DevicePolicyManagerService
by Google
CVEs (6)
| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0078 | Hig | 0.51 | 7.8 | 0.00 | Jun 1, 2026 | In setGlobalProxy of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible desync in persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2025-48633 | Med | 0.48 | 5.5 | 0.00 | KEV | Dec 8, 2025 | In hasAccountsOnAnyUser of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible way to add a Device Owner after provisioning due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not… | |
| CVE-2025-22442 | Hig | 0.46 | 7.0 | 0.00 | Sep 2, 2025 | In multiple functions of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible way to install unauthorized applications into a newly created work profile due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User… | ||
| CVE-2025-48554 | Med | 0.40 | 6.1 | 0.00 | Sep 4, 2025 | In handlePackagesChanged of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-28578 | Med | 0.36 | 5.5 | 0.00 | Jun 1, 2026 | In multiple functions of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible desync from persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||
| CVE-2026-0070 | Med | 0.36 | 5.5 | 0.00 | Jun 1, 2026 | In multiple functions of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible way to hide a system critical package due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for… |
- risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00
In setGlobalProxy of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible desync in persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.48cvss 5.5epss 0.00
In hasAccountsOnAnyUser of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible way to add a Device Owner after provisioning due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not…
- risk 0.46cvss 7.0epss 0.00
In multiple functions of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible way to install unauthorized applications into a newly created work profile due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User…
- risk 0.40cvss 6.1epss 0.00
In handlePackagesChanged of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.36cvss 5.5epss 0.00
In multiple functions of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible desync from persistence due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- risk 0.36cvss 5.5epss 0.00
In multiple functions of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible way to hide a system critical package due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…