Android
by Google
CVEs (8,504)
| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-47013 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Oct 25, 2024 | In pmucal_rae_handle_seq_int of flexpmu_cal_rae.c, there is a possible arbitrary write due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-47012 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Oct 25, 2024 | In mm_GetMobileIdIndexForNsUpdate of mm_GmmPduCodec.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-20092 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Oct 7, 2024 | In vdec, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09028313; Issue ID: MSV-1700. | ||
| CVE-2024-44095 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 13, 2024 | In ppmp_protect_mfcfw_buf of code/drm_fw.c, there is a possible corrupt memory due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-44094 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 13, 2024 | In ppmp_protect_mfcfw_buf of code/drm_fw.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-44093 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 13, 2024 | In ppmp_unprotect_buf of drm/code/drm_fw.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-44092 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 13, 2024 | There is a possible LCS signing enforcement missing due to test/debugging code left in a production build. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-29779 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 13, 2024 | there is a possible escalation of privilege due to an unusual root cause. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-40662 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 11, 2024 | In scheme of Uri.java, there is a possible way to craft a malformed Uri object due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-40658 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 11, 2024 | In getConfig of SoftVideoDecoderOMXComponent.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-40657 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 11, 2024 | In addPreferencesForType of AccountTypePreferenceLoader.java, there is a possible way to disable apps for other users due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for… | ||
| CVE-2024-40655 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 11, 2024 | In bindAndGetCallIdentification of CallScreeningServiceHelper.java, there is a possible way to maintain a while-in-use permission in the background due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User… | ||
| CVE-2024-40654 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 11, 2024 | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-40652 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 11, 2024 | In onCreate of SettingsHomepageActivity.java, there is a possible way to access the Settings app while the device is provisioning due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction… | ||
| CVE-2024-40650 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 11, 2024 | In wifi_item_edit_content of styles.xml , there is a possible FRP bypass due to Missing check for FRP state. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-31336 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 11, 2024 | In PVRSRVBridgeRGXKickTA3D2 of server_rgxta3d_bridge.c, there is a possible arbitrary code execution due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed… | ||
| CVE-2024-32927 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Aug 19, 2024 | In sendDeviceState_1_6 of RadioExt.cpp, there is a possible use after free due to improper locking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-34743 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Aug 15, 2024 | In setTransactionState of SurfaceFlinger.cpp, there is a possible way to perform tapjacking due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-34741 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Aug 15, 2024 | In setForceHideNonSystemOverlayWindowIfNeeded of WindowState.java, there is a possible way for message content to be visible on the screensaver while lock screen visibility settings are restricted by the user due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation… | ||
| CVE-2024-34740 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Aug 15, 2024 | In attributeBytesBase64 and attributeBytesHex of BinaryXmlSerializer.java, there is a possible arbitrary XML injection due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for… |
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In pmucal_rae_handle_seq_int of flexpmu_cal_rae.c, there is a possible arbitrary write due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In mm_GetMobileIdIndexForNsUpdate of mm_GmmPduCodec.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In vdec, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09028313; Issue ID: MSV-1700.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In ppmp_protect_mfcfw_buf of code/drm_fw.c, there is a possible corrupt memory due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In ppmp_protect_mfcfw_buf of code/drm_fw.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In ppmp_unprotect_buf of drm/code/drm_fw.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
There is a possible LCS signing enforcement missing due to test/debugging code left in a production build. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
there is a possible escalation of privilege due to an unusual root cause. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In scheme of Uri.java, there is a possible way to craft a malformed Uri object due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In getConfig of SoftVideoDecoderOMXComponent.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In addPreferencesForType of AccountTypePreferenceLoader.java, there is a possible way to disable apps for other users due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In bindAndGetCallIdentification of CallScreeningServiceHelper.java, there is a possible way to maintain a while-in-use permission in the background due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In onCreate of SettingsHomepageActivity.java, there is a possible way to access the Settings app while the device is provisioning due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In wifi_item_edit_content of styles.xml , there is a possible FRP bypass due to Missing check for FRP state. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In PVRSRVBridgeRGXKickTA3D2 of server_rgxta3d_bridge.c, there is a possible arbitrary code execution due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In sendDeviceState_1_6 of RadioExt.cpp, there is a possible use after free due to improper locking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In setTransactionState of SurfaceFlinger.cpp, there is a possible way to perform tapjacking due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In setForceHideNonSystemOverlayWindowIfNeeded of WindowState.java, there is a possible way for message content to be visible on the screensaver while lock screen visibility settings are restricted by the user due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In attributeBytesBase64 and attributeBytesHex of BinaryXmlSerializer.java, there is a possible arbitrary XML injection due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…
Page 71 of 426