apk package
chainguard/terraform-provider-aws
pkg:apk/chainguard/terraform-provider-aws
Vulnerabilities (30)
| CVE | Sev | CVSS | KEV | Affected versions | Fixed in | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-78662 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0 | 0 | Sep 2, 2026 | Previously, a channel registered in the mux's chanList is not usable until it is established. A malicious peer was able flood the channel's incomingRequests, deadlocking the entire connection. Now, we add an atomic established state, set when a channel becomes usable. Until such | |
| CVE-2026-56855 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0 | 0 | Sep 2, 2026 | Previously, after a channel has been established, a malicious peer could send crafted messages that would deadlock the entire connection. Now, we handle all RFC 4254 channel messages; global requests are handled explicitly. Then, treat all other messages as a protocol error and t | |
| CVE-2026-84304 | Hig | — | < 6.63.0-r0 | 6.63.0-r0 | Sep 1, 2026 | gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Prior to 1.83.1, internal/transport/transport.go stores each fragmented HTTP/2 DATA frame as a separate recvMsg in recvBuffer, so millions of one-byte frames can consume disproportionate heap memory even when payload bytes remain | |
| CVE-2026-56865 | Hig | 8.4 | < 0 | 0 | Aug 13, 2026 | A malicious GOPROXY was previously capable of forging up to two sumdb tiles that allow for a requested module to bypass the GOSUMDB check and persist attacker-controlled module content to a local Go module cache. This attack allows for a malicious GOPROXY to serve malicious modul | |
| CVE-2026-56864 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0 | 0 | Aug 13, 2026 | A malicious GOSUMDB was capable of serving arbitrary module content not contained within the transparency log. This attack allows for a coordinating GOPROXY and GOSUMDB to serve a client malicious module content that cannot be detected by evaluating the transparency log. In order | |
| CVE-2026-42505 | Med | 5.3 | < 6.54.0-r1 | 6.54.0-r1 | Jul 8, 2026 | Handshakes which used Encrypted Client Hello could be de-anonymized by a passive network observer due to a disclosure of pre-shared key identities in the unencrypted client hello. | |
| CVE-2026-39822 | Hig | 7.8 | < 0 | 0 | Jul 8, 2026 | On Unix systems, opening a file in an os.Root improperly follows symlinks to locations outside of the Root when the final path component of the a path is a symbolic link and the path ends in /. For example, 'root.Open("symlink/")' will open "symlink" even when "symlink" is a symb | |
| CVE-2026-32289 | Med | 6.1 | < 6.47.0-r0 | 6.47.0-r0 | Apr 8, 2026 | Context was not properly tracked across template branches for JS template literals, leading to possibly incorrect escaping of content when branches were used. Additionally template actions within JS template literals did not properly track the brace depth, leading to incorrect es | |
| CVE-2026-32288 | Med | 5.5 | < 0 | 0 | Apr 8, 2026 | tar.Reader can allocate an unbounded amount of memory when reading a maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions encoded in the "old GNU sparse map" format. | |
| CVE-2026-32283 | Hig | 7.5 | < 6.47.0-r0 | 6.47.0-r0 | Apr 8, 2026 | If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3. | |
| CVE-2026-32282 | Med | 6.4 | < 0 | 0 | Apr 8, 2026 | On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root. The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which R | |
| CVE-2026-32281 | Hig | 7.5 | < 6.47.0-r0 | 6.47.0-r0 | Apr 8, 2026 | Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C | |
| CVE-2026-32280 | Hig | 7.5 | < 6.47.0-r0 | 6.47.0-r0 | Apr 8, 2026 | During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls | |
| CVE-2026-27140 | Hig | 8.8 | < 6.47.0-r0 | 6.47.0-r0 | Apr 8, 2026 | SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass. | |
| CVE-2026-33186 | Cri | 9.1 | < 6.37.0-r1 | 6.37.0-r1 | Mar 20, 2026 | gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 `:path` pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the `:path` omi | |
| CVE-2026-27141 | Hig | 7.5 | < 6.34.0-r1 | 6.34.0-r1 | Feb 26, 2026 | Due to missing nil check, sending 0x0a-0x0f HTTP/2 frames will cause a running server to panic | |
| CVE-2024-45338 | Med | 5.3 | < 5.82.2-r0 | 5.82.2-r0 | Dec 18, 2024 | An attacker can craft an input to the Parse functions that would be processed non-linearly with respect to its length, resulting in extremely slow parsing. This could cause a denial of service. | |
| CVE-2024-45337 | Cri | 9.1 | < 5.80.0-r1 | 5.80.0-r1 | Dec 12, 2024 | Applications and libraries which misuse connection.serverAuthenticate (via callback field ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback) may be susceptible to an authorization bypass. The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that | |
