VYPR

Aspera Shares

by IBM

CVEs (22)

  • CVE-2020-4436HigJun 10, 2020
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.03

    Certain IBM Aspera applications are vulnerable to buffer overflow after valid authentication, which could allow an attacker with intimate knowledge of the system to execute arbitrary code through a service. IBM X-Force ID: 180902.

  • CVE-2020-4435HigJun 10, 2020
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.02

    Certain IBM Aspera applications are vulnerable to arbitrary memory corruption based on the product configuration, which could allow an attacker with intimate knowledge of the system to execute arbitrary code or perform a denial-of-service (DoS) through the http fallback service.…

  • CVE-2020-4434HigJun 10, 2020
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.03

    Certain IBM Aspera applications are vulnerable to buffer overflow based on the product configuration and valid authentication, which could allow an attacker with intimate knowledge of the system to execute arbitrary code or perform a denial-of-service (DoS) through the http…

  • CVE-2020-4433HigJun 10, 2020
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.05

    Certain IBM Aspera applications are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. This could allow a remote attacker with intimate knowledge of the server to execute arbitrary code on the system with the privileges of root or cause server to…

  • CVE-2020-4432HigJun 10, 2020
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.03

    Certain IBM Aspera applications are vulnerable to command injection after valid authentication, which could allow an attacker with intimate knowledge of the system to execute commands in a SOAP API. IBM X-Force ID: 180810.

  • CVE-2025-0162HigMar 7, 2025
    risk 0.46cvss 7.1epss 0.00

    IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.9 through 1.10.0 PL7 is vulnerable to an XML external entity injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources.

  • CVE-2024-56472MedFeb 5, 2025
    risk 0.42cvss 6.4epss 0.00

    IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.0 through 1.10.0 PL6 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within…

  • CVE-2025-66483MedApr 1, 2026
    risk 0.41cvss 6.3epss 0.00

    IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.9 through 1.11.0 does not invalidate session after a password reset which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system.

  • CVE-2024-38315MedSep 16, 2024
    risk 0.41cvss 6.3epss 0.00

    IBM Aspera Shares 1.0 through 1.10.0 PL3 does not invalidate session after a password reset which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system.

  • CVE-2023-38018MedAug 12, 2024
    risk 0.41cvss 6.3epss 0.00

    IBM Aspera Shares 1.10.0 PL2 does not invalidate session after a password change which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 260574.

  • CVE-2020-4731MedSep 21, 2020
    risk 0.40cvss 6.1epss 0.01

    IBM Aspera Web Application 1.9.14 PL1 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM…

  • CVE-2025-13916MedApr 1, 2026
    risk 0.38cvss 5.9epss 0.00

    IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.9 through 1.11.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information

  • CVE-2025-66484MedApr 1, 2026
    risk 0.36cvss 5.5epss 0.00

    IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.9 through 1.11.0 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.

  • CVE-2025-66485MedApr 1, 2026
    risk 0.35cvss 5.4epss 0.00

    IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.9 through 1.11.0 is vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation of input by the HOST headers.  This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cross-site scripting, cache poisoning or…

  • CVE-2024-56471MedFeb 5, 2025
    risk 0.35cvss 5.4epss 0.00

    IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.0 through 1.10.0 PL6 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.

  • CVE-2024-56470MedFeb 5, 2025
    risk 0.35cvss 5.4epss 0.00

    IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.0 through 1.10.0 PL6 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.

  • CVE-2024-56473MedFeb 5, 2025
    risk 0.34cvss 5.3epss 0.00

    IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.0 through 1.10.0 PL6 could allow an attacker to spoof their IP address, which is written to log files, due to improper verification of 'Client-IP' headers.

  • CVE-2025-66486MedApr 1, 2026
    risk 0.31cvss 4.8epss 0.00

    IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.9 through 1.11.0 is vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site.

  • CVE-2024-38318MedFeb 5, 2025
    risk 0.31cvss 4.8epss 0.00

    IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.0 through 1.10.0 PL6 is vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site.

  • CVE-2024-38317MedFeb 5, 2025
    risk 0.31cvss 4.8epss 0.00

    IBM Aspera Shares 1.9.0 through 1.10.0 PL6 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows a privileged user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a…

Page 1 of 2