VYPR

apk package

chainguard/aws-load-balancer-controller-fips

pkg:apk/chainguard/aws-load-balancer-controller-fips

Vulnerabilities (61)

  • CVE-2026-32281HigApr 8, 2026
    affected < 3.2.1-r0fixed 3.2.1-r0

    Validating certificate chains which use policies is unexpectedly inefficient when certificates in the chain contain a very large number of policy mappings, possibly causing denial of service. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root C

  • CVE-2026-32280HigApr 8, 2026
    affected < 3.2.1-r0fixed 3.2.1-r0

    During chain building, the amount of work that is done is not correctly limited when a large number of intermediate certificates are passed in VerifyOptions.Intermediates, which can lead to a denial of service. This affects both direct users of crypto/x509 and users of crypto/tls

  • CVE-2026-27140HigApr 8, 2026
    affected < 3.2.1-r0fixed 3.2.1-r0

    SWIG file names containing 'cgo' and well-crafted payloads could lead to code smuggling and arbitrary code execution at build time due to trust layer bypass.

  • CVE-2026-27142MedMar 6, 2026
    affected < 0fixed 0

    Actions which insert URLs into the content attribute of HTML meta tags are not escaped. This can allow XSS if the meta tag also has an http-equiv attribute with the value "refresh". A new GODEBUG setting has been added, htmlmetacontenturlescape, which can be used to disable escap

  • CVE-2026-27139LowMar 6, 2026
    affected < 3.1.0-r1fixed 3.1.0-r1

    On Unix platforms, when listing the contents of a directory using File.ReadDir or File.Readdir the returned FileInfo could reference a file outside of the Root in which the File was opened. The impact of this escape is limited to reading metadata provided by lstat from arbitrary

  • CVE-2026-27138MedMar 6, 2026
    affected < 3.1.0-r1fixed 3.1.0-r1

    Certificate verification can panic when a certificate in the chain has an empty DNS name and another certificate in the chain has excluded name constraints. This can crash programs that are either directly verifying X.509 certificate chains, or those that use TLS.

  • CVE-2026-27137HigMar 6, 2026
    affected < 3.1.0-r1fixed 3.1.0-r1

    When verifying a certificate chain which contains a certificate containing multiple email address constraints which share common local portions but different domain portions, these constraints will not be properly applied, and only the last constraint will be considered.

  • CVE-2026-25679HigMar 6, 2026
    affected < 3.1.0-r1fixed 3.1.0-r1

    url.Parse insufficiently validated the host/authority component and accepted some invalid URLs.

  • CVE-2025-68121CriFeb 5, 2026
    affected < 3.0.0-r2fixed 3.0.0-r2

    During session resumption in crypto/tls, if the underlying Config has its ClientCAs or RootCAs fields mutated between the initial handshake and the resumed handshake, the resumed handshake may succeed when it should have failed. This may happen when a user calls Config.Clone and

  • CVE-2025-58190Feb 5, 2026
    affected < 0fixed 0

    The html.Parse function in golang.org/x/net/html has an infinite parsing loop when processing certain inputs, which can lead to denial of service (DoS) if an attacker provides specially crafted HTML content.

  • CVE-2025-47911Feb 5, 2026
    affected < 0fixed 0

    The html.Parse function in golang.org/x/net/html has quadratic parsing complexity when processing certain inputs, which can lead to denial of service (DoS) if an attacker provides specially crafted HTML content.

  • CVE-2025-61732Feb 5, 2026
    affected < 3.0.0-r2fixed 3.0.0-r2

    A discrepancy between how Go and C/C++ comments were parsed allowed for code smuggling into the resulting cgo binary.

  • CVE-2025-61727MedDec 3, 2025
    affected < 2.16.0-r2fixed 2.16.0-r2

    An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com.

  • CVE-2025-61729HigDec 2, 2025
    affected < 2.16.0-r2fixed 2.16.0-r2

    Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out. Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime. Therefore, a certificate provided by a

  • CVE-2025-47907HigAug 7, 2025
    affected < 2.13.4-r1fixed 2.13.4-r1

    Cancelling a query (e.g. by cancelling the context passed to one of the query methods) during a call to the Scan method of the returned Rows can result in unexpected results if other queries are being made in parallel. This can result in a race condition that may overwrite the ex

  • CVE-2025-4673MedJun 11, 2025
    affected < 2.13.2-r2fixed 2.13.2-r2

    Proxy-Authorization and Proxy-Authenticate headers persisted on cross-origin redirects potentially leaking sensitive information.

  • CVE-2025-22874HigJun 11, 2025
    affected < 2.13.2-r2fixed 2.13.2-r2

    Calling Verify with a VerifyOptions.KeyUsages that contains ExtKeyUsageAny unintentionally disabledpolicy validation. This only affected certificate chains which contain policy graphs, which are rather uncommon.

  • CVE-2025-22872MedApr 16, 2025
    affected < 2.12.0-r3fixed 2.12.0-r3

    The tokenizer incorrectly interprets tags with unquoted attribute values that end with a solidus character (/) as self-closing. When directly using Tokenizer, this can result in such tags incorrectly being marked as self-closing, and when using the Parse functions, this can resul

  • CVE-2025-22870MedMar 12, 2025
    affected < 2.12.0-r1fixed 2.12.0-r1

    Matching of hosts against proxy patterns can improperly treat an IPv6 zone ID as a hostname component. For example, when the NO_PROXY environment variable is set to "*.example.com", a request to "[::1%25.example.com]:80` will incorrectly match and not be proxied.

  • CVE-2025-22866MedFeb 6, 2025
    affected < 2.11.0-r3fixed 2.11.0-r3

    Due to the usage of a variable time instruction in the assembly implementation of an internal function, a small number of bits of secret scalars are leaked on the ppc64le architecture. Due to the way this function is used, we do not believe this leakage is enough to allow recover