apk package
chainguard/gitlab-rails-ce-19.0
pkg:apk/chainguard/gitlab-rails-ce-19.0
Vulnerabilities (48)
| CVE | Sev | CVSS | KEV | Affected versions | Fixed in | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-48038 | — | < 19.0.3-r1 | 19.0.3-r1 | Jun 11, 2026 | ### Impact Denial of service via untrapped exception in services validating user-supplied JSON / object input with recursive link schemas. The blast radius depends on how the application invokes joi: - Highest impact: `validate()` called without `try/catch` in a request handler | ||
| CVE-2026-47242 | — | < 19.0.2-r0 | 19.0.2-r0 | Jun 9, 2026 | ### Summary Two `Net::IMAP` commands, `#id` and `#enable`, do not validate their arguments. Arguments to either command could be used by an attacker to inject arbitrary IMAP commands. Please note that passing untrusted inputs to these commands is usually inappropriate and expe | ||
| CVE-2026-47241 | low | — | < 19.0.2-r0 | 19.0.2-r0 | Jun 9, 2026 | ### Summary Several Net::IMAP commands accept a raw string argument which is only validated to prevent CRLF injection and then sent verbatim. If this string is derived from user-controlled input, an attacker can force the next command to be absorbed as a continuation of the fir | |
| CVE-2026-47240 | — | < 19.0.2-r0 | 19.0.2-r0 | Jun 9, 2026 | Several Net::IMAP commands accept a "raw data" argument that is sent verbatim after validation to prevent command injection. However, if a server does not support non-synchronizing literals, it may still be possible to inject arbitrary IMAP commands inside non-synchronizing lite | ||
| CVE-2026-47737 | hig | — | < 19.0.2-r1 | 19.0.2-r1 | Jun 9, 2026 | ### Impact Puma is vulnerable to source IP spoofing when `set_remote_address proxy_protocol: :v1` is enabled and persistent connections are used. PROXY protocol v1 is a connection-level protocol. [Support was added to Puma in v5.5.0](https://github.com/puma/puma/issues/2651). A | |
| CVE-2026-47736 | hig | — | < 19.0.2-r1 | 19.0.2-r1 | Jun 8, 2026 | ### Impact [PROXY protocol support for Puma](https://github.com/puma/puma/issues/2651) was added in version 5.5.0. When PROXY protocol v1 support is enabled, Puma reads incoming bytes into an internal buffer. It waits for "\r\n" to determine whether a PROXY v1 line is present. | |
| CVE-2026-42507 | Med | 5.3 | < 19.0.1-r2 | 19.0.1-r2 | Jun 2, 2026 | When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged. | |
| CVE-2026-42504 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0 | 0 | Jun 2, 2026 | Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU. | |
| CVE-2026-27145 | Med | 6.5 | < 19.0.1-r2 | 19.0.1-r2 | Jun 2, 2026 | (*x509.Certificate).VerifyHostname previously called matchHostnames in a loop over all DNS Subject Alternative Name (SAN) entries. This caused strings.Split(host, ".") to execute repeatedly on the same input hostname. With a large DNS SAN list, verification costs scaled quadratic | |
| CVE-2026-42506 | Med | 6.1 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering. | |
| CVE-2026-42502 | Med | 6.1 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering. | |
| CVE-2026-39821 | Cri | 9.6 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | The ToASCII and ToUnicode functions incorrectly accept Punycode-encoded labels that decode to an ASCII-only label. For example, ToUnicode("xn--example-.com") incorrectly returns the name "example.com" rather than an error. This behavior can lead to privilege escalation in program | |
| CVE-2026-27136 | Med | 6.1 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering. | |
| CVE-2026-25681 | Med | 6.1 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering. | |
| CVE-2026-25680 | Med | 6.5 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Parsing arbitrary HTML can consume excessive CPU time, possibly leading to denial of service. | |
| CVE-2026-46598 | Med | 5.3 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | For certain crafted inputs, a 'ed25519.PrivateKey' was created by casting malformed wire bytes, leading to a panic when used. | |
| CVE-2026-46597 | Hig | 7.5 | < 19.0.1-r1 | 19.0.1-r1 | May 22, 2026 | An incorrectly placed cast from bytes to int allowed for server-side panic in the AES-GCM packet decoder for well-crafted inputs. | |
| CVE-2026-46595 | Cri | 10.0 | < 0 | 0 | May 22, 2026 | Previously, CVE-2024-45337 fixed an authorization bypass for misused ssh server configurations; if any other type of callback is passed other than public key, then the source-address validation would be skipped. | |
| CVE-2026-42508 | Cri | 9.1 | < 19.0.1-r1 | 19.0.1-r1 | May 22, 2026 | Previously, a revoked 'SignatureKey' belonging to a CA was not correctly checked for revocation. Now, both the 'key' and 'key.SignatureKey' are checked for @revoked. | |
