VYPR

apk package

chainguard/tekton-pipelines-resolvers-fips-0.68

pkg:apk/chainguard/tekton-pipelines-resolvers-fips-0.68

Vulnerabilities (48)

  • CVE-2026-32281HigApr 8, 2026
    affected < 0.68.1-r20fixed 0.68.1-r20

    Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C

  • CVE-2026-32280HigApr 8, 2026
    affected < 0.68.1-r20fixed 0.68.1-r20

    During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls

  • CVE-2026-27144HigApr 8, 2026
    affected < 0.68.1-r20fixed 0.68.1-r20

    The compiler is meant to unwrap pointers which are the operands of a memory move; a no-op interface conversion prevented the compiler from making the correct determination about non-overlapping moves, potentially leading to memory corruption at runtime.

  • CVE-2026-27143CriApr 8, 2026
    affected < 0.68.1-r20fixed 0.68.1-r20

    Arithmetic over induction variables in loops were not correctly checked for underflow or overflow. As a result, the compiler would allow for invalid indexing to occur at runtime, potentially leading to memory corruption.

  • CVE-2026-27140HigApr 8, 2026
    affected < 0.68.1-r20fixed 0.68.1-r20

    SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.

  • CVE-2026-33186CriMar 20, 2026
    affected < 0.68.1-r19fixed 0.68.1-r19

    gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 `:path` pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the `:path` omi

  • CVE-2026-27142MedMar 6, 2026
    affected < 0.68.1-r18fixed 0.68.1-r18

    Actions which insert URLs into the content attribute of HTML meta tags are not escaped. This can allow XSS if the meta tag also has an http-equiv attribute with the value "refresh". A new GODEBUG setting has been added, htmlmetacontenturlescape, which can be used to disable escap

  • CVE-2026-27139LowMar 6, 2026
    affected < 0.68.1-r18fixed 0.68.1-r18

    On Unix platforms, when listing the contents of a directory using File.ReadDir or File.Readdir the returned FileInfo could reference a file outside of the Root in which the File was opened. The impact of this escape is limited to reading metadata provided by lstat from arbitrary

  • CVE-2026-25679HigMar 6, 2026
    affected < 0.68.1-r18fixed 0.68.1-r18

    url.Parse insufficiently validated the host/authority component and accepted some invalid URLs.

  • CVE-2026-27141HigFeb 26, 2026
    affected < 0.68.1-r16fixed 0.68.1-r16

    Due to missing nil check, sending 0x0a-0x0f HTTP/2 frames will cause a running server to panic

  • CVE-2026-1229Feb 24, 2026
    affected < 0.68.1-r14fixed 0.68.1-r14

    The CombinedMult function in the CIRCL ecc/p384 package (secp384r1 curve) produces an incorrect value for specific inputs. The issue is fixed by using complete addition formulas. ECDH and ECDSA signing relying on this curve are not affected. The bug was fixed in v1.6.3 https://

  • CVE-2026-25934Feb 9, 2026
    affected < 0.68.1-r13fixed 0.68.1-r13

    go-git is a highly extensible git implementation library written in pure Go. Prior to 5.16.5, a vulnerability was discovered in go-git whereby data integrity values for .pack and .idx files were not properly verified. This resulted in go-git potentially consuming corrupted files,

  • CVE-2025-68121CriFeb 5, 2026
    affected < 0.68.1-r12fixed 0.68.1-r12

    During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and

  • CVE-2025-61732Feb 5, 2026
    affected < 0.68.1-r12fixed 0.68.1-r12

    A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.

  • CVE-2025-47914Nov 19, 2025
    affected < 0fixed 0

    SSH Agent servers do not validate the size of messages when processing new identity requests, which may cause the program to panic if the message is malformed due to an out of bounds read.

  • CVE-2025-58181Nov 19, 2025
    affected < 0fixed 0

    SSH servers parsing GSSAPI authentication requests do not validate the number of mechanisms specified in the request, allowing an attacker to cause unbounded memory consumption.

  • CVE-2025-61725HigOct 29, 2025
    affected < 0.68.1-r6fixed 0.68.1-r6

    The ParseAddress function constructs domain-literal address components through repeated string concatenation. When parsing large domain-literal components, this can cause excessive CPU consumption.

  • CVE-2025-58186MedOct 29, 2025
    affected < 0.68.1-r6fixed 0.68.1-r6

    Despite HTTP headers having a default limit of 1MB, the number of cookies that can be parsed does not have a limit. By sending a lot of very small cookies such as "a=;", an attacker can make an HTTP server allocate a large amount of structs, causing large memory consumption.

  • CVE-2025-58183MedOct 29, 2025
    affected < 0.68.1-r6fixed 0.68.1-r6

    tar.Reader does not set a maximum size on the number of sparse region data blocks in GNU tar pax 1.0 sparse files. A maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions can cause a Reader to read an unbounded amount of data from the archive into memory. When r

  • CVE-2025-61724Oct 29, 2025
    affected < 0.68.1-r6fixed 0.68.1-r6

    The Reader.ReadResponse function constructs a response string through repeated string concatenation of lines. When the number of lines in a response is large, this can cause excessive CPU consumption.