rpm package
suse/bind&distro=SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5
pkg:rpm/suse/bind&distro=SUSE%20Linux%20Enterprise%20Server%2012%20SP5
Vulnerabilities (20)
| CVE | Sev | CVSS | KEV | Affected versions | Fixed in | Published | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-1975 | Hig | 7.5 | < 9.11.22-3.57.1 | 9.11.22-3.57.1 | Jul 23, 2024 | If a server hosts a zone containing a "KEY" Resource Record, or a resolver DNSSEC-validates a "KEY" Resource Record from a DNSSEC-signed domain in cache, a client can exhaust resolver CPU resources by sending a stream of SIG(0) signed requests. This issue affects BIND 9 versions | |
| CVE-2024-1737 | Hig | 7.5 | < 9.11.22-3.57.1 | 9.11.22-3.57.1 | Jul 23, 2024 | Resolver caches and authoritative zone databases that hold significant numbers of RRs for the same hostname (of any RTYPE) can suffer from degraded performance as content is being added or updated, and also when handling client queries for this name. This issue affects BIND 9 ver | |
| CVE-2023-50868 | — | < 9.11.22-3.52.1 | 9.11.22-3.52.1 | Feb 14, 2024 | The Closest Encloser Proof aspect of the DNS protocol (in RFC 5155 when RFC 9276 guidance is skipped) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption for SHA-1 computations) via DNSSEC responses in a random subdomain attack, aka the "NSEC3" issue. The RFC 51 | ||
| CVE-2023-50387 | — | < 9.11.22-3.52.1 | 9.11.22-3.52.1 | Feb 14, 2024 | Certain DNSSEC aspects of the DNS protocol (in RFC 4033, 4034, 4035, 6840, and related RFCs) allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via one or more DNSSEC responses, aka the "KeyTrap" issue. One of the concerns is that, when there is a zone with man | ||
| CVE-2023-4408 | — | < 9.11.22-3.52.1 | 9.11.22-3.52.1 | Feb 13, 2024 | The DNS message parsing code in `named` includes a section whose computational complexity is overly high. It does not cause problems for typical DNS traffic, but crafted queries and responses may cause excessive CPU load on the affected `named` instance by exploiting this flaw. T | ||
| CVE-2023-3341 | — | < 9.11.22-3.49.1 | 9.11.22-3.49.1 | Sep 20, 2023 | The code that processes control channel messages sent to `named` calls certain functions recursively during packet parsing. Recursion depth is only limited by the maximum accepted packet size; depending on the environment, this may cause the packet-parsing code to run out of avai | ||
| CVE-2023-2828 | — | < 9.11.22-3.46.4 | 9.11.22-3.46.4 | Jun 21, 2023 | Every `named` instance configured to run as a recursive resolver maintains a cache database holding the responses to the queries it has recently sent to authoritative servers. The size limit for that cache database can be configured using the `max-cache-size` statement in the con | ||
| CVE-2022-38178 | — | < 9.11.22-3.43.1 | 9.11.22-3.43.1 | Sep 21, 2022 | By spoofing the target resolver with responses that have a malformed EdDSA signature, an attacker can trigger a small memory leak. It is possible to gradually erode available memory to the point where named crashes for lack of resources. | ||
| CVE-2022-38177 | — | < 9.11.22-3.43.1 | 9.11.22-3.43.1 | Sep 21, 2022 | By spoofing the target resolver with responses that have a malformed ECDSA signature, an attacker can trigger a small memory leak. It is possible to gradually erode available memory to the point where named crashes for lack of resources. | ||
| CVE-2022-2795 | — | < 9.11.22-3.43.1 | 9.11.22-3.43.1 | Sep 21, 2022 | By flooding the target resolver with queries exploiting this flaw an attacker can significantly impair the resolver's performance, effectively denying legitimate clients access to the DNS resolution service. | ||
| CVE-2021-25220 | — | < 9.11.22-3.40.1 | 9.11.22-3.40.1 | Mar 23, 2022 | BIND 9.11.0 -> 9.11.36 9.12.0 -> 9.16.26 9.17.0 -> 9.18.0 BIND Supported Preview Editions: 9.11.4-S1 -> 9.11.36-S1 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.26-S1 Versions of BIND 9 earlier than those shown - back to 9.1.0, including Supported Preview Editions - are also believed to be affected but have | ||
| CVE-2021-25219 | — | < 9.11.22-3.37.1 | 9.11.22-3.37.1 | Oct 27, 2021 | In BIND 9.3.0 -> 9.11.35, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.21, and versions 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.35-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.21-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.18 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, exploitation of broken authoritative servers using a | ||
| CVE-2021-25215 | — | < 9.11.22-3.34.1 | 9.11.22-3.34.1 | Apr 29, 2021 | In BIND 9.0.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.11 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, when a vulnerable version of named receives a qu | ||