| CVE-2026-39835 | Med | 5.3 | < 19.0.1-r1 | 19.0.1-r1 | May 22, 2026 | SSH servers which use CertChecker as a public key callback without setting IsUserAuthority or IsHostAuthority could be caused to panic by a client presenting a certificate. CertChecker now returns an error instead of panicking when these callbacks are nil. |
- CVE-2026-48038Jun 11, 2026affected < 19.0.3-r1fixed 19.0.3-r1
### Impact Denial of service via untrapped exception in services validating user-supplied JSON / object input with recursive link schemas. The blast radius depends on how the application invokes joi: - Highest impact: `validate()` called without `try/catch` in a request handler
- CVE-2026-47242Jun 9, 2026affected < 19.0.2-r0fixed 19.0.2-r0
### Summary Two `Net::IMAP` commands, `#id` and `#enable`, do not validate their arguments. Arguments to either command could be used by an attacker to inject arbitrary IMAP commands. Please note that passing untrusted inputs to these commands is usually inappropriate and expe
- affected < 19.0.2-r0fixed 19.0.2-r0
### Summary Several Net::IMAP commands accept a raw string argument which is only validated to prevent CRLF injection and then sent verbatim. If this string is derived from user-controlled input, an attacker can force the next command to be absorbed as a continuation of the fir
- CVE-2026-47240Jun 9, 2026affected < 19.0.2-r0fixed 19.0.2-r0
Several Net::IMAP commands accept a "raw data" argument that is sent verbatim after validation to prevent command injection. However, if a server does not support non-synchronizing literals, it may still be possible to inject arbitrary IMAP commands inside non-synchronizing lite
- affected < 19.0.2-r1fixed 19.0.2-r1
### Impact Puma is vulnerable to source IP spoofing when `set_remote_address proxy_protocol: :v1` is enabled and persistent connections are used. PROXY protocol v1 is a connection-level protocol. [Support was added to Puma in v5.5.0](https://github.com/puma/puma/issues/2651). A
- affected < 19.0.2-r1fixed 19.0.2-r1
### Impact [PROXY protocol support for Puma](https://github.com/puma/puma/issues/2651) was added in version 5.5.0. When PROXY protocol v1 support is enabled, Puma reads incoming bytes into an internal buffer. It waits for "\r\n" to determine whether a PROXY v1 line is present.
- affected < 19.0.1-r2fixed 19.0.1-r2
When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.
- affected < 19.0.1-r2fixed 19.0.1-r2
(*x509.Certificate).VerifyHostname previously called matchHostnames in a loop over all DNS Subject Alternative Name (SAN) entries. This caused strings.Split(host, ".") to execute repeatedly on the same input hostname. With a large DNS SAN list, verification costs scaled quadratic
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering.
- affected < 0fixed 0
The ToASCII and ToUnicode functions incorrectly accept Punycode-encoded labels that decode to an ASCII-only label. For example, ToUnicode("xn--example-.com") incorrectly returns the name "example.com" rather than an error. This behavior can lead to privilege escalation in program
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML which is then rendered using Render can result in an unexpected HTML tree. This can be leveraged to execute XSS attacks in applications that attempt to sanitize input HTML before rendering.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Parsing arbitrary HTML can consume excessive CPU time, possibly leading to denial of service.
- affected < 0fixed 0
For certain crafted inputs, a 'ed25519.PrivateKey' was created by casting malformed wire bytes, leading to a panic when used.
- affected < 19.0.1-r1fixed 19.0.1-r1
An incorrectly placed cast from bytes to int allowed for server-side panic in the AES-GCM packet decoder for well-crafted inputs.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Previously, CVE-2024-45337 fixed an authorization bypass for misused ssh server configurations; if any other type of callback is passed other than public key, then the source-address validation would be skipped.
- affected < 19.0.1-r1fixed 19.0.1-r1
Previously, a revoked 'SignatureKey' belonging to a CA was not correctly checked for revocation. Now, both the 'key' and 'key.SignatureKey' are checked for @revoked.
- affected < 19.0.1-r1fixed 19.0.1-r1
SSH servers which use CertChecker as a public key callback without setting IsUserAuthority or IsHostAuthority could be caused to panic by a client presenting a certificate. CertChecker now returns an error instead of panicking when these callbacks are nil.
Page 1 of 3