0.47cvss 7.2epss 0.02
IBM Security Guardium 11.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the system. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 195766.
- risk 0.47cvss 7.2epss 0.01
IBM Security Guardium Insights 2.0.1 performs an operation at a privilege level that is higher than the minimum level required, which creates new weaknesses or amplifies the consequences of other weaknesses. IBM X-Force ID: 184880.
- risk 0.46cvss 7.1epss 0.02
IBM Security Guardium 10.0 is vulnerable to a XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose highly sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: 124634.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
IBM Security Guardium 12.1 could allow a local privileged user to escalate their privileges to root due to insecure inherited permissions created by the program.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.8epss 0.02
IBM Security Guardium 11.2 is vulnerable to CVS Injection. A remote privileged attacker could execute arbitrary commands on the system, caused by improper validation of csv file contents. IBM X-ForceID: 186696.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
IBM Security Guardium 10.6, 11.0, and 11.1 contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. IBM X-Force ID: 174851.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.00
IBM Security Guardium 11.5 and 12.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.01
IBM Security Guardium 11.3 could allow a an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information that could be used in further attacks against the system. IBM X-Force ID: 196345.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.01
IBM Security Guardium Insights 2.0.1 could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information or perform unauthorized actions due to improper authenciation mechanisms. IBM X-Force ID: 174403.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.01
IBM Security Guardium 11.1 could allow an attacker on the same network to gain access to the Solr dashboard and cause a denial of service attack. IBM X-Force ID: 176997.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.01
IBM Security Guardium 10.0 and 10.1 does not perform an authentication check for a critical resource or functionality allowing anonymous users access to protected areas. IBM X-Force ID: 124685
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.01
Directory traversal vulnerability in IBM Security Guardium Database Activity Monitor 10 before 10.0p100 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via a crafted URL.
- risk 0.41cvss 6.3epss 0.00
IBM Security Guardium 11.5 could allow a user to take over another user's session due to insufficient session expiration. IBM X-Force ID: 243657.
Page 3 of 7