Unified Contact Center Express
CVEs (6)
| CVE | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-6426 | Hig | 0.49 | 7.5 | 0.00 | Oct 5, 2016 | The j_spring_security_switch_user function in Cisco Unified Intelligence Center (CUIC) 8.5.4 through 9.1(1), as used in Unified Contact Center Express 10.0(1) through 11.0(1), allows remote attackers to create user accounts by visiting an unspecified web page, aka Bug IDs CSCuy75027 and CSCuy81653. | |
| CVE-2017-6722 | Med | 0.40 | 6.1 | 0.00 | Jul 4, 2017 | A vulnerability in the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) service of Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (UCCx) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to masquerade as a legitimate user, aka a Clear Text Authentication Vulnerability. More Information: CSCuw86638. Known Affected Releases: 10.6(1). Known Fixed Releases: 11.5(1.10000.61). | |
| CVE-2016-1298 | Med | 0.40 | 6.1 | 0.00 | Jan 26, 2016 | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express 10.0(1), 10.5(1), 10.6(1), and 11.0(1) allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to permalinks, aka Bug ID CSCux92033. | |
| CVE-2011-2583 | 0.00 | — | 0.01 | May 2, 2012 | Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (aka CCX) 8.0 and 8.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via network traffic, as demonstrated by an SEC-BE-STABLE test case, aka Bug ID CSCth33834. | ||
| CVE-2010-1571 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | Jun 10, 2010 | Directory traversal vulnerability in the bootstrap service in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (UCCX) 7.0 before 7.0(1)SR4 and 7.0(2), unspecified 6.0 versions, and 5.0 before 5.0(2)SR3 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted bootstrap message to TCP port 6295. | ||
| CVE-2010-1570 | 0.00 | — | 0.01 | Jun 10, 2010 | The computer telephony integration (CTI) server component in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (UCCX) 7.0 before 7.0(1)SR4 and 7.0(2), 6.0 before 6.0(1)SR1, and 5.0 before 5.0(2)SR3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CTI server and Node Manager failure) via a malformed CTI message. |
- risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.00
The j_spring_security_switch_user function in Cisco Unified Intelligence Center (CUIC) 8.5.4 through 9.1(1), as used in Unified Contact Center Express 10.0(1) through 11.0(1), allows remote attackers to create user accounts by visiting an unspecified web page, aka Bug IDs CSCuy75027 and CSCuy81653.
- risk 0.40cvss 6.1epss 0.00
A vulnerability in the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) service of Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (UCCx) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to masquerade as a legitimate user, aka a Clear Text Authentication Vulnerability. More Information: CSCuw86638. Known Affected Releases: 10.6(1). Known Fixed Releases: 11.5(1.10000.61).
- risk 0.40cvss 6.1epss 0.00
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express 10.0(1), 10.5(1), 10.6(1), and 11.0(1) allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to permalinks, aka Bug ID CSCux92033.
- CVE-2011-2583May 2, 2012risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.01
Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (aka CCX) 8.0 and 8.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via network traffic, as demonstrated by an SEC-BE-STABLE test case, aka Bug ID CSCth33834.
- CVE-2010-1571Jun 10, 2010risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.00
Directory traversal vulnerability in the bootstrap service in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (UCCX) 7.0 before 7.0(1)SR4 and 7.0(2), unspecified 6.0 versions, and 5.0 before 5.0(2)SR3 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted bootstrap message to TCP port 6295.
- CVE-2010-1570Jun 10, 2010risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.01
The computer telephony integration (CTI) server component in Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (UCCX) 7.0 before 7.0(1)SR4 and 7.0(2), 6.0 before 6.0(1)SR1, and 5.0 before 5.0(2)SR3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CTI server and Node Manager failure) via a malformed CTI message.