apk package
wolfi/cue
pkg:apk/wolfi/cue
Vulnerabilities (36)
| CVE | Sev | CVSS | KEV | Affected versions | Fixed in | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-33814 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0 | 0 | May 7, 2026 | When processing HTTP/2 SETTINGS frames, transport will enter an infinite loop of writing CONTINUATION frames if it receives a SETTINGS_MAX_FRAME_SIZE with a value of 0. | |
| CVE-2026-32289 | Med | 6.1 | < 0.16.1-r1 | 0.16.1-r1 | Apr 8, 2026 | Context was not properly tracked across template branches for JS template literals, leading to possibly incorrect escaping of content when branches were used. Additionally template actions within JS template literals did not properly track the brace depth, leading to incorrect es | |
| CVE-2026-32288 | Med | 5.5 | < 0 | 0 | Apr 8, 2026 | tar.Reader can allocate an unbounded amount of memory when reading a maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions encoded in the "old GNU sparse map" format. | |
| CVE-2026-32283 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.16.1-r1 | 0.16.1-r1 | Apr 8, 2026 | If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3. | |
| CVE-2026-32282 | Med | 6.4 | < 0 | 0 | Apr 8, 2026 | On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root. The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which R | |
| CVE-2026-32281 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.16.1-r1 | 0.16.1-r1 | Apr 8, 2026 | Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C | |
| CVE-2026-32280 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.16.1-r1 | 0.16.1-r1 | Apr 8, 2026 | During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls | |
| CVE-2026-27140 | Hig | 8.8 | < 0.16.1-r1 | 0.16.1-r1 | Apr 8, 2026 | SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass. | |
| CVE-2026-27141 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0 | 0 | Feb 26, 2026 | Due to missing nil check, sending 0x0a-0x0f HTTP/2 frames will cause a running server to panic | |
| CVE-2025-68121 | Cri | 10.0 | < 0.15.4-r3 | 0.15.4-r3 | Feb 5, 2026 | During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and | |
| CVE-2025-61732 | — | < 0.15.4-r3 | 0.15.4-r3 | Feb 5, 2026 | A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary. | ||
| CVE-2025-58187 | — | < 0.14.2-r1 | 0.14.2-r1 | Oct 29, 2025 | Due to the design of the name constraint checking algorithm, the processing time of some inputs scale non-linearly with respect to the size of the certificate. This affects programs which validate arbitrary certificate chains. | ||
| CVE-2025-47907 | — | < 0 | 0 | Aug 7, 2025 | Cancelling a query (e.g. by cancelling the context passed to one of the query methods) during a call to the Scan method of the returned Rows can result in unexpected results if other queries are being made in parallel. This can result in a race condition that may overwrite the ex | ||
| CVE-2025-22872 | Med | 6.5 | < 0.12.1-r1 | 0.12.1-r1 | Apr 16, 2025 | The tokenizer incorrectly interprets tags with unquoted attribute values that end with a solidus character (/) as self-closing. When directly using Tokenizer, this can result in such tags incorrectly being marked as self-closing, and when using the Parse functions, this can resul | |
| CVE-2025-22870 | Med | 4.4 | < 0.12.0-r2 | 0.12.0-r2 | Mar 12, 2025 | Matching of hosts against proxy patterns can improperly treat an IPv6 zone ID as a hostname component. For example, when the NO_PROXY environment variable is set to "*.example.com", a request to "[::1%25.example.com]:80` will incorrectly match and not be proxied. | |
| CVE-2025-22868 | — | < 0.12.0-r2 | 0.12.0-r2 | Feb 26, 2025 | An attacker can pass a malicious malformed token which causes unexpected memory to be consumed during parsing. | ||
| CVE-2025-22866 | Med | 4.0 | < 0.12.0-r1 | 0.12.0-r1 | Feb 6, 2025 | Due to the usage of a variable time instruction in the assembly implementation of an internal function, a small number of bits of secret scalars are leaked on the ppc64le architecture. Due to the way this function is used, we do not believe this leakage is enough to allow recover | |
| CVE-2024-45338 | Med | 5.3 | < 0.11.1-r1 | 0.11.1-r1 | Dec 18, 2024 | An attacker can craft an input to the Parse functions that would be processed non-linearly with respect to its length, resulting in extremely slow parsing. This could cause a denial of service. | |
| CVE-2024-34158 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.10.0-r1 | 0.10.0-r1 | Sep 6, 2024 | Calling Parse on a "// +build" build tag line with deeply nested expressions can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. | |
| CVE-2024-34156 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.10.0-r1 | 0.10.0-r1 | Sep 6, 2024 | Calling Decoder.Decode on a message which contains deeply nested structures can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. This is a follow-up to CVE-2022-30635. |
- affected < 0fixed 0
When processing HTTP/2 SETTINGS frames, transport will enter an infinite loop of writing CONTINUATION frames if it receives a SETTINGS_MAX_FRAME_SIZE with a value of 0.
