VYPR
High severityNVD Advisory· Published Mar 21, 2025· Updated Mar 24, 2025

CVE-2024-53351

CVE-2024-53351

Description

Insecure permissions in PipeCD v0.49 allow attackers to steal the service account token, leading to Kubernetes cluster compromise.

AI Insight

LLM-synthesized narrative grounded in this CVE's description and references.

Insecure permissions in PipeCD v0.49 allow attackers to steal the service account token, leading to Kubernetes cluster compromise.

CVE-2024-53351 describes an insecure permission vulnerability in PipeCD v0.49 that allows attackers to access the service account's token [1][4]. This issue stems from improper access controls within the PipeCD components, enabling unauthorized token retrieval.

An attacker who compromises a worker node can exploit this by forcing a PipeCD pod with excessive permissions to run on that node, then extracting the service account token [4]. The token can be used to authenticate with the Kubernetes API server, bypassing normal authorization checks.

With the stolen token, an attacker can compromise all Secrets in the cluster and escalate privileges to potentially take over the entire Kubernetes cluster [4]. This represents a critical risk to environments using PipeCD for continuous delivery.

No official patch has been released as of the publication date, but PipeCD is actively maintained [2][3]. Users should review their RBAC configurations and consider upgrading to a fixed version when available.

AI Insight generated on May 20, 2026. Synthesized from this CVE's description and the cited reference URLs; citations are validated against the source bundle.

Affected packages

Versions sourced from the GitHub Security Advisory.

PackageAffected versionsPatched versions
github.com/pipe-cd/pipecdGo
<= 0.49.0

Affected products

2

Patches

0

No patches discovered yet.

Vulnerability mechanics

No source-code context for this CVE — mechanics is only generated when we can read the actual fix diff. Without that, the four sections (root cause, attack vector, affected code, fix) would be speculation rather than analysis.

References

5

News mentions

0

No linked articles in our index yet.