apk package
chainguard/terraform-provider-azuread
pkg:apk/chainguard/terraform-provider-azuread
Vulnerabilities (35)
| CVE | Sev | CVSS | KEV | Affected versions | Fixed in | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-58186 | Med | 5.3 | < 3.6.0-r1 | 3.6.0-r1 | Oct 29, 2025 | Despite HTTP headers having a default limit of 1MB, the number of cookies that can be parsed does not have a limit. By sending a lot of very small cookies such as "a=;", an attacker can make an HTTP server allocate a large amount of structs, causing large memory consumption. | |
| CVE-2025-58183 | Med | 4.3 | < 3.6.0-r1 | 3.6.0-r1 | Oct 29, 2025 | tar.Reader does not set a maximum size on the number of sparse region data blocks in GNU tar pax 1.0 sparse files. A maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions can cause a Reader to read an unbounded amount of data from the archive into memory. When r | |
| CVE-2025-61724 | — | < 3.6.0-r1 | 3.6.0-r1 | Oct 29, 2025 | The Reader.ReadResponse function constructs a response string through repeated string concatenation of lines. When the number of lines in a response is large, this can cause excessive CPU consumption. | ||
| CVE-2025-58188 | — | < 3.6.0-r1 | 3.6.0-r1 | Oct 29, 2025 | Validating certificate chains which contain DSA public keys can cause programs to panic, due to a interface cast that assumes they implement the Equal method. This affects programs which validate arbitrary certificate chains. | ||
| CVE-2025-58185 | — | < 3.6.0-r1 | 3.6.0-r1 | Oct 29, 2025 | Parsing a maliciously crafted DER payload could allocate large amounts of memory, causing memory exhaustion. | ||
| CVE-2025-47912 | — | < 3.6.0-r1 | 3.6.0-r1 | Oct 29, 2025 | The Parse function permits values other than IPv6 addresses to be included in square brackets within the host component of a URL. RFC 3986 permits IPv6 addresses to be included within the host component, enclosed within square brackets. For example: "http://[::1]/". IPv4 addresse | ||
| CVE-2025-61723 | — | < 3.6.0-r1 | 3.6.0-r1 | Oct 29, 2025 | The processing time for parsing some invalid inputs scales non-linearly with respect to the size of the input. This affects programs which parse untrusted PEM inputs. | ||
| CVE-2025-58189 | — | < 3.6.0-r1 | 3.6.0-r1 | Oct 29, 2025 | When Conn.Handshake fails during ALPN negotiation the error contains attacker controlled information (the ALPN protocols sent by the client) which is not escaped. | ||
| CVE-2025-58187 | — | < 3.6.0-r1 | 3.6.0-r1 | Oct 29, 2025 | Due to the design of the name constraint checking algorithm, the processing time of some inputs scale non-linearly with respect to the size of the certificate. This affects programs which validate arbitrary certificate chains. | ||
| CVE-2025-4673 | Med | 6.8 | < 3.4.0-r1 | 3.4.0-r1 | Jun 11, 2025 | Proxy-Authorization and Proxy-Authenticate headers persisted on cross-origin redirects potentially leaking sensitive information. | |
| CVE-2025-22874 | Hig | 7.5 | < 3.4.0-r1 | 3.4.0-r1 | Jun 11, 2025 | Calling Verify with a VerifyOptions.KeyUsages that contains ExtKeyUsageAny unintentionally disabledpolicy validation. This only affected certificate chains which contain policy graphs, which are rather uncommon. | |
| CVE-2025-22872 | Med | 6.5 | < 3.3.0-r1 | 3.3.0-r1 | Apr 16, 2025 | The tokenizer incorrectly interprets tags with unquoted attribute values that end with a solidus character (/) as self-closing. When directly using Tokenizer, this can result in such tags incorrectly being marked as self-closing, and when using the Parse functions, this can resul | |
| CVE-2025-22870 | Med | 4.4 | < 3.2.0-r1 | 3.2.0-r1 | Mar 12, 2025 | Matching of hosts against proxy patterns can improperly treat an IPv6 zone ID as a hostname component. For example, when the NO_PROXY environment variable is set to "*.example.com", a request to "[::1%25.example.com]:80` will incorrectly match and not be proxied. | |
| CVE-2025-22868 | — | < 3.2.0-r2 | 3.2.0-r2 | Feb 26, 2025 | An attacker can pass a malicious malformed token which causes unexpected memory to be consumed during parsing. | ||
| CVE-2025-22869 | — | < 3.2.0-r1 | 3.2.0-r1 | Feb 26, 2025 | SSH servers which implement file transfer protocols are vulnerable to a denial of service attack from clients which complete the key exchange slowly, or not at all, causing pending content to be read into memory, but never transmitted. |
- affected < 3.6.0-r1fixed 3.6.0-r1
Despite HTTP headers having a default limit of 1MB, the number of cookies that can be parsed does not have a limit. By sending a lot of very small cookies such as "a=;", an attacker can make an HTTP server allocate a large amount of structs, causing large memory consumption.
