Field Analytics
by SICK AG
CVEs (12)
| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-49199 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | 0.00 | Jun 12, 2025 | The backup ZIPs are not signed by the application, leading to the possibility that an attacker can download a backup ZIP, modify and re-upload it. This allows the attacker to disrupt the application by configuring the services in a way that they are unable to run, … | ||
| CVE-2025-49184 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.00 | Jun 12, 2025 | A remote unauthorized attacker may gather sensitive information of the application, due to missing authorization of configuration settings of the product. | ||
| CVE-2025-49200 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.00 | Jun 12, 2025 | The created backup files are unencrypted, making the application vulnerable for gathering sensitive information by downloading and decompressing the backup files. | ||
| CVE-2025-49196 | Med | 0.42 | 6.5 | 0.00 | Jun 12, 2025 | A service supports the use of a deprecated and unsafe TLS version. This could be exploited to expose sensitive information, modify data in unexpected ways or spoof identities of other users or devices, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of the device. | ||
| CVE-2025-49185 | Med | 0.36 | 5.5 | 0.00 | Jun 12, 2025 | The web application is susceptible to cross-site-scripting attacks. An attacker who can create new dashboard widgets can inject malicious JavaScript code into the Transform Function which will be executed when the widget receives data from its data source. | ||
| CVE-2025-49188 | Med | 0.34 | 5.3 | 0.00 | Jun 12, 2025 | The application sends user credentials as URL parameters instead of POST bodies, making it vulnerable to information gathering. | ||
| CVE-2025-49187 | Med | 0.34 | 5.3 | 0.00 | Jun 12, 2025 | For failed login attempts, the application returns different error messages depending on whether the login failed due to an incorrect password or a non-existing username. This allows an attacker to guess usernames until they find an existing one. | ||
| CVE-2025-49186 | Med | 0.34 | 5.3 | 0.00 | Jun 12, 2025 | The product does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame, making it susceptible to brute-force attacks. | ||
| CVE-2025-49191 | Med | 0.31 | 4.8 | 0.00 | Jun 12, 2025 | Linked URLs during the creation of iFrame widgets and dashboards are vulnerable to code execution. The URLs get embedded as iFrame widgets, making it possible to attack other users that access the dashboard by including malicious code. The attack is only possible if the attacker… | ||
| CVE-2025-49192 | Med | 0.28 | 4.3 | 0.00 | Jun 12, 2025 | The web application is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks. The site can be embedded into another frame, allowing an attacker to trick a user into clicking on something different from what the user perceives. This could potentially reveal confidential information or allow others… | ||
| CVE-2025-49190 | Med | 0.28 | 4.3 | 0.00 | Jun 12, 2025 | The application is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An endpoint can be used to send server internal requests to other ports. | ||
| CVE-2025-49193 | Med | 0.27 | 4.2 | 0.00 | Jun 12, 2025 | The application fails to implement several security headers. These headers help increase the overall security level of the web application by e.g., preventing the application to be displayed in an iFrame (Clickjacking attacks) or not executing injected malicious JavaScript code… |
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss 0.00
The backup ZIPs are not signed by the application, leading to the possibility that an attacker can download a backup ZIP, modify and re-upload it. This allows the attacker to disrupt the application by configuring the services in a way that they are unable to run, …
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.00
A remote unauthorized attacker may gather sensitive information of the application, due to missing authorization of configuration settings of the product.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.00
The created backup files are unencrypted, making the application vulnerable for gathering sensitive information by downloading and decompressing the backup files.
- risk 0.42cvss 6.5epss 0.00
A service supports the use of a deprecated and unsafe TLS version. This could be exploited to expose sensitive information, modify data in unexpected ways or spoof identities of other users or devices, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of the device.
- risk 0.36cvss 5.5epss 0.00
The web application is susceptible to cross-site-scripting attacks. An attacker who can create new dashboard widgets can inject malicious JavaScript code into the Transform Function which will be executed when the widget receives data from its data source.
- risk 0.34cvss 5.3epss 0.00
The application sends user credentials as URL parameters instead of POST bodies, making it vulnerable to information gathering.
- risk 0.34cvss 5.3epss 0.00
For failed login attempts, the application returns different error messages depending on whether the login failed due to an incorrect password or a non-existing username. This allows an attacker to guess usernames until they find an existing one.
- risk 0.34cvss 5.3epss 0.00
The product does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame, making it susceptible to brute-force attacks.
- risk 0.31cvss 4.8epss 0.00
Linked URLs during the creation of iFrame widgets and dashboards are vulnerable to code execution. The URLs get embedded as iFrame widgets, making it possible to attack other users that access the dashboard by including malicious code. The attack is only possible if the attacker…
- risk 0.28cvss 4.3epss 0.00
The web application is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks. The site can be embedded into another frame, allowing an attacker to trick a user into clicking on something different from what the user perceives. This could potentially reveal confidential information or allow others…
- risk 0.28cvss 4.3epss 0.00
The application is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An endpoint can be used to send server internal requests to other ports.
- risk 0.27cvss 4.2epss 0.00
The application fails to implement several security headers. These headers help increase the overall security level of the web application by e.g., preventing the application to be displayed in an iFrame (Clickjacking attacks) or not executing injected malicious JavaScript code…