VYPR

Sterling Secure Proxy

by IBM

CVEs (32)

  • CVE-2024-41783CriJan 19, 2025
    risk 0.59cvss 9.1epss 0.01

    IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.0.0, 6.0.0.1, 6.0.0.2, 6.0.0.3, 6.1.0.0, and 6.2.0.0 could allow a privileged user to inject commands into the underlying operating system due to improper validation of a specified type of input.

  • CVE-2024-38337CriJan 19, 2025
    risk 0.59cvss 9.1epss 0.00

    IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.0.0, 6.0.0.1, 6.0.0.2, 6.0.0.3, 6.1.0.0, and 6.2.0.0 could allow an unauthorized attacker to retrieve or alter sensitive information contents due to incorrect permission assignments.

  • CVE-2020-4462HigJul 16, 2020
    risk 0.54cvss 8.2epss 0.03

    IBM Sterling External Authentication Server 6.0.1, 6.0.0, 2.4.3.2, and 2.4.2 and IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.1, 6.0.0, 3.4.3, and 3.4.2 are vulnerable to an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) attack when processing XML data. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability…

  • CVE-2024-41784HigNov 15, 2024
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01

    IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.0.0, 6.0.0.1, 6.0.0.2, 6.0.0.3, and 6.1.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot dot" sequences (/.../) to view arbitrary files on the system.

  • CVE-2022-22336HigFeb 23, 2022
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.02

    IBM Sterling External Authentication Server and IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.3.0, 6.0.2.0, and 3.4.3.2 could allow a remote user to consume resources causing a denial of service due to a resource leak. IBM X-Force ID: 219395.

  • CVE-2021-29723HigAug 30, 2021
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01

    IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.1, 6.0.2, 2.4.3.2, and 3.4.3.2 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-ForceID: 201100.

  • CVE-2021-29722HigAug 30, 2021
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.01

    IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.1, 6.0.2, 2.4.3.2, and 3.4.3.2 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 201095.

  • CVE-2021-29725HigJul 15, 2021
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.03

    IBM Secure External Authentication Server 2.4.3.2, 6.0.1, 6.0.2 and IBM Secure Proxy 3.4.3.2, 6.0.1, 6.0.2 could allow a remote user to consume resources causing a denial of service due to a resource leak.

  • CVE-2016-6023HigOct 6, 2016
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.02

    Directory traversal vulnerability in the Configuration Manager in IBM Sterling Secure Proxy (SSP) 3.4.2 before 3.4.2.0 iFix 8 and 3.4.3 before 3.4.3.0 iFix 1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted URL.

  • CVE-2022-22333MedFeb 23, 2022
    risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.01

    IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.3.0, 6.0.2.0, and 3.4.3.2 and IBM Sterling External Authentication Server are vulnerable a buffer overflow, due to the Jetty based GUI in the Secure Zone not properly validating the sizes of the form content and/or HTTP headers submitted. A local…

  • CVE-2023-47699MedMar 15, 2024
    risk 0.40cvss 6.1epss 0.00

    IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.3 and 6.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM…

  • CVE-2023-47162MedMar 15, 2024
    risk 0.40cvss 6.1epss 0.00

    IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.3 and 6.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM…

  • CVE-2016-6027MedOct 6, 2016
    risk 0.40cvss 6.1epss 0.01

    The Configuration Manager in IBM Sterling Secure Proxy (SSP) 3.4.2 before 3.4.2.0 iFix 8 and 3.4.3 before 3.4.3.0 iFix 1 does not enable the HSTS protection mechanism, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or modify data by leveraging use of…

  • CVE-2024-38341MedMay 28, 2025
    risk 0.38cvss 5.9epss 0.00

    IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.0.0 through 6.0.3.1, 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.0.0, and 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information.

  • CVE-2023-47147MedMar 15, 2024
    risk 0.38cvss 5.9epss 0.00

    IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.3 and 6.1.0 could allow an attacker to overwrite a log message under specific conditions. IBM X-Force ID: 270598.

  • CVE-2022-34361MedDec 6, 2022
    risk 0.38cvss 5.9epss 0.00

    IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.3 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 230522.

  • CVE-2016-6025MedOct 6, 2016
    risk 0.38cvss 5.9epss 0.00

    The Configuration Manager in IBM Sterling Secure Proxy (SSP) 3.4.2 before 3.4.2.0 iFix 8 and 3.4.3 before 3.4.3.0 iFix 1 allows remote attackers to obtain access by leveraging an unattended workstation to conduct a post-logoff session-reuse attack involving a modified URL.

  • CVE-2023-46182MedMar 15, 2024
    risk 0.35cvss 5.4epss 0.00

    IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.3 and 6.1.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM…

  • CVE-2021-29726MedMay 17, 2022
    risk 0.35cvss 5.3epss 0.01

    IBM Sterling Secure Proxy 6.0.3 and IBM Secure External Authentication Server 6.0.3 does not properly ensure that a certificate is actually associated with the host due to improper validation of certificates. IBM X-Force ID: 201104.

  • CVE-2021-29749MedJul 15, 2021
    risk 0.35cvss 5.4epss 0.01

    IBM Secure External Authentication Server 6.0.2 and IBM Secure Proxy 6.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating…

Page 1 of 2