apk package
wolfi/chelm
pkg:apk/wolfi/chelm
Vulnerabilities (23)
| CVE | Sev | CVSS | KEV | Affected versions | Fixed in | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-25679 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.0.44-r1 | 0.0.44-r1 | Mar 6, 2026 | url.Parse insufficiently validated the host/authority component and accepted some invalid URLs. | |
| CVE-2025-68121 | Cri | 10.0 | < 0.0.41-r0 | 0.0.41-r0 | Feb 5, 2026 | During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and | |
| CVE-2025-61732 | — | < 0.0.41-r0 | 0.0.41-r0 | Feb 5, 2026 | A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary. |
- affected < 0.0.44-r1fixed 0.0.44-r1
url.Parse insufficiently validated the host/authority component and accepted some invalid URLs.
- affected < 0.0.41-r0fixed 0.0.41-r0
During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and
- CVE-2025-61732Feb 5, 2026affected < 0.0.41-r0fixed 0.0.41-r0
A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.
Page 2 of 2