Operations
by Microfocus
CVEs (11)
| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-3756 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.00 | Apr 13, 2026 | A vulnerability exists in the command handling of the IEC 61850 communication stack included in the product revisions listed as affected in this CVE. An attacker with access to IEC 61850 networks could exploit the vulnera bility by using a specially crafted 61850 packet, forcing… | ||
| CVE-2020-24675 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | Dec 22, 2020 | In S+ Operations and S+ History, it is possible that an unauthenticated user could inject values to the Operations History server (or standalone S+ History server) and ultimately write values to the controlled process. | |||
| CVE-2020-24673 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | Dec 22, 2020 | In S+ Operations and S+ Historian, a successful SQL injection exploit can read sensitive data from the database, modify database data (Insert/Update/Delete), execute administration operations on the database (such as shutdown the DBMS), recover the content of a given file… | |||
| CVE-2020-24674 | 0.00 | — | 0.04 | Dec 22, 2020 | In S+ Operations and S+ Historian, not all client commands correctly check user permission as expected. Authenticated but Unauthorized remote users could execute a Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack, execute arbitrary code, or obtain more privilege than intended on the machines. | |||
| CVE-2020-24683 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | Dec 22, 2020 | The affected versions of S+ Operations (version 2.1 SP1 and earlier) used an approach for user authentication which relies on validation at the client node (client-side authentication). This is not as secure as having the server validate a client application before allowing a… | |||
| CVE-2020-24680 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | Dec 22, 2020 | In S+ Operations and S+ Historian, the passwords of internal users (not Windows Users) are encrypted but improperly stored in a database. | |||
| CVE-2020-24679 | 0.00 | — | 0.01 | Dec 22, 2020 | A S+ Operations and S+ Historian service is subject to a DoS by special crafted messages. An attacker might use this flaw to make it crash or even execute arbitrary code on the machine where the service is hosted. | |||
| CVE-2020-24677 | 0.00 | — | 0.01 | Dec 22, 2020 | Vulnerabilities in the S+ Operations and S+ Historian web applications can lead to a possible code execution and privilege escalation, redirect the user somewhere else or download unwanted data. | |||
| CVE-2020-24678 | 0.00 | — | 0.01 | Dec 22, 2020 | An authenticated user might execute malicious code under the user context and take control of the system. S+ Operations or S+ Historian database is affected by multiple vulnerabilities such as the possibility to allow remote authenticated users to gain high privileges. | |||
| CVE-2011-0894 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | Apr 4, 2011 | Unspecified vulnerability in HP Operations 9.10 on UNIX platforms allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions via unknown vectors. | |||
| CVE-2011-0893 | 0.00 | — | 0.01 | Apr 4, 2011 | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in HP Operations 9.10 on UNIX platforms allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. |
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.00
A vulnerability exists in the command handling of the IEC 61850 communication stack included in the product revisions listed as affected in this CVE. An attacker with access to IEC 61850 networks could exploit the vulnera bility by using a specially crafted 61850 packet, forcing…
- CVE-2020-24675Dec 22, 2020risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.00
In S+ Operations and S+ History, it is possible that an unauthenticated user could inject values to the Operations History server (or standalone S+ History server) and ultimately write values to the controlled process.
- CVE-2020-24673Dec 22, 2020risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.00
In S+ Operations and S+ Historian, a successful SQL injection exploit can read sensitive data from the database, modify database data (Insert/Update/Delete), execute administration operations on the database (such as shutdown the DBMS), recover the content of a given file…
- CVE-2020-24674Dec 22, 2020risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.04
In S+ Operations and S+ Historian, not all client commands correctly check user permission as expected. Authenticated but Unauthorized remote users could execute a Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack, execute arbitrary code, or obtain more privilege than intended on the machines.
- CVE-2020-24683Dec 22, 2020risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.00
The affected versions of S+ Operations (version 2.1 SP1 and earlier) used an approach for user authentication which relies on validation at the client node (client-side authentication). This is not as secure as having the server validate a client application before allowing a…
- CVE-2020-24680Dec 22, 2020risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.00
In S+ Operations and S+ Historian, the passwords of internal users (not Windows Users) are encrypted but improperly stored in a database.
- CVE-2020-24679Dec 22, 2020risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.01
A S+ Operations and S+ Historian service is subject to a DoS by special crafted messages. An attacker might use this flaw to make it crash or even execute arbitrary code on the machine where the service is hosted.
- CVE-2020-24677Dec 22, 2020risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.01
Vulnerabilities in the S+ Operations and S+ Historian web applications can lead to a possible code execution and privilege escalation, redirect the user somewhere else or download unwanted data.
- CVE-2020-24678Dec 22, 2020risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.01
An authenticated user might execute malicious code under the user context and take control of the system. S+ Operations or S+ Historian database is affected by multiple vulnerabilities such as the possibility to allow remote authenticated users to gain high privileges.
- CVE-2011-0894Apr 4, 2011risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.00
Unspecified vulnerability in HP Operations 9.10 on UNIX platforms allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions via unknown vectors.
- CVE-2011-0893Apr 4, 2011risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.01
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in HP Operations 9.10 on UNIX platforms allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.