apk package
chainguard/podcli-fips
pkg:apk/chainguard/podcli-fips
Vulnerabilities (28)
| CVE | Sev | CVSS | KEV | Affected versions | Fixed in | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-32283 | Hig | 7.5 | < 6.12.0-r2 | 6.12.0-r2 | Apr 8, 2026 | If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3. | |
| CVE-2026-32282 | Med | 6.4 | < 0 | 0 | Apr 8, 2026 | On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root. The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which R | |
| CVE-2026-32281 | Hig | 7.5 | < 6.12.0-r2 | 6.12.0-r2 | Apr 8, 2026 | Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C | |
| CVE-2026-32280 | Hig | 7.5 | < 6.12.0-r2 | 6.12.0-r2 | Apr 8, 2026 | During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls | |
| CVE-2026-27140 | Hig | 8.8 | < 6.12.0-r2 | 6.12.0-r2 | Apr 8, 2026 | SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass. | |
| CVE-2026-33186 | Cri | 9.1 | < 6.11.1-r1 | 6.11.1-r1 | Mar 20, 2026 | gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 `:path` pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the `:path` omi | |
| CVE-2025-68121 | Cri | 10.0 | < 6.10.1-r1 | 6.10.1-r1 | Feb 5, 2026 | During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and | |
| CVE-2025-61732 | — | < 6.10.1-r1 | 6.10.1-r1 | Feb 5, 2026 | A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary. |
- affected < 6.12.0-r2fixed 6.12.0-r2
If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3.
- affected < 0fixed 0
On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root. The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which R
- affected < 6.12.0-r2fixed 6.12.0-r2
Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C
- affected < 6.12.0-r2fixed 6.12.0-r2
During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls
- affected < 6.12.0-r2fixed 6.12.0-r2
SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.
- affected < 6.11.1-r1fixed 6.11.1-r1
gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 `:path` pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the `:path` omi
- affected < 6.10.1-r1fixed 6.10.1-r1
During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and
- CVE-2025-61732Feb 5, 2026affected < 6.10.1-r1fixed 6.10.1-r1
A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.
Page 2 of 2