- affected < 3.6.0-r1fixed 3.6.0-r1
tar.Reader does not set a maximum size on the number of sparse region data blocks in GNU tar pax 1.0 sparse files. A maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions can cause a Reader to read an unbounded amount of data from the archive into memory. When r
- CVE-2025-61724Oct 29, 2025affected < 3.6.0-r1fixed 3.6.0-r1
The Reader.ReadResponse function constructs a response string through repeated string concatenation of lines. When the number of lines in a response is large, this can cause excessive CPU consumption.
- CVE-2025-58188Oct 29, 2025affected < 3.6.0-r1fixed 3.6.0-r1
Validating certificate chains which contain DSA public keys can cause programs to panic, due to a interface cast that assumes they implement the Equal method. This affects programs which validate arbitrary certificate chains.
- CVE-2025-58185Oct 29, 2025affected < 3.6.0-r1fixed 3.6.0-r1
Parsing a maliciously crafted DER payload could allocate large amounts of memory, causing memory exhaustion.
- CVE-2025-47912Oct 29, 2025affected < 3.6.0-r1fixed 3.6.0-r1
The Parse function permits values other than IPv6 addresses to be included in square brackets within the host component of a URL. RFC 3986 permits IPv6 addresses to be included within the host component, enclosed within square brackets. For example: "http://[::1]/". IPv4 addresse
- CVE-2025-61723Oct 29, 2025affected < 3.6.0-r1fixed 3.6.0-r1
The processing time for parsing some invalid inputs scales non-linearly with respect to the size of the input. This affects programs which parse untrusted PEM inputs.
- CVE-2025-58189Oct 29, 2025affected < 3.6.0-r1fixed 3.6.0-r1
When Conn.Handshake fails during ALPN negotiation the error contains attacker controlled information (the ALPN protocols sent by the client) which is not escaped.
- CVE-2025-58187Oct 29, 2025affected < 3.6.0-r1fixed 3.6.0-r1
Due to the design of the name constraint checking algorithm, the processing time of some inputs scale non-linearly with respect to the size of the certificate. This affects programs which validate arbitrary certificate chains.
- affected < 3.4.0-r1fixed 3.4.0-r1
Proxy-Authorization and Proxy-Authenticate headers persisted on cross-origin redirects potentially leaking sensitive information.
- affected < 3.4.0-r1fixed 3.4.0-r1
Calling Verify with a VerifyOptions.KeyUsages that contains ExtKeyUsageAny unintentionally disabledpolicy validation. This only affected certificate chains which contain policy graphs, which are rather uncommon.
- affected < 3.3.0-r1fixed 3.3.0-r1
The tokenizer incorrectly interprets tags with unquoted attribute values that end with a solidus character (/) as self-closing. When directly using Tokenizer, this can result in such tags incorrectly being marked as self-closing, and when using the Parse functions, this can resul
- affected < 3.2.0-r1fixed 3.2.0-r1
Matching of hosts against proxy patterns can improperly treat an IPv6 zone ID as a hostname component. For example, when the NO_PROXY environment variable is set to "*.example.com", a request to "[::1%25.example.com]:80` will incorrectly match and not be proxied.
- CVE-2025-22868Feb 26, 2025affected < 3.2.0-r2fixed 3.2.0-r2
An attacker can pass a malicious malformed token which causes unexpected memory to be consumed during parsing.
- CVE-2025-22869Feb 26, 2025affected < 3.2.0-r1fixed 3.2.0-r1
SSH servers which implement file transfer protocols are vulnerable to a denial of service attack from clients which complete the key exchange slowly, or not at all, causing pending content to be read into memory, but never transmitted.
Page 2 of 2