VYPR

Android

by Google

CVEs (8,558)

  • CVE-2025-22405HigAug 26, 2025
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In multiple locations, there is a possible way to execute arbitrary code due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-22404HigAug 26, 2025
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In avct_lcb_msg_ind of avct_lcb_act.cc, there is a possible way to execute arbitrary code due to a use after free. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-27700HigMay 27, 2025
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    There is a possible bypass of carrier restrictions due to an unusual root cause. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-20979HigMay 7, 2025
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    Out-of-bounds write in libsavscmn prior to Android 15 allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code.

  • CVE-2024-56191HigMar 10, 2025
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In dhd_process_full_gscan_result of dhd_pno.c, there is a possible EoP due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2024-40677HigJan 28, 2025
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In shouldSkipForInitialSUW of AdvancedPowerUsageDetail.java, there is a possible way to bypass factory reset protections due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not…

  • CVE-2024-40672HigJan 28, 2025
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In onCreate of ChooserActivity.java, there is a possible way to bypass factory reset protections due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2024-40670HigJan 28, 2025
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In TBD of TBD, there is a possible use after free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2024-40669HigJan 28, 2025
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In TBD of TBD, there is a possible use after free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2024-40651HigJan 28, 2025
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In TBD of TBD, there is a possible use-after-free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2024-40649HigJan 28, 2025
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In TBD of TBD, there is a possible use-after-free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2024-34748HigJan 28, 2025
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In _DevmemXReservationPageAddress of devicemem_server.c, there is a possible use-after-free due to improper casting. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2024-34733HigJan 28, 2025
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In DevmemXIntMapPages of devicemem_server.c, there is a possible arbitrary code execution due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2024-34732HigJan 28, 2025
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In RGXMMUCacheInvalidate of rgxmem.c, there is a possible arbitrary code execution due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2024-20104HigNov 4, 2024
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In da, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS09073261; Issue ID: MSV-1772.

  • CVE-2024-29749HigApr 5, 2024
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In tmu_set_tr_thresholds of tmu.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2024-29746HigApr 5, 2024
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In lpm_req_handler of lpm.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2024-20053HigApr 1, 2024
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In flashc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an uncaught exception. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS08541757; Issue ID: ALPS08541764.

  • CVE-2024-27236HigMar 11, 2024
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In aoc_unlocked_ioctl of aoc.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2024-27226HigMar 11, 2024
    risk 0.55cvss 8.4epss 0.00

    In tmu_config_gov_params of , there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Page 51 of 428