Android
by Google
CVEs (8,563)
| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-36898 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2025 | There is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2025-36887 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2025 | In wl_cfgscan_update_v3_schedscan_results() of wl_cfgscan.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for… | ||
| CVE-2024-56190 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2025 | In wl_update_hidden_ap_ie() of wl_cfgscan.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2025-22438 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 2, 2025 | In afterKeyEventLockedInterruptable of InputDispatcher.cpp, there is a possible use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2025-22437 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 2, 2025 | In setMediaButtonReceiver of multiple files, there is a possible way to launch arbitrary activities from background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed… | ||
| CVE-2025-22434 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 2, 2025 | In handleKeyGestureEvent of PhoneWindowManager.java, there is a possible lock screen bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2025-22433 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 2, 2025 | In canForward of IntentForwarderActivity.java, there is a possible bypass of the cross profile intent filter most commonly used in Work Profile scenarios due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges… | ||
| CVE-2025-22428 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 2, 2025 | In hasInteractAcrossUsersFullPermission of AppInfoBase.java, there is a possible way to grant permissions to an app on the secondary user from the primary user due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution… | ||
| CVE-2025-22422 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 2, 2025 | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to mislead a user into approving an authentication prompt for one app when its result will be used in another due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges… | ||
| CVE-2025-22418 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 2, 2025 | In multiple locations, there is a possible confused deputy due to Intent Redirect. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2025-22416 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 2, 2025 | In onCreate of ChooserActivity.java , there is a possible way to view other users' images due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-49730 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 2, 2025 | In FuseDaemon.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to memory corruption. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2024-49720 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 2, 2025 | In multiple functions of Permissions.java, there is a possible way to override the state of the user's location permissions due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not… | ||
| CVE-2025-20706 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 1, 2025 | In mbrain, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09924624; Issue ID: MSV-3826. | ||
| CVE-2025-20705 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Sep 1, 2025 | In monitor_hang, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09989078; Issue ID:… | ||
| CVE-2025-0080 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Aug 26, 2025 | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to overlay the installation confirmation dialog due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2025-0079 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Aug 26, 2025 | In multiple locations, there is a possible way that avdtp and avctp channels could be unencrypted due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2025-20668 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | May 5, 2025 | In scp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09625562; Issue ID:… | ||
| CVE-2024-56192 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Mar 10, 2025 | In wl_notify_gscan_event of wl_cfgscan.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2025-20645 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Mar 3, 2025 | In KeyInstall, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09475476; Issue… |
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
There is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In wl_cfgscan_update_v3_schedscan_results() of wl_cfgscan.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In wl_update_hidden_ap_ie() of wl_cfgscan.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In afterKeyEventLockedInterruptable of InputDispatcher.cpp, there is a possible use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In setMediaButtonReceiver of multiple files, there is a possible way to launch arbitrary activities from background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In handleKeyGestureEvent of PhoneWindowManager.java, there is a possible lock screen bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In canForward of IntentForwarderActivity.java, there is a possible bypass of the cross profile intent filter most commonly used in Work Profile scenarios due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In hasInteractAcrossUsersFullPermission of AppInfoBase.java, there is a possible way to grant permissions to an app on the secondary user from the primary user due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to mislead a user into approving an authentication prompt for one app when its result will be used in another due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In multiple locations, there is a possible confused deputy due to Intent Redirect. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In onCreate of ChooserActivity.java , there is a possible way to view other users' images due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In FuseDaemon.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to memory corruption. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In multiple functions of Permissions.java, there is a possible way to override the state of the user's location permissions due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In mbrain, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09924624; Issue ID: MSV-3826.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In monitor_hang, there is a possible memory corruption due to use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09989078; Issue ID:…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to overlay the installation confirmation dialog due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In multiple locations, there is a possible way that avdtp and avctp channels could be unencrypted due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In scp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09625562; Issue ID:…
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In wl_notify_gscan_event of wl_cfgscan.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In KeyInstall, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09475476; Issue…
Page 67 of 429