apk package
chainguard/configmap-reload-fips
pkg:apk/chainguard/configmap-reload-fips
Vulnerabilities (54)
| CVE | Sev | CVSS | KEV | Affected versions | Fixed in | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-32280 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.15.0-r13 | 0.15.0-r13 | Apr 8, 2026 | During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls | |
| CVE-2026-27140 | Hig | 8.8 | < 0.15.0-r13 | 0.15.0-r13 | Apr 8, 2026 | SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass. | |
| CVE-2026-27142 | Med | 6.1 | < 0 | 0 | Mar 6, 2026 | Actions which insert URLs into the content attribute of HTML meta tags are not escaped. This can allow XSS if the meta tag also has an http-equiv attribute with the value "refresh". A new GODEBUG setting has been added, htmlmetacontenturlescape, which can be used to disable escap | |
| CVE-2026-27139 | Low | 2.5 | < 0.15.0-r10 | 0.15.0-r10 | Mar 6, 2026 | On Unix platforms, when listing the contents of a directory using File.ReadDir or File.Readdir the returned FileInfo could reference a file outside of the Root in which the File was opened. The impact of this escape is limited to reading metadata provided by lstat from arbitrary | |
| CVE-2026-25679 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.15.0-r10 | 0.15.0-r10 | Mar 6, 2026 | url.Parse insufficiently validated the host/authority component and accepted some invalid URLs. | |
| CVE-2025-68121 | Cri | 10.0 | < 0.15.0-r9 | 0.15.0-r9 | Feb 5, 2026 | During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and | |
| CVE-2025-61732 | — | < 0.15.0-r9 | 0.15.0-r9 | Feb 5, 2026 | A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary. | ||
| CVE-2025-61727 | — | < 0.15.0-r5 | 0.15.0-r5 | Dec 3, 2025 | An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com. | ||
| CVE-2025-61729 | — | < 0.15.0-r5 | 0.15.0-r5 | Dec 2, 2025 | Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime. Therefore, a certificate provided by a | ||
| CVE-2025-47907 | — | < 0 | 0 | Aug 7, 2025 | Cancelling a query (e.g. by cancelling the context passed to one of the query methods) during a call to the Scan method of the returned Rows can result in unexpected results if other queries are being made in parallel. This can result in a race condition that may overwrite the ex | ||
| CVE-2025-4673 | Med | 6.8 | < 0.15.0-r1 | 0.15.0-r1 | Jun 11, 2025 | Proxy-Authorization and Proxy-Authenticate headers persisted on cross-origin redirects potentially leaking sensitive information. | |
| CVE-2025-22874 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.15.0-r1 | 0.15.0-r1 | Jun 11, 2025 | Calling Verify with a VerifyOptions.KeyUsages that contains ExtKeyUsageAny unintentionally disabledpolicy validation. This only affected certificate chains which contain policy graphs, which are rather uncommon. | |
| CVE-2025-22866 | Med | 4.0 | < 0.14.0-r2 | 0.14.0-r2 | Feb 6, 2025 | Due to the usage of a variable time instruction in the assembly implementation of an internal function, a small number of bits of secret scalars are leaked on the ppc64le architecture. Due to the way this function is used, we do not believe this leakage is enough to allow recover | |
| CVE-2024-45341 | Med | 6.1 | < 0.14.0-r1 | 0.14.0-r1 | Jan 28, 2025 | A certificate with a URI which has a IPv6 address with a zone ID may incorrectly satisfy a URI name constraint that applies to the certificate chain. Certificates containing URIs are not permitted in the web PKI, so this only affects users of private PKIs which make use of URIs. | |
| CVE-2024-45336 | Med | 6.1 | < 0.14.0-r1 | 0.14.0-r1 | Jan 28, 2025 | The HTTP client drops sensitive headers after following a cross-domain redirect. For example, a request to a.com/ containing an Authorization header which is redirected to b.com/ will not send that header to b.com. In the event that the client received a subsequent same-domain re | |
| CVE-2024-34158 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.13.1-r2 | 0.13.1-r2 | Sep 6, 2024 | Calling Parse on a "// +build" build tag line with deeply nested expressions can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. | |
| CVE-2024-34156 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.13.1-r2 | 0.13.1-r2 | Sep 6, 2024 | Calling Decoder.Decode on a message which contains deeply nested structures can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. This is a follow-up to CVE-2022-30635. | |
| CVE-2024-34155 | Med | 4.3 | < 0.13.1-r2 | 0.13.1-r2 | Sep 6, 2024 | Calling any of the Parse functions on Go source code which contains deeply nested literals can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. | |
| CVE-2024-24791 | Hig | 7.5 | < 0.12.0-r9 | 0.12.0-r9 | Jul 2, 2024 | The net/http HTTP/1.1 client mishandled the case where a server responds to a request with an "Expect: 100-continue" header with a non-informational (200 or higher) status. This mishandling could leave a client connection in an invalid state, where the next request sent on the co | |
| CVE-2024-24789 | — | < 0.12.0-r8 | 0.12.0-r8 | Jun 5, 2024 | The archive/zip package's handling of certain types of invalid zip files differs from the behavior of most zip implementations. This misalignment could be exploited to create an zip file with contents that vary depending on the implementation reading the file. The archive/zip pac |
- affected < 0.15.0-r13fixed 0.15.0-r13
During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls
- affected < 0.15.0-r13fixed 0.15.0-r13
SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.
