VYPR

Snort

by Snort

CVEs (24)

  • CVE-2016-1417HigJan 23, 2017
    risk 0.58cvss 8.8epss 0.04

    Untrusted search path vulnerability in Snort 2.9.7.0-WIN32 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attacks via a Trojan horse tcapi.dll that is located in the same folder on a remote file share as a pcap file that is being processed.

  • CVE-2021-1223HigJan 13, 2021
    risk 0.49cvss 7.5epss 0.02

    Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured file policy for HTTP. The vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of an HTTP range header. An attacker could…

  • CVE-2021-40114MedOct 27, 2021
    risk 0.44cvss 6.8epss 0.02

    Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the way the Snort detection engine processes ICMP traffic that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper…

  • CVE-2023-20246MedNov 1, 2023
    risk 0.38cvss 5.8epss 0.01

    Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in Snort access control policies that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the configured policies on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to a logic error that occurs when the access…

  • CVE-2021-1495MedApr 29, 2021
    risk 0.38cvss 5.8epss 0.02

    Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured file policy for HTTP. The vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of specific HTTP header parameters. An attacker…

  • CVE-2021-1224MedJan 13, 2021
    risk 0.38cvss 5.8epss 0.02

    Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability with TCP Fast Open (TFO) when used in conjunction with the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured file policy for HTTP. The vulnerability is due to incorrect…

  • CVE-2020-3299MedOct 21, 2020
    risk 0.38cvss 5.8epss 0.02

    Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured File Policy for HTTP. The vulnerability is due to incorrect detection of modified HTTP packets used in chunked…

  • CVE-2021-1236MedJan 13, 2021
    risk 0.35cvss 5.3epss 0.02

    Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort application detection engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the configured policies on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the detection algorithm. An…

  • CVE-2023-20267MedNov 1, 2023
    risk 0.26cvss 4.0epss 0.00

    A vulnerability in the IP geolocation rules of Snort 3 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to potentially bypass IP address restrictions. This vulnerability exists because the configuration for IP geolocation rules is not parsed properly. An attacker could exploit…

  • CVE-2005-3252Oct 18, 2005
    risk 0.10cvss epss 0.84

    Stack-based buffer overflow in the Back Orifice (BO) preprocessor for Snort before 2.4.3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted UDP packet.

  • CVE-2006-5276Feb 20, 2007
    risk 0.09cvss epss 0.79

    Stack-based buffer overflow in the DCE/RPC preprocessor in Snort before 2.6.1.3, and 2.7 before beta 2; and Sourcefire Intrusion Sensor; allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted SMB traffic.

  • CVE-2009-3641Oct 28, 2009
    risk 0.06cvss epss 0.39

    Snort before 2.8.5.1, when the -v option is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a crafted IPv6 packet that uses the (1) TCP or (2) ICMP protocol.

  • CVE-2003-0209May 5, 2003
    risk 0.06cvss epss 0.39

    Integer overflow in the TCP stream reassembly module (stream4) for Snort 2.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via large sequence numbers in packets, which enable a heap-based buffer overflow.

  • CVE-2006-2769Jun 2, 2006
    risk 0.04cvss epss 0.11

    The HTTP Inspect preprocessor (http_inspect) in Snort 2.4.0 through 2.4.4 allows remote attackers to bypass "uricontent" rules via a carriage return (\r) after the URL and before the HTTP declaration.

  • CVE-2004-2652Dec 31, 2004
    risk 0.04cvss epss 0.11

    The DecodeTCPOptions function in decode.c in Snort before 2.3.0, when printing TCP/IP options using FAST output or verbose mode, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via packets with invalid TCP/IP options, which trigger a null dereference.

  • CVE-2007-1398Mar 10, 2007
    risk 0.03cvss epss 0.06

    The frag3 preprocessor in Snort 2.6.1.1, 2.6.1.2, and 2.7.0 beta, when configured for inline use on Linux without the ip_conntrack module loaded, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and application crash) via certain UDP packets produced by…

  • CVE-2002-0115Mar 25, 2002
    risk 0.03cvss epss 0.04

    Snort 1.8.3 does not properly define the minimum ICMP header size, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and core dump) via a malformed ICMP packet.

  • CVE-2001-0669Oct 30, 2001
    risk 0.03cvss epss 0.04

    Various Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) including (1) Cisco Secure Intrusion Detection System, (2) Cisco Catalyst 6000 Intrusion Detection System Module, (3) Dragon Sensor 4.x, (4) Snort before 1.8.1, (5) ISS RealSecure Network Sensor 5.x and 6.x before XPU 3.2, and (6) ISS…

  • CVE-2003-0033Mar 7, 2003
    risk 0.01cvss epss 0.12

    Buffer overflow in the RPC preprocessor for Snort 1.8 and 1.9.x before 1.9.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via fragmented RPC packets.

  • CVE-2008-1804May 22, 2008
    risk 0.00cvss epss 0.02

    preprocessors/spp_frag3.c in Sourcefire Snort before 2.8.1 does not properly identify packet fragments that have dissimilar TTL values, which allows remote attackers to bypass detection rules by using a different TTL for each fragment.

Page 1 of 2