| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-8118 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8117 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8116 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8115 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8114 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8113 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8112 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8111 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8110 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8109 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8108 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8107 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8049 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8048 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8047 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8046 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8045 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8044 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8043 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8042 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8041 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8040 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8028 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8015 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8014 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8013 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8004 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8003 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2016-8001 | — | 0.00 | — | — | Mar 2, 2021 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none | ||
| CVE-2021-27884 | Med | 0.33 | 5.1 | 0.00 | Mar 1, 2021 | Weak JSON Web Token (JWT) signing secret generation in YMFE YApi through 1.9.2 allows recreation of other users' JWT tokens. This occurs because Math.random in Node.js is used. | ||
| CVE-2021-3342 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.04 | Mar 1, 2021 | EPrints 3.4.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files and possibly execute commands via crafted LaTeX input to a cgi/latex2png?latex= URI. | ||
| CVE-2021-27878 | Hig | 0.80 | 8.8 | 0.24 | KEV | Mar 1, 2021 | An issue was discovered in Veritas Backup Exec before 21.2. The communication between a client and an Agent requires successful authentication, which is typically completed over a secure TLS communication. However, due to a vulnerability in the SHA Authentication scheme, an… | |
| CVE-2021-27877 | Hig | 0.79 | 8.2 | 0.65 | KEV | Mar 1, 2021 | An issue was discovered in Veritas Backup Exec before 21.2. It supports multiple authentication schemes: SHA authentication is one of these. This authentication scheme is no longer used in current versions of the product, but hadn't yet been disabled. An attacker could remotely… | |
| CVE-2021-27876 | Hig | 0.75 | 8.1 | 0.14 | KEV | Mar 1, 2021 | An issue was discovered in Veritas Backup Exec before 21.2. The communication between a client and an Agent requires successful authentication, which is typically completed over a secure TLS communication. However, due to a vulnerability in the SHA Authentication scheme, an… | |
| CVE-2021-26704 | Hig | 0.57 | 8.8 | 0.03 | Mar 1, 2021 | EPrints 3.4.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via crafted input to the verb parameter in a cgi/toolbox/toolbox URI. | ||
| CVE-2021-26703 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.04 | Mar 1, 2021 | EPrints 3.4.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files and possibly execute commands via crafted JSON/XML input to a cgi/ajax/phrase URI. | ||
| CVE-2021-26702 | Med | 0.40 | 6.1 | 0.03 | Mar 1, 2021 | EPrints 3.4.2 exposes a reflected XSS opportunity in the dataset parameter to the cgi/dataset_dictionary URI. | ||
| CVE-2021-26476 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.03 | Mar 1, 2021 | EPrints 3.4.2 allows remote attackers to execute OS commands via crafted LaTeX input to a cgi/cal?year= URI. | ||
| CVE-2021-26475 | Med | 0.40 | 6.1 | 0.07 | Mar 1, 2021 | EPrints 3.4.2 exposes a reflected XSS opportunity in the via a cgi/cal URI. | ||
| CVE-2021-3332 | Med | 0.35 | 5.3 | 0.02 | Mar 1, 2021 | WPS Hide Login 1.6.1 allows remote attackers to bypass a protection mechanism via post_password. | ||
| CVE-2021-27318 | Med | 0.40 | 6.1 | 0.01 | Mar 1, 2021 | Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in contactus.php in Doctor Appointment System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the lastname parameter. | ||
| CVE-2021-27317 | Med | 0.40 | 6.1 | 0.01 | Mar 1, 2021 | Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in contactus.php in Doctor Appointment System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the comment parameter. | ||
| CVE-2021-21517 | Hig | 0.47 | 7.2 | 0.01 | Mar 1, 2021 | SRS Policy Manager 6.X is affected by an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) vulnerability due to a misconfigured XML parser that processes user-supplied DTD input without sufficient validation. A remote unauthenticated attacker can potentially exploit this vulnerability to read… | ||
| CVE-2021-21515 | Cri | 0.59 | 9.0 | 0.01 | Mar 1, 2021 | Dell EMC SourceOne, versions 7.2SP10 and prior, contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability. A remote low privileged attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability, to hijack user sessions or to trick a victim application user to unknowingly send arbitrary requests… | ||
| CVE-2021-25914 | Cri | 0.57 | 9.8 | 0.04 | Mar 1, 2021 | Prototype pollution vulnerability in 'object-collider' versions 1.0.0 through 1.0.3 allows attacker to cause a denial of service and may lead to remote code execution. | ||
| CVE-2021-22114 | Med | 0.35 | 5.3 | 0.01 | Mar 1, 2021 | Addresses partial fix in CVE-2018-1263. Spring-integration-zip, versions prior to 1.0.4, exposes an arbitrary file write vulnerability, that can be achieved using a specially crafted zip archive (affects other archives as well, bzip2, tar, xz, war, cpio, 7z), that holds path… | ||
| CVE-2020-36240 | Med | 0.35 | 5.3 | 0.01 | Mar 1, 2021 | The ResourceDownloadRewriteRule class in Crowd before version 4.0.4, and from version 4.1.0 before 4.1.2 allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files within WEB-INF and META-INF directories via an incorrect path access check. | ||
| CVE-2018-25004 | Med | 0.32 | 4.9 | 0.01 | Mar 1, 2021 | A user authorized to performing a specific type of query may trigger a denial of service by issuing a generic explain command on a find query. This issue affects MongoDB Server v4.0 versions prior to 4.0.6 and MongoDB Server v3.6 versions prior to 3.6.11. | ||
| CVE-2021-25833 | Cri | 0.67 | 9.8 | 0.44 | Mar 1, 2021 | A file extension handling issue was found in [server] module of ONLYOFFICE DocumentServer v4.2.0.71-v5.6.0.21. The file extension is controlled by an attacker through the request data and leads to arbitrary file overwriting. Using this vulnerability, a remote attacker can obtain… | ||
| CVE-2021-25832 | Cri | 0.65 | 9.8 | 0.13 | Mar 1, 2021 | A heap buffer overflow vulnerability inside of BMP image processing was found at [core] module of ONLYOFFICE DocumentServer v4.0.0-9-v6.0.0. Using this vulnerability, an attacker is able to gain remote code executions on DocumentServer. |
- CVE-2016-8118Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8117Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8116Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8115Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8114Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8113Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8112Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8111Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8110Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8109Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8108Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8107Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8049Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8048Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8047Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8046Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8045Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8044Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8043Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8042Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8041Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8040Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8028Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8015Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8014Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8013Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8004Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8003Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- CVE-2016-8001Mar 2, 2021risk 0.00cvss —epss —
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none
- risk 0.33cvss 5.1epss 0.00
Weak JSON Web Token (JWT) signing secret generation in YMFE YApi through 1.9.2 allows recreation of other users' JWT tokens. This occurs because Math.random in Node.js is used.
