apk package
chainguard/kube-webhook-certgen-fips-1.13
pkg:apk/chainguard/kube-webhook-certgen-fips-1.13
Vulnerabilities (27)
| CVE | Sev | CVSS | KEV | Affected versions | Fixed in | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-32281 | Hig | 7.5 | < 1.13.9-r2 | 1.13.9-r2 | Apr 8, 2026 | Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C | |
| CVE-2026-32280 | Hig | 7.5 | < 1.13.9-r2 | 1.13.9-r2 | Apr 8, 2026 | During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls | |
| CVE-2026-27140 | Hig | 8.8 | < 1.13.9-r2 | 1.13.9-r2 | Apr 8, 2026 | SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass. | |
| CVE-2025-68121 | Cri | 10.0 | < 1.13.7-r3 | 1.13.7-r3 | Feb 5, 2026 | During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and | |
| CVE-2025-61732 | — | < 1.13.7-r3 | 1.13.7-r3 | Feb 5, 2026 | A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary. | ||
| CVE-2025-61729 | — | < 1.13.5-r0 | 1.13.5-r0 | Dec 2, 2025 | Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime. Therefore, a certificate provided by a | ||
| CVE-2025-47907 | — | < 0 | 0 | Aug 7, 2025 | Cancelling a query (e.g. by cancelling the context passed to one of the query methods) during a call to the Scan method of the returned Rows can result in unexpected results if other queries are being made in parallel. This can result in a race condition that may overwrite the ex |
- affected < 1.13.9-r2fixed 1.13.9-r2
Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C
- affected < 1.13.9-r2fixed 1.13.9-r2
During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls
- affected < 1.13.9-r2fixed 1.13.9-r2
SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.
- affected < 1.13.7-r3fixed 1.13.7-r3
During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and
- CVE-2025-61732Feb 5, 2026affected < 1.13.7-r3fixed 1.13.7-r3
A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.
- CVE-2025-61729Dec 2, 2025affected < 1.13.5-r0fixed 1.13.5-r0
Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime. Therefore, a certificate provided by a
- CVE-2025-47907Aug 7, 2025affected < 0fixed 0
Cancelling a query (e.g. by cancelling the context passed to one of the query methods) during a call to the Scan method of the returned Rows can result in unexpected results if other queries are being made in parallel. This can result in a race condition that may overwrite the ex
Page 2 of 2