VYPR

CWE-693

Protection Mechanism Failure

PillarDraft

Description

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product.

This weakness covers three distinct situations. A "missing" protection mechanism occurs when the application does not define any mechanism against a certain class of attack. An "insufficient" protection mechanism might provide some defenses - for example, against the most common attacks - but it does not protect against everything that is intended. Finally, an "ignored" mechanism occurs when a mechanism is available and in active use within the product, but the developer has not applied it in some code path.

Hierarchy (View 1000)

Related attack patterns (CAPEC)

CAPEC-1 · CAPEC-107 · CAPEC-127 · CAPEC-17 · CAPEC-20 · CAPEC-22 · CAPEC-237 · CAPEC-36 · CAPEC-477 · CAPEC-480 · CAPEC-51 · CAPEC-57 · CAPEC-59 · CAPEC-65 · CAPEC-668 · CAPEC-74 · CAPEC-87

CVEs mapped to this weakness (771)

page 12 of 39
  • CVE-2026-7913HigMay 6, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    Insufficient policy enforcement in DevTools in Google Chrome on Android prior to 148.0.7778.96 allowed a local attacker to perform privilege escalation via a malicious file. (Chromium security severity: High)

  • CVE-2025-48653HigMar 2, 2026
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In loadDataAndPostValue of multiple files, there is a possible way to obscure permission usage due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-46291HigDec 17, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    A logic issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Tahoe 26.2. An app may bypass Gatekeeper checks.

  • CVE-2025-67460HigDec 10, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    Protection Mechanism Failure of Software Downgrade in Zoom Rooms for Windows before 6.6.0 may allow an unauthenticated user to conduct an escalation of privilege via local access.

  • CVE-2025-26439HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In getComponentName of AccessibilitySettingsUtils.java, there is a possible way to for a malicious Talkback service to be enabled instead of the system component due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution…

  • CVE-2025-26431HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In setupAccessibilityServices of AccessibilityFragment.java, there is a possible way to hide an enabled accessibility service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is…

  • CVE-2025-48546HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In checkPermissions of SafeActivityOptions.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-48531HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In getCallingPackageName of CredentialStorage, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-48522HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In setDisplayName of AssociationRequest.java, there is a possible way for an app to retain CDM association due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…

  • CVE-2025-32331HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In showDismissibleKeyguard of KeyguardService.java, there is a possible way to bypass app pinning due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-26464HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In executeAppFunction of AppSearchManagerService.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…

  • CVE-2025-0089HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In multiple locations, there is a possible way to hijack the Launcher app due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-26458HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In multiple functions of LocationProviderManager.java, there is a possible background activity launch due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for…

  • CVE-2025-26444HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In onHandleForceStop of VoiceInteractionManagerService.java, there is a bug that could cause the system to incorrectly revert to the default assistant application when a user-selected assistant is forcibly stopped due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local…

  • CVE-2025-36905HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In gxp_mapping_create of gxp_mapping.c, there is a possible privilege escalation due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-36898HigSep 4, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    There is a possible escalation of privilege due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-22437HigSep 2, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In setMediaButtonReceiver of multiple files, there is a possible way to launch arbitrary activities from background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed…

  • CVE-2025-22434HigSep 2, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In handleKeyGestureEvent of PhoneWindowManager.java, there is a possible lock screen bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

  • CVE-2025-22433HigSep 2, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In canForward of IntentForwarderActivity.java, there is a possible bypass of the cross profile intent filter most commonly used in Work Profile scenarios due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges…

  • CVE-2024-49720HigSep 2, 2025
    risk 0.51cvss 7.8epss 0.00

    In multiple functions of Permissions.java, there is a possible way to override the state of the user's location permissions due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not…