apk package
chainguard/trust-package-fips
pkg:apk/chainguard/trust-package-fips
Vulnerabilities (23)
| CVE | Sev | CVSS | KEV | Affected versions | Fixed in | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-27140 | Hig | 8.8 | < 0.22.1-r3 | 0.22.1-r3 | Apr 8, 2026 | SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass. | |
| CVE-2025-68121 | Cri | 10.0 | < 0 | 0 | Feb 5, 2026 | During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and | |
| CVE-2025-61732 | — | < 0.20.3-r3 | 0.20.3-r3 | Feb 5, 2026 | A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary. |
- affected < 0.22.1-r3fixed 0.22.1-r3
SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.
- affected < 0fixed 0
During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and
- CVE-2025-61732Feb 5, 2026affected < 0.20.3-r3fixed 0.20.3-r3
A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.
Page 2 of 2