- affected < 0fixed 0
Actions which insert URLs into the content attribute of HTML meta tags are not escaped. This can allow XSS if the meta tag also has an http-equiv attribute with the value "refresh". A new GODEBUG setting has been added, htmlmetacontenturlescape, which can be used to disable escap
- affected < 0.15.0-r10fixed 0.15.0-r10
On Unix platforms, when listing the contents of a directory using File.ReadDir or File.Readdir the returned FileInfo could reference a file outside of the Root in which the File was opened. The impact of this escape is limited to reading metadata provided by lstat from arbitrary
- affected < 0.15.0-r10fixed 0.15.0-r10
url.Parse insufficiently validated the host/authority component and accepted some invalid URLs.
- affected < 0.15.0-r9fixed 0.15.0-r9
During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and
- CVE-2025-61732Feb 5, 2026affected < 0.15.0-r9fixed 0.15.0-r9
A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.
- CVE-2025-61727Dec 3, 2025affected < 0.15.0-r5fixed 0.15.0-r5
An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com.
- CVE-2025-61729Dec 2, 2025affected < 0.15.0-r5fixed 0.15.0-r5
Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime. Therefore, a certificate provided by a
- CVE-2025-47907Aug 7, 2025affected < 0fixed 0
Cancelling a query (e.g. by cancelling the context passed to one of the query methods) during a call to the Scan method of the returned Rows can result in unexpected results if other queries are being made in parallel. This can result in a race condition that may overwrite the ex
- affected < 0.15.0-r1fixed 0.15.0-r1
Proxy-Authorization and Proxy-Authenticate headers persisted on cross-origin redirects potentially leaking sensitive information.
- affected < 0.15.0-r1fixed 0.15.0-r1
Calling Verify with a VerifyOptions.KeyUsages that contains ExtKeyUsageAny unintentionally disabledpolicy validation. This only affected certificate chains which contain policy graphs, which are rather uncommon.
- affected < 0.14.0-r2fixed 0.14.0-r2
Due to the usage of a variable time instruction in the assembly implementation of an internal function, a small number of bits of secret scalars are leaked on the ppc64le architecture. Due to the way this function is used, we do not believe this leakage is enough to allow recover
- affected < 0.14.0-r1fixed 0.14.0-r1
A certificate with a URI which has a IPv6 address with a zone ID may incorrectly satisfy a URI name constraint that applies to the certificate chain. Certificates containing URIs are not permitted in the web PKI, so this only affects users of private PKIs which make use of URIs.
- affected < 0.14.0-r1fixed 0.14.0-r1
The HTTP client drops sensitive headers after following a cross-domain redirect. For example, a request to a.com/ containing an Authorization header which is redirected to b.com/ will not send that header to b.com. In the event that the client received a subsequent same-domain re
- affected < 0.13.1-r2fixed 0.13.1-r2
Calling Parse on a "// +build" build tag line with deeply nested expressions can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion.
- affected < 0.13.1-r2fixed 0.13.1-r2
Calling Decoder.Decode on a message which contains deeply nested structures can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. This is a follow-up to CVE-2022-30635.
- affected < 0.13.1-r2fixed 0.13.1-r2
Calling any of the Parse functions on Go source code which contains deeply nested literals can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion.
- affected < 0.12.0-r9fixed 0.12.0-r9
The net/http HTTP/1.1 client mishandled the case where a server responds to a request with an "Expect: 100-continue" header with a non-informational (200 or higher) status. This mishandling could leave a client connection in an invalid state, where the next request sent on the co
- CVE-2024-24789Jun 5, 2024affected < 0.12.0-r8fixed 0.12.0-r8
The archive/zip package's handling of certain types of invalid zip files differs from the behavior of most zip implementations. This misalignment could be exploited to create an zip file with contents that vary depending on the implementation reading the file. The archive/zip pac
Page 2 of 3