IBM i
by IBM
CVEs (16)
| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-18221 | Hig | 0.53 | 8.1 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access due to improper validation of client-supplied authentication parameters. | ||
| CVE-2026-17273 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a NULL pointer dereference. | ||
| CVE-2026-17207 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service and compromise integrity due to a buffer overflow. | ||
| CVE-2026-17057 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service and affect data integrity due to missing authentication for critical functions. | ||
| CVE-2026-18341 | Med | 0.41 | 6.3 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to corrupt memory due to an integer underflow. | ||
| CVE-2026-18069 | Med | 0.39 | 6.0 | — | Sep 14, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to obtain ownership of arbitrary file system objects due to a time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition. | ||
| CVE-2026-17274 | Med | 0.35 | 5.4 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to predictable server seeds. | ||
| CVE-2026-16892 | Med | 0.35 | 5.4 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication during service-name matching. | ||
| CVE-2026-16826 | Med | 0.34 | 5.3 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||
| CVE-2026-18073 | Med | 0.29 | 4.4 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local authenticated attacker to inject parameters into a CL command due to improper neutralization of special elements. | ||
| CVE-2026-17499 | Med | 0.29 | 4.4 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||
| CVE-2026-18251 | Med | 0.28 | 4.3 | — | Sep 14, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of the WebSocket origin. | ||
| CVE-2026-18078 | Med | 0.28 | 4.3 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to an integer overflow. | ||
| CVE-2026-18076 | Med | 0.28 | 4.3 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a memory leak. | ||
| CVE-2026-17270 | Med | 0.28 | 4.3 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to cause a denial of service due to a stack-based buffer overflow. | ||
| CVE-2026-18151 | Med | 0.27 | 4.2 | — | Sep 14, 2026 | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a race condition during the WebSocket handshake process. |
- risk 0.53cvss 8.1epss 0.00
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access due to improper validation of client-supplied authentication parameters.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.00
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a NULL pointer dereference.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.00
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service and compromise integrity due to a buffer overflow.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.00
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service and affect data integrity due to missing authentication for critical functions.
- risk 0.41cvss 6.3epss 0.00
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to corrupt memory due to an integer underflow.
- risk 0.39cvss 6.0epss —
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to obtain ownership of arbitrary file system objects due to a time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition.
- risk 0.35cvss 5.4epss 0.00
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to predictable server seeds.
- risk 0.35cvss 5.4epss 0.00
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication during service-name matching.
- risk 0.34cvss 5.3epss 0.00
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
- risk 0.29cvss 4.4epss 0.00
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local authenticated attacker to inject parameters into a CL command due to improper neutralization of special elements.
- risk 0.29cvss 4.4epss 0.00
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
- risk 0.28cvss 4.3epss —
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of the WebSocket origin.
- risk 0.28cvss 4.3epss 0.00
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to an integer overflow.
- risk 0.28cvss 4.3epss 0.00
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a memory leak.
- risk 0.28cvss 4.3epss 0.00
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to cause a denial of service due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
- risk 0.27cvss 4.2epss —
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a race condition during the WebSocket handshake process.