Vendor CVEs
Dropbear SSH Project
All CVEs
22 total · sorted by risk| CVE | Vendor / Product | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-7406 | Cri | 0.65 | 9.8 | 0.10 | Mar 3, 2017 | Format string vulnerability in Dropbear SSH before 2016.74 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the (1) username or (2) host argument. | ||
| CVE-2016-7407 | Cri | 0.64 | 9.8 | 0.06 | Mar 3, 2017 | The dropbearconvert command in Dropbear SSH before 2016.74 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted OpenSSH key file. | ||
| CVE-2017-9078 | Hig | 0.58 | 8.8 | 0.05 | May 19, 2017 | The server in Dropbear before 2017.75 might allow post-authentication root remote code execution because of a double free in cleanup of TCP listeners when the -a option is enabled. | ||
| CVE-2016-7408 | Hig | 0.58 | 8.8 | 0.04 | Mar 3, 2017 | The dbclient in Dropbear SSH before 2016.74 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) -m or (2) -c argument. | ||
| CVE-2020-36254 | Hig | 0.46 | 8.1 | 0.02 | Feb 25, 2021 | scp.c in Dropbear before 2020.79 mishandles the filename of . or an empty filename, a related issue to CVE-2018-20685. | ||
| CVE-2023-48795 | Med | 0.39 | 5.9 | 0.93 | Dec 18, 2023 | The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently… | ||
| CVE-2016-3116 | Med | 0.39 | 6.4 | 0.19 | Mar 22, 2016 | CRLF injection vulnerability in Dropbear SSH before 2016.72 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended shell-command restrictions via crafted X11 forwarding data. | ||
| CVE-2016-7409 | Med | 0.36 | 5.5 | 0.00 | Mar 3, 2017 | The dbclient and server in Dropbear SSH before 2016.74, when compiled with DEBUG_TRACE, allows local users to read process memory via the -v argument, related to a failed remote ident. | ||
| CVE-2019-12953 | Med | 0.35 | 5.3 | 0.01 | Dec 30, 2020 | Dropbear 2011.54 through 2018.76 has an inconsistent failure delay that may lead to revealing valid usernames, a different issue than CVE-2018-15599. | ||
| CVE-2017-2659 | Med | 0.35 | 5.3 | 0.02 | Mar 21, 2019 | It was found that dropbear before version 2013.59 with GSSAPI leaks whether given username is valid or invalid. When an invalid username is given, the GSSAPI authentication failure was incorrectly counted towards the maximum allowed number of password attempts. | ||
| CVE-2018-15599 | Med | 0.35 | 5.3 | 0.03 | Aug 21, 2018 | The recv_msg_userauth_request function in svr-auth.c in Dropbear through 2018.76 is prone to a user enumeration vulnerability because username validity affects how fields in SSH_MSG_USERAUTH messages are handled, a similar issue to CVE-2018-15473 in an unrelated codebase. | ||
| CVE-2017-9079 | Med | 0.31 | 4.7 | 0.00 | May 19, 2017 | Dropbear before 2017.75 might allow local users to read certain files as root, if the file has the authorized_keys file format with a command= option. This occurs because ~/.ssh/authorized_keys is read with root privileges and symlinks are followed. | ||
| CVE-2025-14282 | Med | 0.28 | 5.4 | 0.00 | Feb 12, 2026 | A flaw was found in Dropbear. When running in multi-user mode and authenticating users, the dropbear ssh server does the socket forwardings requested by the remote client as root, only switching to the logged-in user upon spawning a shell or performing some operations like… | ||
| CVE-2025-47203 | Med | 0.22 | 4.5 | 0.01 | May 7, 2025 | dbclient in Dropbear SSH before 2025.88 allows command injection via an untrusted hostname argument, because a shell is used. | ||
| CVE-2006-1206 | 0.04 | — | 0.12 | Mar 14, 2006 | Matt Johnston Dropbear SSH server 0.47 and earlier, as used in embedded Linux devices and on general-purpose operating systems, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection slot exhaustion) via a large number of connection attempts that exceeds the… | |||
| CVE-2013-4421 | 0.01 | — | 0.06 | Oct 25, 2013 | The buf_decompress function in packet.c in Dropbear SSH Server before 2013.59 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a compressed packet that has a large size when it is decompressed. | |||
| CVE-2012-0920 | 0.01 | — | 0.06 | Jun 5, 2012 | Use-after-free vulnerability in Dropbear SSH Server 0.52 through 2012.54, when command restriction and public key authentication are enabled, allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code and bypass command restrictions via multiple crafted command requests,… | |||
| CVE-2021-36369 | Hig | 0.00 | 7.5 | 0.01 | Oct 12, 2022 | An issue was discovered in Dropbear through 2020.81. Due to a non-RFC-compliant check of the available authentication methods in the client-side SSH code, it is possible for an SSH server to change the login process in its favor. This attack can bypass additional security… | ||
| CVE-2013-4434 | 0.00 | — | 0.06 | Oct 25, 2013 | Dropbear SSH Server before 2013.59 generates error messages for a failed logon attempt with different time delays depending on whether the user account exists, which allows remote attackers to discover valid usernames. | |||
| CVE-2007-1099 | 0.00 | — | 0.02 | Feb 26, 2007 | dbclient in Dropbear SSH client before 0.49 does not sufficiently warn the user when it detects a hostkey mismatch, which might allow remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks. | |||
| CVE-2005-4178 | 0.00 | — | 0.03 | Dec 12, 2005 | Buffer overflow in Dropbear server before 0.47 allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified inputs that cause insufficient memory to be allocated due to an incorrect expression that does not enforce the proper order of operations. | |||
| CVE-2004-2486 | 0.00 | — | 0.03 | Dec 31, 2004 | The DSS verification code in Dropbear SSH Server before 0.43 frees uninitialized variables, which might allow remote attackers to gain access. |
- risk 0.65cvss 9.8epss 0.10
Format string vulnerability in Dropbear SSH before 2016.74 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the (1) username or (2) host argument.