| CVE-2021-25214 | — | < 9.11.22-3.34.1 | 9.11.22-3.34.1 | Apr 29, 2021 | In BIND 9.8.5 -> 9.8.8, 9.9.3 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.11 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, when a vulnerable version of n | ||
| CVE-2020-8625 | — | < 9.11.22-3.29.1 | 9.11.22-3.29.1 | Feb 17, 2021 | BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting valid valu | ||
| CVE-2020-8624 | — | < 9.11.22-3.22.1 | 9.11.22-3.22.1 | Aug 21, 2020 | In BIND 9.9.12 -> 9.9.13, 9.10.7 -> 9.10.8, 9.11.3 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.1 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.9.12-S1 -> 9.9.13-S1, 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker who has been granted privileges to change a specific subset of the | ||
| CVE-2020-8623 | — | < 9.11.22-3.22.1 | 9.11.22-3.22.1 | Aug 21, 2020 | In BIND 9.10.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.10.5-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker that can reach a vulnerable system with a specially crafted query packet can trigger a crash. To be vulnerable, the system must | ||
| CVE-2020-8622 | — | < 9.11.22-3.22.1 | 9.11.22-3.22.1 | Aug 21, 2020 | In BIND 9.0.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker on the network path for a TSIG-signed request, or operating the server receiving the TSIG-signed request, could send a truncated | ||
| CVE-2020-8617 | — | < 9.11.2-3.17.1 | 9.11.2-3.17.1 | May 19, 2020 | Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses) the name of a TSIG key used by the server. Since BIND, by default, configures a local session key even on servers whos | ||
| CVE-2020-8616 | — | < 9.11.2-3.17.1 | 9.11.2-3.17.1 | May 19, 2020 | A malicious actor who intentionally exploits this lack of effective limitation on the number of fetches performed when processing referrals can, through the use of specially crafted referrals, cause a recursing server to issue a very large number of fetches in an attempt to proce |
- affected < 9.11.22-3.57.1fixed 9.11.22-3.57.1
If a server hosts a zone containing a "KEY" Resource Record, or a resolver DNSSEC-validates a "KEY" Resource Record from a DNSSEC-signed domain in cache, a client can exhaust resolver CPU resources by sending a stream of SIG(0) signed requests. This issue affects BIND 9 versions
- affected < 9.11.22-3.57.1fixed 9.11.22-3.57.1
Resolver caches and authoritative zone databases that hold significant numbers of RRs for the same hostname (of any RTYPE) can suffer from degraded performance as content is being added or updated, and also when handling client queries for this name. This issue affects BIND 9 ver
- CVE-2023-50868Feb 14, 2024affected < 9.11.22-3.52.1fixed 9.11.22-3.52.1
The Closest Encloser Proof aspect of the DNS protocol (in RFC 5155 when RFC 9276 guidance is skipped) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption for SHA-1 computations) via DNSSEC responses in a random subdomain attack, aka the "NSEC3" issue. The RFC 51
- CVE-2023-50387Feb 14, 2024affected < 9.11.22-3.52.1fixed 9.11.22-3.52.1
Certain DNSSEC aspects of the DNS protocol (in RFC 4033, 4034, 4035, 6840, and related RFCs) allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via one or more DNSSEC responses, aka the "KeyTrap" issue. One of the concerns is that, when there is a zone with man
- CVE-2023-4408Feb 13, 2024affected < 9.11.22-3.52.1fixed 9.11.22-3.52.1
The DNS message parsing code in `named` includes a section whose computational complexity is overly high. It does not cause problems for typical DNS traffic, but crafted queries and responses may cause excessive CPU load on the affected `named` instance by exploiting this flaw. T
- CVE-2023-3341Sep 20, 2023affected < 9.11.22-3.49.1fixed 9.11.22-3.49.1
The code that processes control channel messages sent to `named` calls certain functions recursively during packet parsing. Recursion depth is only limited by the maximum accepted packet size; depending on the environment, this may cause the packet-parsing code to run out of avai
- CVE-2023-2828Jun 21, 2023affected < 9.11.22-3.46.4fixed 9.11.22-3.46.4
Every `named` instance configured to run as a recursive resolver maintains a cache database holding the responses to the queries it has recently sent to authoritative servers. The size limit for that cache database can be configured using the `max-cache-size` statement in the con
- CVE-2022-38178Sep 21, 2022affected < 9.11.22-3.43.1fixed 9.11.22-3.43.1
By spoofing the target resolver with responses that have a malformed EdDSA signature, an attacker can trigger a small memory leak. It is possible to gradually erode available memory to the point where named crashes for lack of resources.
