VYPR

Exynos 850

by Samsung Mobile

CVEs (32)

  • CVE-2024-27363MedJul 9, 2024
    risk 0.39cvss 6.0epss 0.00

    A vulnerability was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos 850, Exynos 9610, Exynos 980, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, Exynos 1330, Exynos W920, and Exynos W930 where it does not properly check a pointer address, which can lead to a Information disclosure.

  • CVE-2024-27360MedJul 9, 2024
    risk 0.39cvss 6.0epss 0.00

    A vulnerability was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processors Exynos 850, Exynos 1080, Exynos 2100, Exynos 2200, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, Exynos 1330, and Exynos W930 where they do not properly check length of the data, which can lead to a Denial of Service.

  • CVE-2024-27382MedJun 5, 2024
    risk 0.39cvss 6.0epss 0.00

    An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, and Exynos 1330. In the function slsi_send_action_frame(), there is no input validation check on len coming from userspace, which can lead to a heap over-read.

  • CVE-2024-27381MedJun 5, 2024
    risk 0.39cvss 6.0epss 0.00

    An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, and Exynos 1330. In the function slsi_send_action_frame_ut(), there is no input validation check on len coming from userspace, which can lead to a heap over-read.

  • CVE-2024-27380MedJun 5, 2024
    risk 0.39cvss 6.0epss 0.00

    An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, and Exynos 1330. In the function slsi_set_delayed_wakeup_type(), there is no input validation check on a length of ioctl_args->args[i] coming from userspace, which can lead to a…

  • CVE-2024-27378MedJun 5, 2024
    risk 0.39cvss 6.0epss 0.00

    An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, and Exynos 1330. In the function slsi_send_action_frame_cert(), there is no input validation check on len coming from userspace, which can lead to a heap over-read.

  • CVE-2025-58347MedFeb 3, 2026
    risk 0.36cvss 5.5epss 0.00

    An issue was discovered in the Wi-Fi driver in Samsung Mobile Processor and Wearable Processor Exynos 980, 850, 1080, 1280, 1330, 1380, 1480, 1580, W920, W930 and W1000. There is unbounded memory allocation via a large buffer in a /proc/driver/unifi0/p2p_certif write operation,…

  • CVE-2025-58343MedFeb 3, 2026
    risk 0.36cvss 5.5epss 0.00

    An issue was discovered in the Wi-Fi driver in Samsung Mobile Processor and Wearable Processor Exynos 980, 850, 1080, 1280, 1330, 1380, 1480, 1580, W920, W930 and W1000. There is unbounded memory allocation via a large buffer in a /proc/driver/unifi0/create_tspec write…

  • CVE-2024-27365MedSep 9, 2024
    risk 0.29cvss 4.4epss 0.00

    An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1080, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, Exynos 1330, Exynos 1480, Exynos W920, Exynos W930. In the function slsi_rx_blockack_ind(), there is no input validation check on a length coming from…

  • CVE-2024-27368MedSep 9, 2024
    risk 0.29cvss 4.4epss 0.00

    An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos Mobile Processor, Wearable Processor Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1080, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, Exynos 1330, Exynos 1480, Exynos W920, Exynos W930. In the function slsi_rx_received_frame_ind(), there is no input…

  • CVE-2024-27367MedSep 9, 2024
    risk 0.29cvss 4.4epss 0.00

    An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos Wearable Processor Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1080, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, Exynos 1330, Exynos 1480, Exynos W920, Exynos W930. In the function slsi_rx_scan_ind(), there is no input validation check on a length…

  • CVE-2024-27366MedSep 9, 2024
    risk 0.29cvss 4.4epss 0.00

    An issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor, Wearable Processor Exynos Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1080, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, Exynos 1330, Exynos 1480, Exynos W920, Exynos W930. In the function slsi_rx_scan_done_ind(), there is no input validation check on a…

Page 2 of 2