- risk 0.64cvss 9.8epss 0.06
The dropbearconvert command in Dropbear SSH before 2016.74 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted OpenSSH key file.
- risk 0.58cvss 8.8epss 0.05
The server in Dropbear before 2017.75 might allow post-authentication root remote code execution because of a double free in cleanup of TCP listeners when the -a option is enabled.
- risk 0.58cvss 8.8epss 0.04
The dbclient in Dropbear SSH before 2016.74 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) -m or (2) -c argument.
- risk 0.46cvss 8.1epss 0.02
scp.c in Dropbear before 2020.79 mishandles the filename of . or an empty filename, a related issue to CVE-2018-20685.
- risk 0.39cvss 5.9epss 0.93
The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently…
- risk 0.39cvss 6.4epss 0.19
CRLF injection vulnerability in Dropbear SSH before 2016.72 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended shell-command restrictions via crafted X11 forwarding data.
- risk 0.36cvss 5.5epss 0.00
The dbclient and server in Dropbear SSH before 2016.74, when compiled with DEBUG_TRACE, allows local users to read process memory via the -v argument, related to a failed remote ident.
- risk 0.35cvss 5.3epss 0.01
Dropbear 2011.54 through 2018.76 has an inconsistent failure delay that may lead to revealing valid usernames, a different issue than CVE-2018-15599.
- risk 0.35cvss 5.3epss 0.02
It was found that dropbear before version 2013.59 with GSSAPI leaks whether given username is valid or invalid. When an invalid username is given, the GSSAPI authentication failure was incorrectly counted towards the maximum allowed number of password attempts.
- risk 0.35cvss 5.3epss 0.03
The recv_msg_userauth_request function in svr-auth.c in Dropbear through 2018.76 is prone to a user enumeration vulnerability because username validity affects how fields in SSH_MSG_USERAUTH messages are handled, a similar issue to CVE-2018-15473 in an unrelated codebase.
- risk 0.31cvss 4.7epss 0.00
Dropbear before 2017.75 might allow local users to read certain files as root, if the file has the authorized_keys file format with a command= option. This occurs because ~/.ssh/authorized_keys is read with root privileges and symlinks are followed.
- risk 0.28cvss 5.4epss 0.00
A flaw was found in Dropbear. When running in multi-user mode and authenticating users, the dropbear ssh server does the socket forwardings requested by the remote client as root, only switching to the logged-in user upon spawning a shell or performing some operations like…
- risk 0.22cvss 4.5epss 0.01
dbclient in Dropbear SSH before 2025.88 allows command injection via an untrusted hostname argument, because a shell is used.
- CVE-2006-1206Mar 14, 2006risk 0.04cvss —epss 0.12
Matt Johnston Dropbear SSH server 0.47 and earlier, as used in embedded Linux devices and on general-purpose operating systems, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection slot exhaustion) via a large number of connection attempts that exceeds the…
- CVE-2013-4421Oct 25, 2013risk 0.01cvss —epss 0.06
The buf_decompress function in packet.c in Dropbear SSH Server before 2013.59 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a compressed packet that has a large size when it is decompressed.
- CVE-2012-0920Jun 5, 2012risk 0.01cvss —epss 0.06
Use-after-free vulnerability in Dropbear SSH Server 0.52 through 2012.54, when command restriction and public key authentication are enabled, allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code and bypass command restrictions via multiple crafted command requests,…
- risk 0.00cvss 7.5epss 0.01
An issue was discovered in Dropbear through 2020.81. Due to a non-RFC-compliant check of the available authentication methods in the client-side SSH code, it is possible for an SSH server to change the login process in its favor. This attack can bypass additional security…
- CVE-2013-4434Oct 25, 2013risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.06
Dropbear SSH Server before 2013.59 generates error messages for a failed logon attempt with different time delays depending on whether the user account exists, which allows remote attackers to discover valid usernames.
- CVE-2007-1099Feb 26, 2007risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.02
dbclient in Dropbear SSH client before 0.49 does not sufficiently warn the user when it detects a hostkey mismatch, which might allow remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks.
- CVE-2005-4178Dec 12, 2005risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.03
Buffer overflow in Dropbear server before 0.47 allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified inputs that cause insufficient memory to be allocated due to an incorrect expression that does not enforce the proper order of operations.
- CVE-2004-2486Dec 31, 2004risk 0.00cvss —epss 0.03
The DSS verification code in Dropbear SSH Server before 0.43 frees uninitialized variables, which might allow remote attackers to gain access.