- CVE-2022-38177Sep 21, 2022affected < 9.11.22-3.43.1fixed 9.11.22-3.43.1
By spoofing the target resolver with responses that have a malformed ECDSA signature, an attacker can trigger a small memory leak. It is possible to gradually erode available memory to the point where named crashes for lack of resources.
- CVE-2022-2795Sep 21, 2022affected < 9.11.22-3.43.1fixed 9.11.22-3.43.1
By flooding the target resolver with queries exploiting this flaw an attacker can significantly impair the resolver's performance, effectively denying legitimate clients access to the DNS resolution service.
- CVE-2021-25220Mar 23, 2022affected < 9.11.22-3.40.1fixed 9.11.22-3.40.1
BIND 9.11.0 -> 9.11.36 9.12.0 -> 9.16.26 9.17.0 -> 9.18.0 BIND Supported Preview Editions: 9.11.4-S1 -> 9.11.36-S1 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.26-S1 Versions of BIND 9 earlier than those shown - back to 9.1.0, including Supported Preview Editions - are also believed to be affected but have
- CVE-2021-25219Oct 27, 2021affected < 9.11.22-3.37.1fixed 9.11.22-3.37.1
In BIND 9.3.0 -> 9.11.35, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.21, and versions 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.35-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.21-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.18 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, exploitation of broken authoritative servers using a
- CVE-2021-25215Apr 29, 2021affected < 9.11.22-3.34.1fixed 9.11.22-3.34.1
In BIND 9.0.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.11 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, when a vulnerable version of named receives a qu
- CVE-2021-25214Apr 29, 2021affected < 9.11.22-3.34.1fixed 9.11.22-3.34.1
In BIND 9.8.5 -> 9.8.8, 9.9.3 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.11 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, when a vulnerable version of n
- CVE-2020-8625Feb 17, 2021affected < 9.11.22-3.29.1fixed 9.11.22-3.29.1
BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting valid valu
- CVE-2020-8624Aug 21, 2020affected < 9.11.22-3.22.1fixed 9.11.22-3.22.1
In BIND 9.9.12 -> 9.9.13, 9.10.7 -> 9.10.8, 9.11.3 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.1 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.9.12-S1 -> 9.9.13-S1, 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker who has been granted privileges to change a specific subset of the
- CVE-2020-8623Aug 21, 2020affected < 9.11.22-3.22.1fixed 9.11.22-3.22.1
In BIND 9.10.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.10.5-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker that can reach a vulnerable system with a specially crafted query packet can trigger a crash. To be vulnerable, the system must
- CVE-2020-8622Aug 21, 2020affected < 9.11.22-3.22.1fixed 9.11.22-3.22.1
In BIND 9.0.0 -> 9.11.21, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.5, 9.17.0 -> 9.17.3, also affects 9.9.3-S1 -> 9.11.21-S1 of the BIND 9 Supported Preview Edition, An attacker on the network path for a TSIG-signed request, or operating the server receiving the TSIG-signed request, could send a truncated
- CVE-2020-8617May 19, 2020affected < 9.11.2-3.17.1fixed 9.11.2-3.17.1
Using a specially-crafted message, an attacker may potentially cause a BIND server to reach an inconsistent state if the attacker knows (or successfully guesses) the name of a TSIG key used by the server. Since BIND, by default, configures a local session key even on servers whos
- CVE-2020-8616May 19, 2020affected < 9.11.2-3.17.1fixed 9.11.2-3.17.1
A malicious actor who intentionally exploits this lack of effective limitation on the number of fetches performed when processing referrals can, through the use of specially crafted referrals, cause a recursing server to issue a very large number of fetches in an attempt to proce