rpm package
almalinux/nodejs-nodemon
pkg:rpm/almalinux/nodejs-nodemon
Vulnerabilities (146)
| CVE | Sev | CVSS | KEV | Affected versions | Fixed in | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-9516 | — | < 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3 | 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3 | Aug 13, 2019 | Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations a | ||
| CVE-2019-9515 | — | < 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3 | 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3 | Aug 13, 2019 | Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame | ||
| CVE-2019-9513 | — | < 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3 | 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3 | Aug 13, 2019 | Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consu | ||
| CVE-2019-9512 | — | < 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3 | 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3 | Aug 13, 2019 | Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends continual pings to an HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consum | ||
| CVE-2019-9511 | — | < 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3 | 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3 | Aug 13, 2019 | Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and | ||
| CVE-2019-9514 | — | < 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3 | 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3 | Aug 13, 2019 | Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer |
- CVE-2019-9516Aug 13, 2019affected < 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3fixed 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations a
- CVE-2019-9515Aug 13, 2019affected < 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3fixed 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame
- CVE-2019-9513Aug 13, 2019affected < 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3fixed 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consu
- CVE-2019-9512Aug 13, 2019affected < 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3fixed 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends continual pings to an HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consum
- CVE-2019-9511Aug 13, 2019affected < 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3fixed 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and
- CVE-2019-9514Aug 13, 2019affected < 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3fixed 1.18.3-1.module_el8.3.0+2023+d2377ea3
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer
Page 8 of 8