Financial Transaction Manager
by IBM
CVEs (94)
| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-18074 | Hig | 0.53 | 8.2 | — | Sep 22, 2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper authentication and missing authorization. | ||
| CVE-2026-18154 | Hig | 0.52 | 8.0 | — | Sep 22, 2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the use of a hard-coded or predictable cryptographic key. | ||
| CVE-2016-0272 | Hig | 0.52 | 8.0 | 0.01 | Mar 9, 2018 | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for ACH Services for Multi-Platform 2.1.1.2 and 3.0.0.x before fp0013, Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for Check Services for Multi-Platform 2.1.1.2 and 3.0.0.x before fp0013, and… | ||
| CVE-2026-18066 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.9 | — | Sep 22, 2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information and trigger unauthorized actions due to server-side request forgery. | ||
| CVE-2026-18134 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | — | Sep 22, 2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information. | ||
| CVE-2026-18123 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.6 | — | Sep 22, 2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to the improper use of reflection with externally controlled input. | ||
| CVE-2023-49880 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Dec 25, 2023 | In the Message Entry and Repair (MER) facility of IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services 3.2.4 the sending address and the message type of FIN messages are assumed to be immutable. However, an attacker might modify these elements of a business transaction. IBM… | ||
| CVE-2026-18176 | Hig | 0.48 | 7.4 | — | Sep 22, 2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information. | ||
| CVE-2026-18172 | Hig | 0.48 | 7.4 | — | Sep 22, 2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper restriction of XML external entity references. | ||
| CVE-2026-18152 | Hig | 0.48 | 7.4 | — | Sep 22, 2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to forge validly-signed messages due to improper verification of cryptographic signatures. | ||
| CVE-2026-17618 | Hig | 0.47 | 7.3 | — | Sep 22, 2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to view and modify sensitive information and cause a denial of service due to improper authorization. | ||
| CVE-2023-35892 | Hig | 0.46 | 7.1 | 0.01 | Sep 5, 2023 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services 3.2.4 is vulnerable to an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: … | ||
| CVE-2017-1758 | Hig | 0.46 | 7.1 | 0.02 | Feb 21, 2018 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager for ACH Services for Multi-Platform (IBM Control Center 6.0 and 6.1, IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.0.2, 3.0.3, 3.0.4, and 3.1.0, IBM Transformation Extender Advanced 9.0) is vulnerable to a XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when… | ||
| CVE-2026-18170 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | — | Sep 22, 2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to allocation of resources without limits or throttling. | ||
| CVE-2026-18156 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | — | Sep 22, 2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security controls by forging user identities due to improper authorization. | ||
| CVE-2026-18132 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | — | Sep 22, 2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized payment mutation actions due to missing authorization. | ||
| CVE-2026-18124 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | — | Sep 22, 2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to insufficiently protected credentials. | ||
| CVE-2026-18114 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | — | Sep 22, 2026 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to read arbitrary files due to improper path canonicalization. | ||
| CVE-2024-49339 | Med | 0.42 | 6.4 | 0.00 | Jan 31, 2025 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services for Multiplatforms 3.2.4.0 through 3.2.4.1 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality… | ||
| CVE-2020-4904 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.00 | Dec 16, 2020 | IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services for Multiplatforms 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. |
- risk 0.53cvss 8.2epss —
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper authentication and missing authorization.
- risk 0.52cvss 8.0epss —
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the use of a hard-coded or predictable cryptographic key.
- risk 0.52cvss 8.0epss 0.01
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for ACH Services for Multi-Platform 2.1.1.2 and 3.0.0.x before fp0013, Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for Check Services for Multi-Platform 2.1.1.2 and 3.0.0.x before fp0013, and…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.9epss —
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information and trigger unauthorized actions due to server-side request forgery.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss —
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.6epss —
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to the improper use of reflection with externally controlled input.
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01
In the Message Entry and Repair (MER) facility of IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services 3.2.4 the sending address and the message type of FIN messages are assumed to be immutable. However, an attacker might modify these elements of a business transaction. IBM…
- risk 0.48cvss 7.4epss —
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
- risk 0.48cvss 7.4epss —
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper restriction of XML external entity references.
- risk 0.48cvss 7.4epss —
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to forge validly-signed messages due to improper verification of cryptographic signatures.
- risk 0.47cvss 7.3epss —
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to view and modify sensitive information and cause a denial of service due to improper authorization.
- risk 0.46cvss 7.1epss 0.01
IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services 3.2.4 is vulnerable to an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to expose sensitive information or consume memory resources. IBM X-Force ID: …
- risk 0.46cvss 7.1epss 0.02
IBM Financial Transaction Manager for ACH Services for Multi-Platform (IBM Control Center 6.0 and 6.1, IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.0.2, 3.0.3, 3.0.4, and 3.1.0, IBM Transformation Extender Advanced 9.0) is vulnerable to a XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when…
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss —
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to allocation of resources without limits or throttling.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss —
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security controls by forging user identities due to improper authorization.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss —
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized payment mutation actions due to missing authorization.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss —
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to insufficiently protected credentials.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss —
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to read arbitrary files due to improper path canonicalization.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.4epss 0.00
IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services for Multiplatforms 3.2.4.0 through 3.2.4.1 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows authenticated users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality…
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.00
IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services for Multiplatforms 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
Page 2 of 5