- affected < 0.16.1-r1fixed 0.16.1-r1
Context was not properly tracked across template branches for JS template literals, leading to possibly incorrect escaping of content when branches were used. Additionally template actions within JS template literals did not properly track the brace depth, leading to incorrect es
- affected < 0fixed 0
tar.Reader can allocate an unbounded amount of memory when reading a maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions encoded in the "old GNU sparse map" format.
- affected < 0.16.1-r1fixed 0.16.1-r1
If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3.
- affected < 0fixed 0
On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root. The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which R
- affected < 0.16.1-r1fixed 0.16.1-r1
Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C
- affected < 0.16.1-r1fixed 0.16.1-r1
During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls
- affected < 0.16.1-r1fixed 0.16.1-r1
SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Due to missing nil check, sending 0x0a-0x0f HTTP/2 frames will cause a running server to panic
- affected < 0.15.4-r3fixed 0.15.4-r3
During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and
- CVE-2025-61732Feb 5, 2026affected < 0.15.4-r3fixed 0.15.4-r3
A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.
- CVE-2025-58187Oct 29, 2025affected < 0.14.2-r1fixed 0.14.2-r1
Due to the design of the name constraint checking algorithm, the processing time of some inputs scale non-linearly with respect to the size of the certificate. This affects programs which validate arbitrary certificate chains.
- CVE-2025-47907Aug 7, 2025affected < 0fixed 0
Cancelling a query (e.g. by cancelling the context passed to one of the query methods) during a call to the Scan method of the returned Rows can result in unexpected results if other queries are being made in parallel. This can result in a race condition that may overwrite the ex
- affected < 0.12.1-r1fixed 0.12.1-r1
The tokenizer incorrectly interprets tags with unquoted attribute values that end with a solidus character (/) as self-closing. When directly using Tokenizer, this can result in such tags incorrectly being marked as self-closing, and when using the Parse functions, this can resul
- affected < 0.12.0-r2fixed 0.12.0-r2
Matching of hosts against proxy patterns can improperly treat an IPv6 zone ID as a hostname component. For example, when the NO_PROXY environment variable is set to "*.example.com", a request to "[::1%25.example.com]:80` will incorrectly match and not be proxied.
- CVE-2025-22868Feb 26, 2025affected < 0.12.0-r2fixed 0.12.0-r2
An attacker can pass a malicious malformed token which causes unexpected memory to be consumed during parsing.
- affected < 0.12.0-r1fixed 0.12.0-r1
Due to the usage of a variable time instruction in the assembly implementation of an internal function, a small number of bits of secret scalars are leaked on the ppc64le architecture. Due to the way this function is used, we do not believe this leakage is enough to allow recover
- affected < 0.11.1-r1fixed 0.11.1-r1
An attacker can craft an input to the Parse functions that would be processed non-linearly with respect to its length, resulting in extremely slow parsing. This could cause a denial of service.
- affected < 0.10.0-r1fixed 0.10.0-r1
Calling Parse on a "// +build" build tag line with deeply nested expressions can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion.
- affected < 0.10.0-r1fixed 0.10.0-r1
Calling Decoder.Decode on a message which contains deeply nested structures can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. This is a follow-up to CVE-2022-30635.
Page 1 of 2