Android
by Google
CVEs (8,640)
| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-56979 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-56973 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In multiple locations, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-56972 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-56932 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In Trusted Execution Environment, there is a possible memory corruption due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-56922 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In CPM, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-56907 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In VPU, there is a possible shared memory overwrite due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-56889 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-56879 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In gmc_mb_msg_handler of gmc_mba.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-55365 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In multiple functions of remap.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-55332 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-55317 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In printf of printf.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-55304 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In addr_remap_address_map of remap.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-55302 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-0192 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In Bootloader, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-0187 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In gsa_sw_pk_hash_compare of image-auth-srv.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-0186 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In ac_init_one_sswrp of init.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-0179 | Med | 0.44 | 6.7 | 0.00 | Sep 15, 2026 | In Bootloader, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-0086 | Med | 0.44 | 6.8 | 0.00 | Jun 1, 2026 | In onCreate of DisableSupervisionActivity.kt, there is a possible way to delete supervision data due to a missing null check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-0048 | Med | 0.44 | 6.8 | 0.00 | Jun 1, 2026 | In hide of WindowState.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into approving permissions due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-0119 | Med | 0.44 | 6.8 | 0.00 | Mar 10, 2026 | In usim_SendMCCMNCIndMsg of usim_Registration.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to memory corruption. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In multiple locations, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In Trusted Execution Environment, there is a possible memory corruption due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In CPM, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In VPU, there is a possible shared memory overwrite due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In gmc_mb_msg_handler of gmc_mba.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In multiple functions of remap.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In multiple locations, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In printf of printf.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In addr_remap_address_map of remap.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In Bootloader, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In gsa_sw_pk_hash_compare of image-auth-srv.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In ac_init_one_sswrp of init.c, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.7epss 0.00
In Bootloader, there is a possible permission bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.8epss 0.00
In onCreate of DisableSupervisionActivity.kt, there is a possible way to delete supervision data due to a missing null check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.8epss 0.00
In hide of WindowState.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into approving permissions due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.44cvss 6.8epss 0.00
In usim_SendMCCMNCIndMsg of usim_Registration.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to memory corruption. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Page 226 of 432