apk package
chainguard/harbor-cli
pkg:apk/chainguard/harbor-cli
Vulnerabilities (34)
| CVE | Sev | CVSS | KEV | Affected versions | Fixed in | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-42506 | Med | 6.1 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering. | |
| CVE-2026-42502 | Med | 6.1 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering. | |
| CVE-2026-39821 | Cri | 9.6 | < 0.0.22-r2 | 0.0.22-r2 | May 22, 2026 | The ToASCII and ToUnicode functions incorrectly accept Punycode-encoded labels that decode to an ASCII-only label. For example, ToUnicode("xn--example-.com") incorrectly returns the name "example.com" rather than an error. This behavior can lead to privilege escalation in program | |
| CVE-2026-27136 | Med | 6.1 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering. | |
| CVE-2026-25681 | Med | 6.1 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering. | |
| CVE-2026-25680 | Med | 6.5 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML can consume excessive CPU time, possibly leading to denial of service. | |
| CVE-2026-33814 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0 | 0 | May 7, 2026 | When processing HTTP/2 SETTINGS frames, transport will enter an infinite loop of writing CONTINUATION frames if it receives a SETTINGS_MAX_FRAME_SIZE with a value of 0. | |
| CVE-2026-32289 | Med | 6.1 | < 0 | 0 | Apr 8, 2026 | Context was not properly tracked across template branches for JS template literals, leading to possibly incorrect escaping of content when branches were used. Additionally template actions within JS template literals did not properly track the brace depth, leading to incorrect es | |
| CVE-2026-32288 | Med | 5.5 | < 0 | 0 | Apr 8, 2026 | tar.Reader can allocate an unbounded amount of memory when reading a maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions encoded in the "old GNU sparse map" format. | |
| CVE-2026-32283 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.0.22-r0 | 0.0.22-r0 | Apr 8, 2026 | If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3. | |
| CVE-2026-32282 | Med | 6.4 | < 0 | 0 | Apr 8, 2026 | On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root. The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which R | |
| CVE-2026-32281 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.0.22-r0 | 0.0.22-r0 | Apr 8, 2026 | Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C | |
| CVE-2026-32280 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.0.22-r0 | 0.0.22-r0 | Apr 8, 2026 | During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls | |
| CVE-2026-27140 | Hig | 8.8 | < 0.0.22-r0 | 0.0.22-r0 | Apr 8, 2026 | SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass. | |
| CVE-2026-27141 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0 | 0 | Feb 26, 2026 | Due to missing nil check, sending 0x0a-0x0f HTTP/2 frames will cause a running server to panic | |
| CVE-2025-68121 | Cri | 10.0 | < 0.0.17-r0 | 0.0.17-r0 | Feb 5, 2026 | During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and | |
| CVE-2025-61732 | — | < 0.0.17-r0 | 0.0.17-r0 | Feb 5, 2026 | A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary. | ||
| CVE-2025-61729 | — | < 0.0.15-r1 | 0.0.15-r1 | Dec 2, 2025 | Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime. Therefore, a certificate provided by a | ||
| CVE-2025-47910 | Med | 5.4 | < 0.0.11-r1 | 0.0.11-r1 | Sep 22, 2025 | When using http.CrossOriginProtection, the AddInsecureBypassPattern method can unexpectedly bypass more requests than intended. CrossOriginProtection then skips validation, but forwards the original request path, which may be served by a different handler without the intended sec | |
| CVE-2025-47907 | — | < 0.0.8-r2 | 0.0.8-r2 | Aug 7, 2025 | Cancelling a query (e.g. by cancelling the context passed to one of the query methods) during a call to the Scan method of the returned Rows can result in unexpected results if other queries are being made in parallel. This can result in a race condition that may overwrite the ex |
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering.
- affected < 0.0.22-r2fixed 0.0.22-r2
The ToASCII and ToUnicode functions incorrectly accept Punycode-encoded labels that decode to an ASCII-only label. For example, ToUnicode("xn--example-.com") incorrectly returns the name "example.com" rather than an error. This behavior can lead to privilege escalation in program
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML can consume excessive CPU time, possibly leading to denial of service.
- affected < 0fixed 0
When processing HTTP/2 SETTINGS frames, transport will enter an infinite loop of writing CONTINUATION frames if it receives a SETTINGS_MAX_FRAME_SIZE with a value of 0.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Context was not properly tracked across template branches for JS template literals, leading to possibly incorrect escaping of content when branches were used. Additionally template actions within JS template literals did not properly track the brace depth, leading to incorrect es
- affected < 0fixed 0
tar.Reader can allocate an unbounded amount of memory when reading a maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions encoded in the "old GNU sparse map" format.
- affected < 0.0.22-r0fixed 0.0.22-r0
If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3.
- affected < 0fixed 0
On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root. The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which R
- affected < 0.0.22-r0fixed 0.0.22-r0
Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C
- affected < 0.0.22-r0fixed 0.0.22-r0
During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls
- affected < 0.0.22-r0fixed 0.0.22-r0
SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Due to missing nil check, sending 0x0a-0x0f HTTP/2 frames will cause a running server to panic
- affected < 0.0.17-r0fixed 0.0.17-r0
During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and
- CVE-2025-61732Feb 5, 2026affected < 0.0.17-r0fixed 0.0.17-r0
A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.
- CVE-2025-61729Dec 2, 2025affected < 0.0.15-r1fixed 0.0.15-r1
Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime. Therefore, a certificate provided by a
- affected < 0.0.11-r1fixed 0.0.11-r1
When using http.CrossOriginProtection, the AddInsecureBypassPattern method can unexpectedly bypass more requests than intended. CrossOriginProtection then skips validation, but forwards the original request path, which may be served by a different handler without the intended sec
- CVE-2025-47907Aug 7, 2025affected < 0.0.8-r2fixed 0.0.8-r2
Cancelling a query (e.g. by cancelling the context passed to one of the query methods) during a call to the Scan method of the returned Rows can result in unexpected results if other queries are being made in parallel. This can result in a race condition that may overwrite the ex
Page 1 of 2