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.04
EPrints 3.4.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files and possibly execute commands via crafted LaTeX input to a cgi/latex2png?latex= URI.
- risk 0.80cvss 8.8epss 0.24
An issue was discovered in Veritas Backup Exec before 21.2. The communication between a client and an Agent requires successful authentication, which is typically completed over a secure TLS communication. However, due to a vulnerability in the SHA Authentication scheme, an…
- risk 0.79cvss 8.2epss 0.65
An issue was discovered in Veritas Backup Exec before 21.2. It supports multiple authentication schemes: SHA authentication is one of these. This authentication scheme is no longer used in current versions of the product, but hadn't yet been disabled. An attacker could remotely…
- risk 0.75cvss 8.1epss 0.14
An issue was discovered in Veritas Backup Exec before 21.2. The communication between a client and an Agent requires successful authentication, which is typically completed over a secure TLS communication. However, due to a vulnerability in the SHA Authentication scheme, an…
- risk 0.57cvss 8.8epss 0.03
EPrints 3.4.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via crafted input to the verb parameter in a cgi/toolbox/toolbox URI.
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.04
EPrints 3.4.2 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files and possibly execute commands via crafted JSON/XML input to a cgi/ajax/phrase URI.
- risk 0.40cvss 6.1epss 0.03
EPrints 3.4.2 exposes a reflected XSS opportunity in the dataset parameter to the cgi/dataset_dictionary URI.
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.03
EPrints 3.4.2 allows remote attackers to execute OS commands via crafted LaTeX input to a cgi/cal?year= URI.
- risk 0.40cvss 6.1epss 0.07
EPrints 3.4.2 exposes a reflected XSS opportunity in the via a cgi/cal URI.
- risk 0.35cvss 5.3epss 0.02
WPS Hide Login 1.6.1 allows remote attackers to bypass a protection mechanism via post_password.
- risk 0.40cvss 6.1epss 0.01
Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in contactus.php in Doctor Appointment System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the lastname parameter.
- risk 0.40cvss 6.1epss 0.01
Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in contactus.php in Doctor Appointment System 1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the comment parameter.
- risk 0.47cvss 7.2epss 0.01
SRS Policy Manager 6.X is affected by an XML External Entity Injection (XXE) vulnerability due to a misconfigured XML parser that processes user-supplied DTD input without sufficient validation. A remote unauthenticated attacker can potentially exploit this vulnerability to read…
- risk 0.59cvss 9.0epss 0.01
Dell EMC SourceOne, versions 7.2SP10 and prior, contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability. A remote low privileged attacker may potentially exploit this vulnerability, to hijack user sessions or to trick a victim application user to unknowingly send arbitrary requests…
- risk 0.57cvss 9.8epss 0.04
Prototype pollution vulnerability in 'object-collider' versions 1.0.0 through 1.0.3 allows attacker to cause a denial of service and may lead to remote code execution.
- risk 0.35cvss 5.3epss 0.01
Addresses partial fix in CVE-2018-1263. Spring-integration-zip, versions prior to 1.0.4, exposes an arbitrary file write vulnerability, that can be achieved using a specially crafted zip archive (affects other archives as well, bzip2, tar, xz, war, cpio, 7z), that holds path…
- risk 0.35cvss 5.3epss 0.01
The ResourceDownloadRewriteRule class in Crowd before version 4.0.4, and from version 4.1.0 before 4.1.2 allowed unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files within WEB-INF and META-INF directories via an incorrect path access check.
- risk 0.32cvss 4.9epss 0.01
A user authorized to performing a specific type of query may trigger a denial of service by issuing a generic explain command on a find query. This issue affects MongoDB Server v4.0 versions prior to 4.0.6 and MongoDB Server v3.6 versions prior to 3.6.11.
- risk 0.67cvss 9.8epss 0.44
A file extension handling issue was found in [server] module of ONLYOFFICE DocumentServer v4.2.0.71-v5.6.0.21. The file extension is controlled by an attacker through the request data and leads to arbitrary file overwriting. Using this vulnerability, a remote attacker can obtain…
- risk 0.65cvss 9.8epss 0.13
A heap buffer overflow vulnerability inside of BMP image processing was found at [core] module of ONLYOFFICE DocumentServer v4.0.0-9-v6.0.0. Using this vulnerability, an attacker is able to gain remote code executions on DocumentServer.