apk package
chainguard/grpc-health-probe
pkg:apk/chainguard/grpc-health-probe
Vulnerabilities (41)
| CVE | Sev | CVSS | KEV | Affected versions | Fixed in | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-42506 | Med | 6.1 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering. | |
| CVE-2026-42502 | Med | 6.1 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering. | |
| CVE-2026-27136 | Med | 6.1 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering. | |
| CVE-2026-25681 | Med | 6.1 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering. | |
| CVE-2026-25680 | Med | 6.5 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML can consume excessive CPU time, possibly leading to denial of service. | |
| CVE-2026-33814 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0 | 0 | May 7, 2026 | When processing HTTP/2 SETTINGS frames, transport will enter an infinite loop of writing CONTINUATION frames if it receives a SETTINGS_MAX_FRAME_SIZE with a value of 0. | |
| CVE-2026-32289 | Med | 6.1 | < 0.4.51-r0 | 0.4.51-r0 | Apr 8, 2026 | Context was not properly tracked across template branches for JS template literals, leading to possibly incorrect escaping of content when branches were used. Additionally template actions within JS template literals did not properly track the brace depth, leading to incorrect es | |
| CVE-2026-32288 | Med | 5.5 | < 0 | 0 | Apr 8, 2026 | tar.Reader can allocate an unbounded amount of memory when reading a maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions encoded in the "old GNU sparse map" format. | |
| CVE-2026-32283 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.4.51-r0 | 0.4.51-r0 | Apr 8, 2026 | If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3. | |
| CVE-2026-32282 | Med | 6.4 | < 0 | 0 | Apr 8, 2026 | On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root. The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which R | |
| CVE-2026-32281 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.4.51-r0 | 0.4.51-r0 | Apr 8, 2026 | Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C | |
| CVE-2026-32280 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.4.51-r0 | 0.4.51-r0 | Apr 8, 2026 | During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls | |
| CVE-2026-27140 | Hig | 8.8 | < 0.4.51-r0 | 0.4.51-r0 | Apr 8, 2026 | SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass. | |
| CVE-2026-34986 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.4.47-r1 | 0.4.47-r1 | Apr 6, 2026 | Go JOSE provides an implementation of the Javascript Object Signing and Encryption set of standards in Go, including support for JSON Web Encryption (JWE), JSON Web Signature (JWS), and JSON Web Token (JWT) standards. Prior to 4.1.4 and 3.0.5, decrypting a JSON Web Encryption (JW | |
| CVE-2026-33186 | Cri | 9.1 | < 0.4.46-r2 | 0.4.46-r2 | Mar 20, 2026 | gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 `:path` pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the `:path` omi | |
| CVE-2025-61727 | — | < 0.4.42-r1 | 0.4.42-r1 | Dec 3, 2025 | An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com. | ||
| CVE-2025-61729 | — | < 0.4.42-r1 | 0.4.42-r1 | Dec 2, 2025 | Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime. Therefore, a certificate provided by a | ||
| CVE-2025-58187 | — | < 0.4.41-r1 | 0.4.41-r1 | Oct 29, 2025 | Due to the design of the name constraint checking algorithm, the processing time of some inputs scale non-linearly with respect to the size of the certificate. This affects programs which validate arbitrary certificate chains. | ||
| CVE-2025-47907 | — | < 0.4.39-r3 | 0.4.39-r3 | Aug 7, 2025 | Cancelling a query (e.g. by cancelling the context passed to one of the query methods) during a call to the Scan method of the returned Rows can result in unexpected results if other queries are being made in parallel. This can result in a race condition that may overwrite the ex | ||
| CVE-2025-4673 | Med | 6.8 | < 0.4.38-r1 | 0.4.38-r1 | Jun 11, 2025 | Proxy-Authorization and Proxy-Authenticate headers persisted on cross-origin redirects potentially leaking sensitive information. |
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML can consume excessive CPU time, possibly leading to denial of service.
- affected < 0fixed 0
When processing HTTP/2 SETTINGS frames, transport will enter an infinite loop of writing CONTINUATION frames if it receives a SETTINGS_MAX_FRAME_SIZE with a value of 0.
- affected < 0.4.51-r0fixed 0.4.51-r0
Context was not properly tracked across template branches for JS template literals, leading to possibly incorrect escaping of content when branches were used. Additionally template actions within JS template literals did not properly track the brace depth, leading to incorrect es
- affected < 0fixed 0
tar.Reader can allocate an unbounded amount of memory when reading a maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions encoded in the "old GNU sparse map" format.
- affected < 0.4.51-r0fixed 0.4.51-r0
If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3.
- affected < 0fixed 0
On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root. The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which R
- affected < 0.4.51-r0fixed 0.4.51-r0
Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C
- affected < 0.4.51-r0fixed 0.4.51-r0
During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls
- affected < 0.4.51-r0fixed 0.4.51-r0
SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.
- affected < 0.4.47-r1fixed 0.4.47-r1
Go JOSE provides an implementation of the Javascript Object Signing and Encryption set of standards in Go, including support for JSON Web Encryption (JWE), JSON Web Signature (JWS), and JSON Web Token (JWT) standards. Prior to 4.1.4 and 3.0.5, decrypting a JSON Web Encryption (JW
- affected < 0.4.46-r2fixed 0.4.46-r2
gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 `:path` pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the `:path` omi
- CVE-2025-61727Dec 3, 2025affected < 0.4.42-r1fixed 0.4.42-r1
An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com.
- CVE-2025-61729Dec 2, 2025affected < 0.4.42-r1fixed 0.4.42-r1
Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime. Therefore, a certificate provided by a
- CVE-2025-58187Oct 29, 2025affected < 0.4.41-r1fixed 0.4.41-r1
Due to the design of the name constraint checking algorithm, the processing time of some inputs scale non-linearly with respect to the size of the certificate. This affects programs which validate arbitrary certificate chains.
- CVE-2025-47907Aug 7, 2025affected < 0.4.39-r3fixed 0.4.39-r3
Cancelling a query (e.g. by cancelling the context passed to one of the query methods) during a call to the Scan method of the returned Rows can result in unexpected results if other queries are being made in parallel. This can result in a race condition that may overwrite the ex
- affected < 0.4.38-r1fixed 0.4.38-r1
Proxy-Authorization and Proxy-Authenticate headers persisted on cross-origin redirects potentially leaking sensitive information.
Page 1 of 3