VYPR

apk package

chainguard/aws-network-policy-agent

pkg:apk/chainguard/aws-network-policy-agent

Vulnerabilities (26)

  • CVE-2026-33814HigMay 7, 2026
    affected < 1.3.4-r2fixed 1.3.4-r2

    When processing HTTP/2 SETTINGS frames, transport will enter an infinite loop of writing CONTINUATION frames if it receives a SETTINGS_MAX_FRAME_SIZE with a value of 0.

  • CVE-2026-33810HigApr 8, 2026
    affected < 1.3.2-r2fixed 1.3.2-r2

    When verifying a certificate chain containing excluded DNS constraints, these constraints are not correctly applied to wildcard DNS SANs which use a different case than the constraint. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in th

  • CVE-2026-32289MedApr 8, 2026
    affected < 0fixed 0

    Context was not properly tracked across template branches for JS template literals, leading to possibly incorrect escaping of content when branches were used. Additionally template actions within JS template literals did not properly track the brace depth, leading to incorrect es

  • CVE-2026-32288MedApr 8, 2026
    affected < 0fixed 0

    tar.Reader can allocate an unbounded amount of memory when reading a maliciously-crafted archive containing a large number of sparse regions encoded in the "old GNU sparse map" format.

  • CVE-2026-32283HigApr 8, 2026
    affected < 1.3.2-r2fixed 1.3.2-r2

    If one side of the TLS connection sends multiple key update messages post-handshake in a single record, the connection can deadlock, causing uncontrolled consumption of resources. This can lead to a denial of service. This only affects TLS 1.3.

  • CVE-2026-32282MedApr 8, 2026
    affected < 0fixed 0

    On Linux, if the target of Root.Chmod is replaced with a symlink while the chmod operation is in progress, Chmod can operate on the target of the symlink, even when the target lies outside the root. The Linux fchmodat syscall silently ignores the AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW flag, which R

  • CVE-2026-32281HigApr 8, 2026
    affected < 1.3.2-r2fixed 1.3.2-r2

    Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C

  • CVE-2026-32280HigApr 8, 2026
    affected < 1.3.2-r2fixed 1.3.2-r2

    During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls

  • CVE-2026-27140HigApr 8, 2026
    affected < 1.3.2-r2fixed 1.3.2-r2

    SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.

  • CVE-2026-33186CriMar 20, 2026
    affected < 1.3.1-r4fixed 1.3.1-r4

    gRPC-Go is the Go language implementation of gRPC. Versions prior to 1.79.3 have an authorization bypass resulting from improper input validation of the HTTP/2 `:path` pseudo-header. The gRPC-Go server was too lenient in its routing logic, accepting requests where the `:path` omi

  • CVE-2025-68121CriFeb 5, 2026
    affected < 1.3.1-r2fixed 1.3.1-r2

    During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and

  • CVE-2025-61732Feb 5, 2026
    affected < 1.3.1-r2fixed 1.3.1-r2

    A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.

  • CVE-2025-47907Aug 7, 2025
    affected < 1.2.3-r3fixed 1.2.3-r3

    Cancelling a query (e.g. by cancelling the context passed to one of the query methods) during a call to the Scan method of the returned Rows can result in unexpected results if other queries are being made in parallel. This can result in a race condition that may overwrite the ex

  • CVE-2025-22872MedApr 16, 2025
    affected < 1.2.0-r3fixed 1.2.0-r3

    The tokenizer incorrectly interprets tags with unquoted attribute values that end with a solidus character (/) as self-closing. When directly using Tokenizer, this can result in such tags incorrectly being marked as self-closing, and when using the Parse functions, this can resul

  • CVE-2025-22871CriApr 8, 2025
    affected < 1.2.0-r2fixed 1.2.0-r2

    The net/http package improperly accepts a bare LF as a line terminator in chunked data chunk-size lines. This can permit request smuggling if a net/http server is used in conjunction with a server that incorrectly accepts a bare LF as part of a chunk-ext.

  • CVE-2025-22870MedMar 12, 2025
    affected < 1.2.0-r1fixed 1.2.0-r1

    Matching of hosts against proxy patterns can improperly treat an IPv6 zone ID as a hostname component. For example, when the NO_PROXY environment variable is set to "*.example.com", a request to "[::1%25.example.com]:80` will incorrectly match and not be proxied.

  • CVE-2025-22868Feb 26, 2025
    affected < 1.1.6-r3fixed 1.1.6-r3

    An attacker can pass a malicious malformed token which causes unexpected memory to be consumed during parsing.

  • CVE-2025-22866MedFeb 6, 2025
    affected < 1.1.6-r2fixed 1.1.6-r2

    Due to the usage of a variable time instruction in the assembly implementation of an internal function, a small number of bits of secret scalars are leaked on the ppc64le architecture. Due to the way this function is used, we do not believe this leakage is enough to allow recover

  • CVE-2024-45341MedJan 28, 2025
    affected < 1.1.6-r1fixed 1.1.6-r1

    A certificate with a URI which has a IPv6 address with a zone ID may incorrectly satisfy a URI name constraint that applies to the certificate chain. Certificates containing URIs are not permitted in the web PKI, so this only affects users of private PKIs which make use of URIs.

  • CVE-2024-45336MedJan 28, 2025
    affected < 1.1.6-r1fixed 1.1.6-r1

    The HTTP client drops sensitive headers after following a cross-domain redirect. For example, a request to a.com/ containing an Authorization header which is redirected to b.com/ will not send that header to b.com. In the event that the client received a subsequent same-domain re

Page 1 of 2