Portage
Sign in to watchby Gentoo
CVEs (5)
| CVE | Sev | Risk | CVSS | EPSS | KEV | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2004-2778 | Hig | 0.46 | 7.1 | 0.00 | Jun 27, 2017 | Ebuild in Gentoo may change directory and file permissions depending on the order of installed packages, which allows local users to read or write to restricted directories or execute restricted commands via navigating to the affected directories, or executing the affected commands. | |
| CVE-2004-1901 | Med | 0.36 | 5.5 | 0.00 | Dec 31, 2004 | Portage before 2.0.50-r3 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a hard link attack on the lockfiles. | |
| CVE-2013-2100 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | Sep 29, 2014 | The urlopen function in pym/portage/util/_urlopen.py in Gentoo Portage 2.1.12, when using HTTPS, does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and modify binary package lists via a crafted certificate. | ||
| CVE-2008-4394 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | Oct 10, 2008 | Multiple untrusted search path vulnerabilities in Portage before 2.1.4.5 include the current working directory in the Python search path, which allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a modified Python module that is loaded by the (1) ys-apps/portage, (2) net-mail/fetchmail, (3) app-editors/leo ebuilds, and other ebuilds. | ||
| CVE-2007-6249 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 | Dec 15, 2007 | etc-update in Portage before 2.1.3.11 on Gentoo Linux relies on the umask to set permissions for the merge file, often resulting in permissions weaker than those of the original files, which might allow local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the merge file. |