| CVE-2024-34158 | Hig | 7.5 | < 5.66.0-r0 | 5.66.0-r0 | Sep 6, 2024 | Calling Parse on a "// +build" build tag line with deeply nested expressions can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. | |
| CVE-2024-34156 | Hig | 7.5 | < 5.66.0-r0 | 5.66.0-r0 | Sep 6, 2024 | Calling Decoder.Decode on a message which contains deeply nested structures can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. This is a follow-up to CVE-2022-30635. |
- affected < 0fixed 0
Previously, a channel registered in the mux's chanList is not usable until it is established. A malicious peer was able flood the channel's incomingRequests, deadlocking the entire connection. Now, we add an atomic established state, set when a channel becomes usable. Until such
- affected < 0fixed 0
Previously, after a channel has been established, a malicious peer could send crafted messages that would deadlock the entire connection. Now, we handle all RFC 4254 channel messages; global requests are handled explicitly. Then, treat all other messages as a protocol error and t
- affected < 6.63.0-r0fixed 6.63.0-r0
gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Prior to 1.83.1, internal/transport/transport.go stores each fragmented HTTP/2 DATA frame as a separate recvMsg in recvBuffer, so millions of one-byte frames can consume disproportionate heap memory even when payload bytes remain
- affected < 0fixed 0
A malicious GOPROXY was previously capable of forging up to two sumdb tiles that allow for a requested module to bypass the GOSUMDB check and persist attacker-controlled module content to a local Go module cache. This attack allows for a malicious GOPROXY to serve malicious modul
- affected < 0fixed 0
A malicious GOSUMDB was capable of serving arbitrary module content not contained within the transparency log. This attack allows for a coordinating GOPROXY and GOSUMDB to serve a client malicious module content that cannot be detected by evaluating the transparency log. In order
- affected < 6.54.0-r1fixed 6.54.0-r1
Handshakes which used Encrypted Client Hello could be de-anonymized by a passive network observer due to a disclosure of pre-shared key identities in the unencrypted client hello.
- affected < 0fixed 0
On Unix systems, opening a file in an os.Root improperly follows symlinks to locations outside of the Root when the final path component of the a path is a symbolic link and the path ends in /. For example, 'root.Open("symlink/")' will open "symlink" even when "symlink" is a symb
- affected < 6.47.0-r0fixed 6.47.0-r0
Context was not properly tracked across template branches for JS template literals, leading to possibly incorrect escaping of content when branches were used. Additionally template actions within JS template literals did not properly track the brace depth, leading to incorrect es
- affected < 0fixed 0
tar.Reader can allocate an unbounded amount of memory when reading a maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions encoded in the "old GNU sparse map" format.
- affected < 6.47.0-r0fixed 6.47.0-r0
If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3.
- affected < 0fixed 0
On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root. The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which R
- affected < 6.47.0-r0fixed 6.47.0-r0
Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C
- affected < 6.47.0-r0fixed 6.47.0-r0
During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls
- affected < 6.47.0-r0fixed 6.47.0-r0
SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.
- affected < 6.37.0-r1fixed 6.37.0-r1
gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 `:path` pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the `:path` omi
- affected < 6.34.0-r1fixed 6.34.0-r1
Due to missing nil check, sending 0x0a-0x0f HTTP/2 frames will cause a running server to panic
- affected < 5.82.2-r0fixed 5.82.2-r0
An attacker can craft an input to the Parse functions that would be processed non-linearly with respect to its length, resulting in extremely slow parsing. This could cause a denial of service.
- affected < 5.80.0-r1fixed 5.80.0-r1
Applications and libraries which misuse connection.serverAuthenticate (via callback field ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback) may be susceptible to an authorization bypass. The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that
- affected < 5.66.0-r0fixed 5.66.0-r0
Calling Parse on a "// +build" build tag line with deeply nested expressions can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion.
- affected < 5.66.0-r0fixed 5.66.0-r0
Calling Decoder.Decode on a message which contains deeply nested structures can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. This is a follow-up to CVE-2022-30635.
Page 1 of 2